10 Apr 07
Originally posted by RBHILLSo where'd all those distinct layers come from then?
EcstremeVenom is right the answer is False.
Even though Louis Pasteur (1860's) scientifically proved that life could not spontaneously generate from non-living matter, today"s evolutionists are willing to believe it did.
The idea of basic cells emerging in primordial seas has nothing to do with the idea of mice popping into existence in piles of trash...
10 Apr 07
Originally posted by RBHILLPasteur proved no such thing. What he showed was that it was highly unlikely that modern living organisms arose from non-living organic material. This is a much more restricted claim than that primitive life once arose from non-living non-organic material. Not only that, but his experiment had a massively limiting physical environment.
Answer:
A. a hypothesis of spontaneous generation.
[Dr. G. Wald, "The Origin of Life," Scientific American, August 1954] Even though Louis Pasteur (1860's) scientifically proved that life could not spontaneously generate from non-living matter, today"s evolutionists are willing to believe it did.
10 Apr 07
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
10 Apr 07
1 edit
Originally posted by RBHILLAn idiot. Firstly science has nothing to do with competition for ideas, that's politics or religion. Secondly, ID has no basis in scientific method.
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
Why did you not answer my question earlier?
10 Apr 07
Originally posted by RBHILLAnswer: A. Cal Thomas (columnist)
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
10 Apr 07
Originally posted by RBHILLA total idiot. ID has NO BASIS in science.
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
ID is nothing more than belief in magic.
10 Apr 07
Originally posted by RBHILLAnswer: B. Black Holes.
20. What does the "no-hair theorem" have to do with?
A. Deforestation.
B. Black holes.
C. Male pattern baldness.
In astrophysics, the no-hair theorm states that black holes have no features that distinguish one black hole from another, other than mass, charge, and angular momentum.