Originally posted by KellyJayYou will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
Whatever, it does not matter that I answer your questions or not, it doesn't
matter that you get anything presented to you, you are right, and cannot be
wrong. So answering your questions, or calling what is going on here a
discussion is pointless. You want to bad mouth me about that, run me down
your good at that.
Kelly
I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou can't possible be old enough to know about World War I. I was not
You will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
during the end of 1964 onward.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou mean I can't possibly old enough to have witnessed it personally.
You can't possible be old enough to know about World War I.
I was not born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
during the end of 1964 onward.
You believe that it is possible that World War I and the Vietnam war may never have taken place and may in fact be a grand conspiracy to deceive you? And yet you accept word for word various books from thousands of years ago in the Middle east.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou are breaking one of Dasa dishonesty rules again. I never said such
You mean I can't possibly old enough to have witnessed it personally.
[b]I was not born until right at the end of World War II and I my sure I am older than
you. I would not even think of claiming I could not be wrong about the
Vietnam War in which I have lived through and served in the U.S. Army
during the end of 1964 onward.
You believe that ...[text shortened]... And yet you accept word for word various books from thousands of years ago in the Middle east.[/b]
a thing. I said you can be wrong about some knowledge you think you
have about World War I after you claimed you could not be wrong about
World War I.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI believe you said you cannot be wrong about the dating methods, if I implied
You will not answer because you know it will highlight your error. Simple as that.
I never said I cannot be wrong. I said I cannot be wrong about certain things such as 2+2=4 and World War I. If you believe you could be wrong about everything then it is you that makes discussion pointless as you essentially admit to knowing nothing, and whats worse, believe you are capable of knowing nothing. You can never be right except by chance.
anything else, sorry my bad. I'm not quite sure why you think 2+2=4 is on the
same level as was this here X years ago since all you need for 2+2=4 is on
the screen not so with dating methods, not sure what you think you cannot be
wrong about as far as WW1 either! Since that is wrapped up in human records
and memory why you think that is on the same level as dating methods. I've
not said we cannot know anything, that is you twisting my words.
Kelly