Random logic?

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
It speaks volumes about my contempt for those who won't write their own posts yet expect others to respond to their copied posts.

It also speaks volumes of your inability to respond to a couple of paragraphs (which have been sited) which are refuting what you have posted.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Strange that many evolutionists tend to disagree with you:

"Contrary to what scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. BY doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports the theory,"

[b] Ronald R. West, Ph.D (paleocology and goelogy)

There are always going to be unfortunate incidences where a scienist's words are twisted by people of no honor.
Actually in this case it's his own fault for butchering the language.
To read that statement the way you do is to read : " Gathering data that fits a Theoretical prediction and then saying it supports the Theory involved is a circular argument.."

Originally posted by dj2becker
Strange that many evolutionists tend to disagree with you:

"Contrary to what scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. BY doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports the theory,"

[b] Ronald R. West, Ph.D (paleocology and goelogy)

Here a few that do :

Academy of Science of the Royal Society of Canada
Alabama Academy of Science
American Anthropological Association
American Anthropological Association (2000)*
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1923)
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1972)
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1982)
American Association for the Advancement of Science (Commission on Science Education)
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2002) *
American Association of Physical Anthropologists
American Astronomical Society (2000) *
American Geophysical Union
American Geophysical Union (1999)*
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Astronomical Society
American Society of Biological Chemists
American Chemical Society
American Geological Institute
American Psychological Association
American Physical Society
American Society of Parasitologists
Association of Southeastern Biologists (2004) *
Association for Women Geoscientists (1998) *
Australian Academy of Science *
Botanical Society of America *
California Academy of Sciences
Ecological Society of America (1999) *
Genetics Society of America *
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of America (2001) *
Geological Society of Australia (1995) *
Georgia Academy of Science (1980)
Georgia Academy of Science (1982)
Georgia Academy of Science (2003) *
History of Science Society *
Iowa Academy of Science (1982)
Statement of the Position of the Iowa Academy of Science on Pseudoscience (1986)
Iowa Academy of Science (2000) *
Kentucky Academy of Science
Kentucky Academy of Science (1999) *
Kentucky Paleontological Society Statement on the Teaching of Evolution (1999) *
Louisiana Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences (1972)
National Academy of Sciences (1984)
National Academy of Sciences (1998) *
North American Benthological Society (2001) *
North Carolina Academy of Science
North Carolina Academy of Science (1997) *
New Orleans Geological Society
New York Academy of Sciences
Ohio Academy of Science
Ohio Academy of Science (2000) *
Ohio Math and Science Coalition (2002) *
Oklahoma Academy of Sciences
The Paleontological Society *
Sigma Xi, Louisiana State University Chapter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Society for Amateur Scientists
Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (2001) *
Society for Neuroscience *
Society for Organic Petrology *
Society for the Study of Evolution
Society of Physics Students (1999) *
Society of Physics Students (2003) *
Society of Systematic Biologists (2001) *
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (1986)
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (1994)
Southern Anthropological Society
Virginia Academy of Science (1981) *
West Virginia Academy of Science

* statement added since second edition (1995)

Originally posted by dj2becker
Your bias is clearly showing. Your failure to respond speaks volumes.

Let me get this straight.

You post half your stuff from christian-answers.net, and yet you accuse others of bias??

Originally posted by dj2becker
It also speaks volumes of your inability to respond to a couple of paragraphs (which have been sited) which are refuting what you have posted.

I've responded to "a couple paragraphs". Then you supplied a couple more. I responded to those. Then you supplied a couple more. The chain kept going until I got annoyed with you and refused to continue.

By the way, you only started citing after I pointed out how every post of yours was plagiarized. You copied others' material and implied by your lack of citations that the material was your own.

Originally posted by dj2becker
IS EVOLUTION SCIENTIFIC?

"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to 'bend' their observations to fit in with it."
[b] H.S. Lipson, FRS (Professor of Physics, Universtiy of Manchester, UK)

IS IT A FACT OR A FAITH

"The fact of evolution is the backbone of bi ...[text shortened]... igin of Species. [/b]

If you don't have "faith" in evolution, then why do you defend it?
[/b]

If you don't have "faith" in evolution, then why do you defend it?

My statement about faith was not about evolution but about the origin of matter and the forces of the universe. You're implying I said something I did not which is deceptive and insulting. Please don't do that.

Originally posted by dj2becker
A single undisputed link that clearly connects two of the hundreds of major family groups.

No problem.

But I don't intend to paste chunks of material here. Here are hundreds.

Look at them yourself at: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

Originally posted by dj2becker
IS EVOLUTION SCIENTIFIC?

"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to 'bend' their observations to fit in with it."
[b] H.S. Lipson, FRS (Professor of Physics, Universtiy of Manchester, UK)

IS IT A FACT OR A FAITH

"The fact of evolution is the backbone of bi ...[text shortened]... igin of Species. [/b]

If you don't have "faith" in evolution, then why do you defend it?
[/b]

Are you taking these quotes from "The Other Quote Book?" published by either the Creation Science Foundation (CSF) or Answers-in-Genesis (AiG)? If so, you need to know that most of them are taken out of context and the scientists quoted resile from the CSF claims.