13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmfI make nothing of what other people say.
What do you make of Roy Moore's surrogates defending him by telling people to look at the example of Jesus' family?
In Alabama the age of consent is 16 so there was nothing illegal about going out with 16,17 or 18 year olds when he was 30 if that is true.
Evidently the woman who accuses him of abuse at 14 makes that same claim of many men. At least that was the story on the radio last week.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @eladarAs a Christian what do you think of the Roy Moore-Joseph comparison, and the high school age girls (Moore admits to having a taste for) v Mary comparison?
I make nothing of what other people say.
In Alabama the age of consent is 16 so there was nothing illegal about going out with 16,17 or 18 year olds when he was 30 if that is true.
Evidently the woman who accuses him of abuse at 14 makes that same claim of many men. At least that was the story on the radio last week.
Originally posted by @fmfWithout evidence it is meaningless.
No. It's about serious accusations and denials by the accused. What else don't you realize? It's a big news story.
Given the timing, this is obviously politically motivated and possibly it is possibly just simply false witness.
As I stated eaelier, people are innocent until found guilty in a court of law.
Yes it is a big news story. The news is simply a propaganda wing of the establishment.
14 Nov 17
Originally posted by @wolfgang59It was 16 in the 70s. How recent is recent?
That is a fairly recent change to the law.
By progressives I guess!
14 Nov 17
Originally posted by @eladarI asked you: What evidence would you require?
So you think he said she said is good enough to convict a person? No evidence is required?
No, I said nothing about it being "enough to convict". But, with reference to the accusations, you ask "No evidence is required?" Are you saying that testimony itself is not evidence?