24 Oct 11
Originally posted by josephwI suggested that your comment at the top of the previous page about not wanting to get Dasa banned was clearly inaccurate in the light of your original OP and subsequent posts. It's your prerogative to disagree with me. Others can just go and read what you posted for themselves.
You said things that weren't true.
24 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFI like Dasa.
I suggested that your comment at the top of the previous page about not wanting to get Dasa banned was clearly inaccurate in the light of your original OP and subsequent posts. It's your prerogative to disagree with me. Others can just go and read what you posted for themselves.
26 Oct 11
4 edits
Originally posted by josephwI'm not a "zealot". You know next to nothing about me except what I tell you I believe. Obviously to someone such as yourself, who believes in nothing, someone like me, who believes in something, is a zealot. That's bigotry in case you haven't noticed.[/b]
[b]"I'd normally ignore an outburst like this, but since you quote my post I'm going to assume you're aiming this primarily at me, and as such I shall respond directly."
No outburst. Just a reasoned reply to the vitriol of those who make personal attacks against me because they are in denial.
"I deny your charge of hypocrisy. I ignore most pos ons are reflective of your presumptuous self important attitude.
You come across as a zealot. My use of the term is certainly not bigotry - I suggest you look up both these terms in a good dictionary.
I didn't "whip up" anyone's feelings about banning Dasa. Obviously feelings play a large role in the minds of those who accuse me of doing so. Not that I don't have feelings, but I try to approach this debate as objectively as I can. But since I'm only human like the rest of you I make mistakes, but that is no justification for reprisal.
Your original post was clearly an attempt at raising opinion against Dasa. That you regret it may be indicated by the edit you made, although this is not so clear.
I'll concede to a degree of antipathy. I hear it from everyone else too. You hate Christianity. Don't deny it.
I will certainly deny it. It would be the height of folly to 'hate' a religion, in my opinion. I'm not keen on some christians, particularly the closed-minded evangelising kind or those who view non-christians in such negative light as you appear to do, but I have great of respect for many christians.
Ya, so what's your point? Are all debate opponents always allowed into a debate everywhere?
Yes, of course, provided they observe the rules laid down by the forum.
Don't be so obtuse. Those two questions are reflective of your presumptuous self important attitude.
I'm not being obtuse. You were the one who claimed a conspiracy. I would be interested to hear how you can interpret these questions as reflective of a 'presumptuous, self-important attitude'. What presumptions do you think I am making? Why do you feel my attitude is self-important? I can assure you I don't feel self important!
