11 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI fully remember that Behe is a creationist, but you should remember that this is the man who under oath admitted that the definition of 'theory' as he applied it to intelligent design was so loose that astrology would qualify as a theory by definition as well.
Zappy has got this thing with intelligence, i dunno, he has an inferiority complex or something and he needs to prove how smart he is, therefore, the prof is a creationist and Zappy should remember that, as should you and Fibby. in fact there are many intelligent persons who as yet have not restricted their search for truth to unintelligent causes, ...[text shortened]... borgs cannot handle that, you all want us to be assimilated into the evolutionary subconscious!
Now that's what i call unscientific!!
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by FabianFnasyeah yeah, same old evolutionist dogma, those creationists dont know what they are talking about, why dont you call our professor Behe and you also can exchange notes and compare your c.v,. then you might like to tell him what he does and doesn't know!
But not about evolution. And this is for a fact!
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by Proper Knobyes and your point is? one may also apply the same criteria to evolution based on its lack of evidence me thinks.
I fully remember that Behe is a creationist, but you should remember that this is the man who under oath admitted that the definition of 'theory' as he applied it to intelligent design was so loose that astrology would qualify as a theory by definition as well.
Now that's what i call unscientific!!
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd dr Behe is your prophet with his dogma and you believe him without any thoughts of your own? So very creationistic of you...
yeah yeah, same old evolutionist dogma, those creationists dont know what they are talking about, why dont you call our professor Behe and you also can exchange notes and compare your c.v,. then you might like to tell him what he does and doesn't know!
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by FabianFnasits professor Behe to you, that's right i cannot think for myself, i have been assimilated in the evolutionist collective subconscious, resistance is futile! resistance is futile!
And dr Behe is your prophet with his dogma and you believe him without any thoughts of your own? So very creationistic of you...
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobiejust because someone says one insanely stupid thing doesn't make him dumber or more stupid than me. just because someone is smarter than me doesn't make him incapable of uttering insanely stupid ideas.
one theory is as good as another! perhaps you would like to call out Professor M.J.Behe, have a look at his c.v. then you could compare notes and discuss who is smarter?
yes, he may have more knowledge than me, he may have a larger iq, but he is still wrong about intelligent design.
and no, one theory is not as good as another. there are really dumb theories.
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe point is this Robbie, there is mountanious evidence for evolution, and only a small book of evidence for your religious beliefs. You though insist on keeping your head submerged in the 'collective subconcious' of the quaint traditionalists and the superstitious, the rest of us are evolved beings who listen to and accept the wisdom of genius scientists who have progressed our species. You are quite happy to accept those advancements, unless it contradicts your out-dated religious beliefs of course. How could the book be wrong?
yes and your point is? one may also apply the same criteria to evolution based on its lack of evidence me thinks.
11 Nov 09
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNow you are talking non sence. I call him mr Behe, because scientific titles can only be given to people working with science.
its professor Behe to you, that's right i cannot think for myself, i have been assimilated in the evolutionist collective subconscious, resistance is futile! resistance is futile!
11 Nov 09
i just thought of something. does it makes us bad persons for constantly yelling at poor robbie? making fun of retarded or insane people is very evil and i do believe what we are doing is evil.
no hope of educating robbie. no point in trying. no reward for us. so why do we still try? is it because we are evil?
11 Nov 09
1 edit
Originally posted by ZahlanziHe can believe in intelligent design and creationism as much as he wants, it's his religion. We are in spiritual forum, aren't we?
i just thought of something. does it makes us bad persons for constantly yelling at poor robbie? making fun of retarded or insane people is very evil and i do believe what we are doing is evil.
no hope of educating robbie. no point in trying. no reward for us. so why do we still try? is it because we are evil?
But when he talks about ID as it is science, then I have to object!
When he talks about evolution as it is bogus, then I have to object!
If he knew anything, anything at all, about evolution, then he can have his opinions, but as he hasn't, then I can try to educate him as much as I want. It's for his good, isn't it?
He doesn't complain of our behaviour. He shows us that he approves of it, because he behaves the same himself. No, I don't think it's evil to teach him the basics about evolution.