Originally posted by Proper Knobconfession that nominal Christianity is empty and devoid, what else? call me what you like, its your perception.
Confession for what exactly, what does anyone who posts on this board have to do with the lynchings in your OP? Answer........nothing.
This is you trolling and baiting. Any attempt by you to claim otherwise is a lie.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEven putting your OP on one side, you had initiated the personal remarks before divegeester had even arrived on this thread.
again on the contrary divesgeester was the one who initiated personal remarks stating that i and my friends would let children die. Are you saying that this was not the case? If not then you will tell us who initiated personal remarks?
Originally posted by FMFIf anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible.
Untrue. I have said absolutely nothing the sort.
these are your words are they not - clearly many innocents have died because of taking blood transfusion that makes in your opinion blood transfusions morally reprehensible. I did not author it, these are your words.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMy words were: If anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible. Crystal clear. Absolutely no need for you to re-frame them to mean anything other than what they clearly mean.
these are your words are they not - clearly many innocents have died because of taking blood transfusion that makes in your opinion blood transfusions morally reprehensible. I did not author it, these are your words.
Originally posted by FMFI dont need to reframe them, they are what they are, you think that in certain circumstances blood transfusions are morally reprehensible.
My words were: If anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible. Crystal clear. Absolutely no need for you to re-frame them to mean anything other than what they clearly mean.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo I said deliberately ending the life of an innocent is morally reprehensible. So a pilot deliberately crashing his plane into a mountain is morally reprehensible, but the fact that there are plane crashes does not make flying in planes morally reprehensible.
I dont need to reframe them, they are what they are, you think that in certain circumstances blood transfusions are morally reprehensible.
Originally posted by Proper Knobthey are sentient beings and can proffer some knowledge as to why its possible to listen to a sermon on a Sunday afternoon and go out afterwards on a Sunday picnic to watch a man being lynched. They could offer a perspective that i was unaware of, by way of example.
Again, what does anyone on this forum have to do with the lynchings in your OP?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOn page 2 you said to divegeester: "Lets start, that would be 4000 persons your churches have lynched, mutilated, burnt and invited your friends and children to watch die."
they are sentient beings and can proffer some knowledge as to why its possible to listen to a sermon on a Sunday afternoon and go out afterwards on a Sunday picnic to watch a man being lynched. They could offer a perspective that i was unaware of, by way of example.
What did you mean by saying that divegeester's "friends and children" were invited to watch people being lynched?