Originally posted by dj2beckerEven that is not an absoltute truth. You failed to indicate whether the arm was living or dead. A dead arm will not bleed so where is your absolute in that area?
If you don't believe in absolute truth then you should ask someone to cut open your arm, and you will find the proof of the absolute truth that a cut to the arm draweth blood.
Also what you describe as absolute truth can only be absolute belief.
Originally posted by AgergSo in other words you are saying that you need absolute knowledge to validate anything, since by validating something you are ruling out it's non-existence?
you deny the non-existance of God!!!...whether it is a double negative or not you now have to search every corner of the bloody universe to prove he does not *not exist*...happy hunting
That is as absurd as you can get.
Originally posted by sonhouseEven that is not an absoltute truth. You failed to indicate whether the arm was living or dead.
Even that is not an absoltute truth. You failed to indicate whether the arm was living or dead. A dead arm will not bleed so where is your absolute in that area?
Also what you describe as absolute truth can only be absolute belief.
Do you mean to say that Agerg would carry a dead arm with him or do you mean to say that Agerg is dead?
Originally posted by dj2beckerI never said you need absolute knowledge to validate *anything*... I'm refuting your standpoint by arguing that you need absolute knowledge to deny the non existance of God!!! (because your entire argument is totally ridiculous, and so I choose to warp it such that it serves my own ends)
So in other words you are saying that you need absolute knowledge to validate anything, since by validating something you are ruling out it's non-existence?
That is as absurd as you can get.
Prove to me that you are not *mistaken and that only the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the true being that is transcendant over all others.
Originally posted by AgergSo how would you prove that there is no gold in China without having absolute knowledge of China?
I never said you need absolute knowledge to validate *anything*... I'm refuting your standpoint by arguing that you need absolute knowledge to deny the non existance of God!!! (because your entire argument is totally ridiculous, and so I choose to warp such that it serves my own ends)
Prove to me that you are not *mistaken and that only the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the true being that is transcendant over all others.