Originally posted by StarrmanDisagreed, I think all beliefs are raised upon a pre-existing conceptual framework, either directly or by stages of reason and belief.
Originally posted by vistesd
[b]No, I think there are experiences that precede reason,
agreed, but
and to which it is not necessary to apply reason or come to some belief.
Disagreed, I think all beliefs are raised upon a pre-existing conceptual framework, either directly or by stages of reason and belief.
I use the word ...[text shortened]... ons/beliefs one wants to lay on that experience are (or ought to be) subject to reason.[/b]
Can you say what you mean by “pre-existing conceptual framework”? Do you mean something like the synthetic a priori? (That would be very un-Quinian of you! 😉 ) Or do you mean the architecture of our consciousness? Or...?
Just listening doesn't, but having any thoughts upon their nature does.
Agreed.
Finding pleasure in them requires some pre-existing concepts, experiences, beliefs; what is pleasure, what Beethoven's music sounds like etc.
Not. (Depending on, again, what you mean by pre-existing conceptual framework. )
Does it make more sense as regards my post above?
Yes; but you still seem to be conflating the aesthetic experience with subsequent judgments about it. Or, that without some a priori judgments, one cannot have the experience? Enjoy it, just as it is?
Note: Some, such as Krishnamurti, also find the word “experience” problematic—I think because they do tie it in with interpreting mind. But I don’t yet know what other word to use.
Originally posted by vistesdToo drunk to work out a clear reply, tempting as it is, I'll try and get back to you tomorrow. Be well.
[b]Disagreed, I think all beliefs are raised upon a pre-existing conceptual framework, either directly or by stages of reason and belief.
Can you say what you mean by “pre-existing conceptual framework”? Do you mean something like the synthetic a priori? (That would be very un-Quinian of you! 😉 ) Or do you mean the architecture of our consciousn ...[text shortened]... ecause they do tie it in with interpreting mind. But I don’t yet know what other word to use.[/b]
Originally posted by StarrmanHeal well. 🙂
Too drunk to work out a clear reply, tempting as it is, I'll try and get back to you tomorrow. Be well.
I’m wondering though: I tend to distinguish between percept (or perceptual impression) and concept. Whenever I speak of thinking-mind or making-mind, I mean strictly the latter. One can, I think, have an emotional response to either. (There’s a question in there somewhere, but I’m too tired to flesh it out.)