Originally posted by dj2beckerI am afraid that your question is time bound. 'Brought' is a time dependent concept.
So what brought the universe into existence? (My question is not time bound)
The best answer I can give based on my best guess at what you could possibly mean would be:
The universe exists. We don't know why or if there is a why. I don't even think that 'why' is a meaningful concept in this instance either but its the best I can do.
Originally posted by dj2beckerThat's all you have .. questions without answers.
So what brought the universe into existence? (My question is not time bound)
You tell us .. what brought the universe into existence?
You try to trap everyone into stating their opinions so you can attempt to knock them down, but state no opinion of your own.
That's the intellectually dishonest part BTW.
You're trolling .. period.
You chant your mantra .. absolute truth exists.
No chit Cherlock, you mean all circles are ABSOLUTELY round?
We know that dipso .. now tell us what you've discovered beyond this abstract concept.
Originally posted by jammerYou must be new here...
That's all you have .. questions without answers.
You tell us .. what brought the universe into existence?
You try to trap everyone into stating their opinions so you can attempt to knock them down, but state no opinion of your own.
That's the intellectually dishonest part BTW.
You're trolling .. period.
You chant your mantra .. absolute truth exis ...[text shortened]... d?
We know that dipso .. now tell us what you've discovered beyond this abstract concept.
Everyone knows what I believe. 😉
Originally posted by twhiteheadBut if the universe has a beginnig, as you state, it means it must have been braught into being. Your life has a beginning, something brought you into being, believe it or not.
I am afraid that your question is time bound. 'Brought' is a time dependent concept.
The best answer I can give based on my best guess at what you could possibly mean would be:
The universe exists. We don't know why or if there is a why. I don't even think that 'why' is a meaningful concept in this instance either but its the best I can do.
Originally posted by dj2beckerGiving an example does not prove a generality. Having a beginning does not mean that something must have been brought into being. Do you have any logic or evidence to back up your claim or is it just a belief? I hope you don't just stop the discussion when you realize that you are wrong like you did in the other thread.
But if the universe has a beginnig, as you state, it means it must have been braught into being. Your life has a beginning, something brought you into being, believe it or not.
Originally posted by twhiteheadWould you care to give me ONE example from reality of something that has a beginning that was NOT brought into being?
Giving an example does not prove a generality. Having a beginning does not mean that something must have been brought into being. Do you have any logic or evidence to back up your claim or is it just a belief? I hope you don't just stop the discussion when you realize that you are wrong like you did in the other thread.
I can give you millions of examples from reality that have a beginning that were brought into being.
Originally posted by dj2beckerYour countless examples may show that it is highly likely that the rule does apply within the universe. That does not prove it.
Would you care to give me ONE example from reality of something that has a beginning that was NOT brought into being?
I can give you millions of examples from reality that have a beginning that were brought into being.
It does not indicate in any way whether or not it applies to the universe itself.
Now for my example. Throughout all space/time there are particles which 'pop' into and out of existence. To my knowledge they are not 'brought into being'.
Of course we cannot proceed without further analyzing and defining what we mean by 'brought into being'.
The energy of the universe is constantly moving and changing and reconfiguring itself according to the laws of physics. So at any given time a place in the universe the particular configuration of matter has just been 'brought into being' from a previous state. This effect is what we know as time. So can the concept have meaning independent of time? I don't think so.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYour countless examples may show that it is highly likely that the rule does apply within the universe. That does not prove it.
Your countless examples may show that it is highly likely that the rule does apply within the universe. That does not prove it.
It does not indicate in any way whether or not it applies to the universe itself.
Now for my example. Throughout all space/time there are particles which 'pop' into and out of existence. To my knowledge they are not 'brough ...[text shortened]... we know as time. So can the concept have meaning independent of time? I don't think so.
My countless examples are all within reality. Do you mean to say that the universe is not a part of reality?
Throughout all space/time there are particles which 'pop' into and out of existence. To my knowledge they are not 'brought into being'.
You might want to be a little more specific. How do you know that they are not brought into existence?
Let me try and narrow this down a bit: You have two choices:
Either
The universe has existed for all eternity
Or
The universe has not existed for all eternity existed.
Which is it?
Originally posted by scottishinnzEither
You are asking a time-dependent question. That is not appropriate here. Cause and effect need time - there was none, therefore cause and effect are not appropriate.
1.The universe has existed for all eternity, has no beginning, and was not brought into being.
Or
2.The universe has not existed for all eternity, has a beginning, and was brought into being.
Which one is it?
Originally posted by dj2beckerNeither.
Either
1.The universe has existed for all eternity, has no beginning, and was not brought into being.
Or
2.The universe has not existed for all eternity, has a beginning, and was brought into being.
Which one is it?
Eternity is time dependant. Time is a property of the universe, not something external to it.
Originally posted by dj2beckerI can give you countless examples of snake with no legs. That does not mean that all animal have no legs.
My countless examples are all within reality. Do you mean to say that the universe is not a part of reality?
All your examples were within the universe. There is no indication that they apply to anything external to the universe or even to the universe itself.
As far as I know the universe is reality.
You might want to be a little more specific. How do you know that they are not brought into existence?
I do not know. All I know is that there is no evidence that they don't. Therefore we have an example of an entity that has not been shown to be 'brought into existence'.
Let me try and narrow this down a bit: You have two choices:
Either
The universe has existed for all eternity
Or
The universe has not existed for all eternity existed.
Which is it?
Please define eternity as it means different things to different people.