Spirituality
11 Jul 13
18 Aug 13
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI used to live on the South Coast and there were endless flood rumours - In brighton people believe con trails from aeroplanes are being used to manipulate the climate (as opposed to being pointed at Gatwick airport ... duh 🙄 ). Another popular one is the earths magnetic poles reversing causing a tsunami. The ice caps melting was not on the list, but are almost bound to cause .... global floods. brighton had a fishing village between what is now the 2 piers and it was ... flooded , taken by the sea.... but they miss that out too.
I think the guy in the linked video presents very good evidence that Noah's ark exists and the worldwide flood was a true historic event.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AVxRVXHYqo&NR=1&feature=endscreen
The Instructor
19 Aug 13
Originally posted by wolfgang59Yes, that is right. But in this case it should be taken literaly because the psalm is inspired by God to explain the receding of the floodwaters and why it will not happen again.
When tides go out or floodwater recedes things appear to "rise from the water" so perhaps it should not be taken literally?
But of course you have the power to discern the literal passages in the bible!
The Instructor
20 Aug 13
Originally posted by wolfgang59Do you believe that story?
Tsunami? How about loss of atmosphere and cosmic radiation?
http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/321220/scitech/science/lost-in-migration-earth-s-magnetic-field-overdue-a-flip
How do they know the poles reversed c 1 million years ago??
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by e4chrisYes.
Do you believe that story?
How do they know the poles reversed c 1 million years ago??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks
were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first
estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by
Motonori Matuyama, who observed that rocks with reversed fields were all
of early Pleistocene age or older
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by wolfgang59The first video is from the point of view of old earth scientists. The second video is from the point of view of young earth scientists.
Yes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks
were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first
estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by
Motonori Matuyama, who observed that rocks with reversed fields were all
of early Pleistocene age or older
New results on researches about Earth's Invisible Shield reversal
Strong convection in the Earth’s core during the Deluge would rapidly reverse the magnetic field while the fossil layers were being laid down. Afterwards the field would fluctuate for several thousand years and then begin decaying steadily. This young-earth model explains the paleomagnetic and archeomagnetic evidence better than old-earth “dynamic” theories do.
Nuclear physicist, Dr Russell Humphreys describes how paleomagnetic research indicates our field can not be more than 10,000 years old. Problems with the dynamo model of the earth's Magnetic Field are presented, as is the accuracy with which his model predicted magnetic strengths of other planets.
Earth's Rapid Field Reversal: Young Earth Evidence!
The Instructor
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by sonshipThe Heresies of Hugh Ross: A local Flood
[quote] God also established His rainbow covenant at that time:
[b] I establish My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth.
(Genesis 9:11 NASB)
This flood certainly could not have been a local flood because we have had many local floods si ...[text shortened]... ld's people were all gathered, would that not be in a sense, a flood of all the world ?[/b]
The Instructor
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by RJHindsOf course your so-called scientist, totally unbiased like I am sure he is, forgot to take into account the recording of the spreading of the Earth's crust between Africa and South America where the magma welling up from the depths takes on the polarity of Earth's magnetic field and then when it cools retains that magnetic field, and thus the spreading of the Earth's crust is like a giant tape recording of the polarity of Earth's magnetic field over millions of years.
The first video is from the point of view of old earth scientists. The second video is from the point of view of young earth scientists.
New results on researches about Earth's Invisible Shield reversal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJW47lV31zo
Strong convection in the Earth’s core during the Deluge would rapidly reverse the magnetic field while t ...[text shortened]... versal: Young Earth Evidence!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtTmqoXTdVI
The Instructor
I guess he forgot about that little tid bit.
But then you don't WANT real science. All you want is so-called scientists (I don't care if they have a half dozen Phd's, if they come into a study with a built in agenda, they are not doing real science, only trying to prove a point, which is decidedly NOT science) To try convincing the general population with BULLSHYTE to purposely cloud the issue in the eyes of the public. You could care less about actual science, again, only as it is usable as a weapon against evolution and the age of the Earth, WEAPONIZED SCIENCE.
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by sonhouseNo he did not forget about that, but instead of millions of years it was a few weeks or months.
Of course your so-called scientist, totally unbiased like I am sure he is, forgot to take into account the recording of the spreading of the Earth's crust between Africa and South America where the magma welling up from the depths takes on the polarity of Earth's magnetic field and then when it cools retains that magnetic field, and thus the spreading of th ...[text shortened]... it is usable as a weapon against evolution and the age of the Earth, WEAPONIZED SCIENCE.
The Instructor
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by RJHindsSo he is saying South America and Africa spread apart in bunches, where one bump say, added 500 miles in one day?
No he did not forget about that, but instead of millions of years it was a few weeks or months.
The Instructor
Tell me that is not what he means.
If so, just imagine for a moment the amount of energy expended in the Japan earthquake which peaked out at a Richter 9+. That moved Japan maybe 10 feet and you can see the damage that little bit of movement caused. That little bit of movement BTW, also shifted the entire planet an inch or so.
Now just THINK for a moment.
Suppose the ENTIRE CONTINENT of Africa and South America JUMPED 500 MILES in one day.
That would be so massive a movement NOTHING on land OR sea would have survived.
It would have made the Chixulub meteroid, which left a scar 180 miles across, look like a pebble hitting a pond.
There would have been MASSIVE volcanism that would have wiped out EVERY bit of life on Earth, maybe even bacteria.
Tell me that is not what he is saying, PLEASE.
21 Aug 13
Originally posted by sonhouseYou are making a strawman argument again. You know he did not say that.
So he is saying South America and Africa spread apart in bunches, where one bump say, added 500 miles in one day?
Tell me that is not what he means.
If so, just imagine for a moment the amount of energy expended in the Japan earthquake which peaked out at a Richter 9+. That moved Japan maybe 10 feet and you can see the damage that little bit of move ...[text shortened]... ERY bit of life on Earth, maybe even bacteria.
Tell me that is not what he is saying, PLEASE.
The Instructor
21 Aug 13
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, that's why I asked. YOU said it. Which makes perfect sense since you haven't got the common sense of an ant.
You are making a strawman argument again. You know he did not say that.
The Instructor
Is he for instance, denying that Africa and South America were once part of one continent?