Originally posted by blakbuzzrdI guess I insulted you some where along the way?
Come on, wittywonka, give the kid a break.
Let's remember that each Christian plays a different role within the body of Christ. Nemesio, for example, I would say is probably an eye, or part of the brain. You might consider yourself a finger or toe in that body. Jaywill is lint in the belly button, or maybe a wad of earwax.
And KellyJay is most like ...[text shortened]... h end of the northbound body of Christ.
And that's okay, man. We all have our part to play.
Kelly
Originally posted by timebombtedYou should learn to read slowly too to grasp points others are making
Those who believe in god have blind faith, no different than those who believe in santa claus, the boogey man, spaghetti monster, tooth fairy, imaginery friend etc etc. Its interesting that when you progress beyond childhood years you stop believing in things that have no credit....... interesting that people persist with god.
Science is not blind fai ...[text shortened]... hrough evidence, testing, statistical significance, repetition etc etc no blind faith required.
while your at it.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayNo indecision here KJ - Your posts have indicated both in the past, and no I'm not going to waste my time trolling past debates to get exact quotes. You know it to be true, so do many others.
What are you accusing me of, saying science is faith, or that there is
a level of faith in science, make up your mind?
Kelly
Either way; science is not faith, neither does it require a level of faith to ascertain its knowledge....... just evidence.
Originally posted by twhitehead
Why do creationists keep trying to make out that scientific theories are atheistic in nature? The vast majority of Christians in the world today accept both evolution and the big bang theory as fact (or are simply not educated enough to know what they are). Many, probably even the majority of scientists are Christian or at least theist.
Originally posted by KellyJay
Lets see, God is not required to make the universe as if an atheist
knew what was required to make a universe. Seems like that is a
strong belief, as strong as mine with regard to God did it.
Kelly
Are you replying to the question or going off on a tangent? It looks as if you are avoiding the question.
As far as science is concerned, there is no known reason why God would be required to make a universe. That doesn't translate into a claim that they know what is required as you wrongly imply and then call 'strong belief'. Your beliefs are beliefs because you claim to know but do not have any thing to back it up with.
Originally posted by timebombtedQuote me than so I know what you are refering to.
No indecision here KJ - Your posts have indicated both in the past, and no I'm not going to waste my time trolling past debates to get exact quotes. You know it to be true, so do many others.
Either way; science is not faith, neither does it require a level of faith to ascertain its knowledge....... just evidence.
If you are unwilling to back up your dribble stop making them.
It isn't my fault your lazy.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayHey Kelly with your superior reading skills and powers of understanding why dont you digest the following material http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
Quote me than so I know what you are refering to.
If you are unwilling to back up your dribble stop making them.
It isn't my fault your lazy.
Kelly
It will clearly show and explain to you that science does not require faith or any level of it, it has no place in science, only evidence which leads to the facts we have today.
This may even help you to stop talking dribble..........however I know you will refuse to read any of this.
Originally posted by KellyJaySomething from nothing is not a logically coherent question.
My point in responce to Scott? I don't believe God came from nothing
since I believe God always was, my point to someone else, quote me
so I know what exactly you are refering to.
Kelly
Come back when you have one.