Go back
To change your

To change your "mind"

Spirituality

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
08 Oct 17

Presumably josephw and sonship were enjoying a few self-righteous sniggers back when robbie carrobie was accusing me of being a pedophile in his attempt to discredit my writing here.

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
10 Oct 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Presumably josephw and sonship were enjoying a few self-righteous sniggers back when robbie carrobie was accusing me of being a pedophile in his attempt to discredit my writing here.
I gave no credence to that accusation. Then or now.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
10 Oct 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @josephw
I gave no credence to that accusation. Then or now.
So what's with your disgraceful ad hominem copy paste in your first post on this thread? It did not address the OP and merely sought to poison the well with regards to Dawkins' writing.

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @fmf
So what's with your disgraceful ad hominem copy paste in your first post on this thread? It did not address the OP and merely sought to poison the well with regards to Dawkins' writing.
Dawkins' writings are poison.

Why don't you point out Dawkins' disgraceful ad hominem attacks against the God he doesn't know and the Christians he labels delusional?

I'll tell you why. It's because you're in the same camp. Everything you post about God, His Word and Jesus is designed to undermine the Christian faith. You, like Dawkins, appear to make it your mission to dismantle faith in God like little antichrists.

The gates of hell will not prevail against God's church in this world irrespective of yours and Dawkins attempts to do so.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @josephw
Dawkins' writings are poison.
Then offer your critique. Your 1st post on page 1 was a disgrace. If his writings are "poison" you should be able to make the case by addressing his writings not by offering your own poison.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @fmf
Then offer your critique. Your 1st post on page 1 was a disgrace. If his writings are "poison" you should be able to make the case by addressing his writings not by offering your own poison.
Hear hear.

apathist
looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @josephw
I don't think so. We are what we think. The ideas, thoughts and words we use reflects who and what we are when we express those ideas, thoughts and words related to the meaning of life and living.
We are not our thoughts. We are not what we think. Many of us can think anything we can imagine. We can often argue the other view better than the proponents! Logic and reason are just tools that some people are good with.

apathist
looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @josephw
MY PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF RICHARD DAWKINS
...
I have some education about psychology, and I suspect that we've learned about josephw here.

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
10 Oct 17

Originally posted by @apathist
I have some education about psychology, and I suspect that we've learned about josephw here.
Makes no difference to me what you think you've learned.

apathist
looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
Clock
11 Oct 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @josephw
Makes no difference to me what you think you've learned.
If that were true, you wouldn't have responded.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.