Originally posted by scherzo*Laughter*
No, I'm SERIOUS. There's a PURPLE UNICORN outside my WINDOW!! It must be a sign of Jesus' resurrection!!!!
I'm Christian now!!
*Applause*
For our next comedian we have a rising talent of the Spirituality Forum - SCHERZO !!
Give it up for SCERZO folks !!
Music
Applause
Originally posted by scherzoawesome logic
It's easy. Don't take it personally; it would be easy for anyone.
There is no Messiah.
Therefore:
Fabian, you are not the Messiah.
Now an indirect proof:
Assume that Fabian is the Messiah. This would mean that there was a Messiah, which would contradict the fact that there isn't. Therefore Fabian is not the Messiah.
Originally posted by daniel58probably not but what if?
Aliens don't exist.
What if the 'invasion' has already taken place.
And in another sense are we not aliens? Alienated from each other and the rest of the universe because of our beliefs and fears.
It takes a wise man to admit when he is deluded.
Originally posted by buckkyIf Jesus appeared in the sky and only addressed issues with Christianity and totally ignored the multitude of other religions then yeah, there'd be no point taking it seriously. If he addressed the issues with every religion as well as with agnosticism, atheism, faith whalism (not that there could be any issues with that one), etc., then it'd be worth listening to. But pretending that only one religion has issues, and having no religion or having every other religion is perfection -- that's bogus. But just think of how annoying it'd be, for him to have to repeat his message in every single language until everyone on the planet heard what they got right and what they got wrong.
If Jesus appeared in the sky so that all on earth could see, and he told the masses down here that Christianity sort of messed up the story about his stay here on earth. He corrected a few of the obvious misconceptions, about Hell, and the nature of the Father as being this blood thristy angry guy. Many other ridiculous things held within the Christian religi ...[text shortened]... rick from the Devil, and still hang onto the crazy belief system they so seem to find rational ?
Originally posted by buckkyI think there is nothing in principle that precludes a level of evidence that god could provide that would predispose a rational agent to believe that god was real.
If Jesus appeared in the sky so that all on earth could see, and he told the masses down here that Christianity sort of messed up the story about his stay here on earth. He corrected a few of the obvious misconceptions, about Hell, and the nature of the Father as being this blood thristy angry guy. Many other ridiculous things held within the Christian religi ...[text shortened]... rick from the Devil, and still hang onto the crazy belief system they so seem to find rational ?
The question then moves on to why god doesn;t provide this. I'm open to suggestions, but I warn you, I've heard plenty, and they are lame so far. Still, dear reader, maybe you can do better?
Originally posted by jaywill
Your concept of the Father being a blood thirsty guy is only due to your not paying attention to too much else about the nature of God. That problem could be largly addressed simply by carefully reading the Bible through.
What, even th OT? How do you reconcile it then?