23 Jun 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadWhat's wrong with the conclusion? The reason I keep repeating it is because it doesn't seem to be sinking in.
You don't need much of an excuse to keep repeating your conclusion. It doesn't seem to matter to you whether the excuse makes sense.
Matter supports life. Do you have anything to say concerning that assertion? Do you believe it or not? Do you have an alternative conclusion concerning the relationship between life and raw matter other than that matter exists for the purpose of supporting life?
Originally posted by josephwOn Admiralty Island there are about 1600 bears (there are no resident humans.)
That's a reasonable idea.
I once read that it is difficult to discern whether the soil exists to support the plant or vice versa.
The salmon come to spawn, the bears eat them, the bears do what they do in the woods, the rain falls, the soil fills with nutrients, the plants thrive, as do bugs, birds, little critters. The locality is a net contributor of oxygen to the atmosphere, helping humans everywhere. The soil is an active beneficiary and contributor.
Except when a la nina delayed the salmon due to temperature. The bears almost starved, the soil almost starved, the eagles almost starved, etc.
Maybe it's not important to discern whether...etc.
The material world is indifferent as to whether life thrives. Generally in the vast expanse of the universe, life doesn't, and in the long run, it theoretically doesn't anywhere.
Originally posted by josephwMethinks this would be a good site for you to visit:
But that vacuum exists for a reason. It's all part of the purpose.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cognitive-biases-2014-6?op=1
Here's one that I think may be occurring in your noggin:
Observer-expectancy effect
A cousin of confirmation bias, here our expectations unconsciously influence how we perceive an outcome. Researchers looking for a certain result in an experiment, for example, may inadvertently manipulate or interpret the results to reveal their expectations. That's why the "double-blind" experimental design was created for the field of scientific research.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/cognitive-biases-2014-6?op=1#ixzz35YBlIb3T
Obviously I acknowledge that we can all suffer from these, skeptics included.
--- Penguin
24 Jun 14
Originally posted by JS357Jesus Christ holds the universe together by "the word of His power" on Admiralty Island as well: "And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high..." Hebrews 1:3 New American Standard Bible
On Admiralty Island there are about 1600 bears (there are no resident humans.)
The salmon come to spawn, the bears eat them, the bears do what they do in the woods, the rain falls, the soil fills with nutrients, the plants thrive, as do bugs, birds, little critters. The locality is a net contributor of oxygen to the atmosphere, helping humans everywhere. Th ...[text shortened]... t expanse of the universe, life doesn't, and in the long run, it theoretically doesn't anywhere.
24 Jun 14
Originally posted by PenguinSkepticism as a component of rationalism is often underrated: by definition it's an indication a search for facts is in progress.
Methinks this would be a good site for you to visit:
http://www.businessinsider.com/cognitive-biases-2014-6?op=1
Here's one that I think may be occurring in your noggin:
Observer-expectancy effect
A cousin of confirmation bias, here our expectations unconsciously influence how we perceive an outcome. Researchers looking for a certain ...[text shortened]...
Obviously I acknowledge that we can all suffer from these, skeptics included.
--- Penguin