Originally posted by AThousandYoungOh, you all might want to look up "Thought Terminating Cliche" and consider Zahlanzi's post in light of that concept.
It's the same reasoning used by Zahlanzi above:
i add god to the table. and i end all debate. god is the ultimate answer. and is easier to say god makes the sun work rather than say x amount of presure, y amount of heat that allows for fusion to give z amount of energy.
Originally posted by 667joefaith.
Getting back to my original post, no one has ever proved that anything was ever caused by god, whereas one by one many things thast were thought to be caused by god have been shown otherwise.
if you aren't satisfied with this word, you don't get the difference between science and religion
Originally posted by AThousandYoungNo such questions are raised unless you flatly fail to understand the meaning of 'the physical universe is an attribute of God'.
Because then you raise questions such as:
Does God exist where there is no star/sun?
Where exactly is that border between sun and not-sun?
How can this hypothesis help us create fusion power plants?
And most cripplingly...
Is this hypothesis falsifiable?
EDIT - And by Occam's Razor, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics is a better theory than Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Plus God.
The good news is that it makes absolutely no difference to your work as a scientist, so you can cheerfully disregard God.