Originally posted by darvlayI think a more accurate spread in that game is the Pats by 30...
The Steelers are a decent choice but their schedule is extremely light. Week 14 in New England will determine how far along that team is. But I agree, they do have a great D although let's face it - they barely won in Cleveland this week!
The reason the Cowboys nearly lost to the Bills is because the Bills are the most underrated team in the AFC and had ...[text shortened]... heir first loss in front of 80,000 screaming fans (myself included!). You heard it here first!
I do sincerely hope you enjoy the game though
Originally posted by darvlayThat Cleavland Browns game had me freaked, I couldn't believe they were doing that to the Steelers. I thought it was a pretty good game though, especially when Roethlisburger showed what kind of Athlete he is. Then I realized he came out of no where to push Tony Romo out of second place in the Quarter back chart. It looks like Roe is back. There really are some powerful sleepers still out there. Jax took Vince Young and the Titans to the wood shed. Bills I don't know much about as far as how they play NE, but unless is a big miracle, I would guess they are doomed. If I can get the game I wouldn't want to miss it. I have a feeling they can still bloody a few noses.
The Steelers are a decent choice but their schedule is extremely light. Week 14 in New England will determine how far along that team is. But I agree, they do have a great D although let's face it - they barely won in Cleveland this week!
The reason the Cowboys nearly lost to the Bills is because the Bills are the most underrated team in the AFC and had ...[text shortened]... heir first loss in front of 80,000 screaming fans (myself included!). You heard it here first!
Originally posted by cashthetrashThe NFL bumped the Chicago-Seattle game out of the 8:15pm Sunday Night game and gave it to the Pats-Bills so all of America can watch the odyssey: Quest for Hoodie.
That Cleavland Browns game had me freaked, I couldn't believe they were doing that to the Steelers. I thought it was a pretty good game though, especially when Roethlisburger showed what kind of Athlete he is. Then I realized he came out of no where to push Tony Romo out of second place in the Quarter back chart. It looks like Roe is back. There really ...[text shortened]... get the game I wouldn't want to miss it. I have a feeling they can still bloody a few noses.
Go Pats! Be there!
Originally posted by darvlayLoseman instead of Edwards. Do you agree, Darv?
Belichick has had 2 weeks to plan ahead for this game. No doubt he has cooked up some kind of crooked underhanded scheme to gain an advantage. A convenient misinterpretation of sorts. But PAY NO MIND! Put the entire house and practice down on the Bills, no1, you will not be sorry.
Originally posted by no1marauderYes - for now. Losman is the more mobile quarterback with the stronger arm but Edwards is the calm and cool pocket quarterback who gets rid of the ball much quicker. The problem with Losman is he is always getting hit for holding onto the ball too long, usually out of the pocket for a loss. However Losman has the ability and god-given talent to make the big play (more than once a game). In recent games he has shown the great chemistry with Lee Evans that produced more than a few 40+ yard TDs last season.
Loseman instead of Edwards. Do you agree, Darv?
I like the long-term upside for Edwards but I think Buffalo's gonna need the big plays if they're gonna have a chance in this game, so I like Losman against the Pats even though he is more susceptible to the pass rush. The key for Buffalo will be for them not to fall behind as quickly as the rest of the Pats' victims have, to pound the ball, let our underrated defense make some plays, keep the clock running and keep the game close. We'll see how it all works out.
In our first meeting this year, we held the Pats to three points almost through the entire first half but the game quickly fell apart. We were missing three starting DBs (including no. 1 CB McGee), Losman got injured in the first quarter and Brady-Moss were just too much. The D is a much more cohesive unit now and I expect them to perform much better than they did in that week 3 game.
Originally posted by darvlayLooking at their stats, they have 3 TD's (in 9 games!) and 8 INTs between them. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamStats?categoryId=67039
Yes - for now. Losman is the more mobile quarterback with the stronger arm but Edwards is the calm and cool pocket quarterback who gets rid of the ball much quicker. The problem with Losman is he is always getting hit for holding onto the ball too long, usually out of the pocket for a loss. However Losman has the ability and god-given talent to make the b ...[text shortened]... some plays, keep the clock running and keep the game close. We'll see how it all works out.
That sucks pretty bad, Darv; how many points do you think the Norwoods can put up against the Pats?
Originally posted by no1marauderHad to say the N-word, didn't you?
Looking at their stats, they have 3 TD's (in 9 games!) and 8 INTs between them. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamStats?categoryId=67039
That sucks pretty bad, Darv; how many points do you think the Norwoods can put up against the Pats?
But ya, the passing game has been pretty non-existent - up until NOW, that is.
I think the Bills could put up 3 TDs against the Pats.
Originally posted by no1marauderBad news: Lynch likely will not play on Sunday. 🙁
Looking at their stats, they have 3 TD's (in 9 games!) and 8 INTs between them. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamStats?categoryId=67039
That sucks pretty bad, Darv; how many points do you think the Norwoods can put up against the Pats?