Originally posted by RookRAKWho is going to do the pairing up? I know the first round is top half vs. bottom half (with 20 players 1 plays 11, 2 plays 12 .... 10 plays 20) but after the first round it gets more complicated. The best way to determine it is using a tournament manager program. I believe I have one somewhere.
Hey, if we can get one more eligible player to sign up, we'll have an even number and can get this tournament started. Who should we recruit? Both PBE6 and Phlabby were fairly frequent contributors in the early days of the dead-thread.
Also is each match a black and white game? This will wreak hell on the later pairings (as in a standard swiss a single game is played).
RookRAK hit me up on MSN (xanthosnz@gmail.com), yahoo or AIM (xanthosnz) or via PM and we'll work out details.
Originally posted by XanthosNZWe're going to play a pair of games each round, black/white, so you're right in this way it differs from traditional Swiss. However, that takes color assignment out of the assignment equation - leaving a totally straightforward algorithm.
Who is going to do the pairing up? I know the first round is top half vs. bottom half (with 20 players 1 plays 11, 2 plays 12 .... 10 plays 20) but after the first round it gets more complicated. The best way to determine it is using a tournament manager program. I believe I have one somewhere.
Also is each match a black and white game? This will wreak ...[text shortened]... up on MSN (xanthosnz@gmail.com), yahoo or AIM (xanthosnz) or via PM and we'll work out details.
There is software to do this, but it won't be needed. With only 20 or so people, and no color issue, and no byes, it's 5 minutes of work at most per round.
Originally posted by RookRAKYou mean you want to start this before 2006? 😕
Hey, if we can get one more eligible player to sign up, we'll have an even number and can get this tournament started. Who should we recruit? Both PBE6 and Phlabby were fairly frequent contributors in the early days of the dead-thread.
Originally posted by RookRAKI suppose if you view both 2-0 and 1.5-0.5 as wins and 1-1 as a draw then it works for result matching.
We're going to play a pair of games each round, black/white, so you're right in this way it differs from traditional Swiss. However, that takes color assignment out of the assignment equation - leaving a totally straightforward algorithm.
There is software to do this, but it won't be needed. With only 20 or so people, and no color issue, and no byes, it's 5 minutes of work at most per round.
Originally posted by XanthosNZI'm guessing he's just going to consider the point totals as what they are. So in the second round, people with 2 points are matched up, people with 1.5 are matched up, etc.
I suppose if you view both 2-0 and 1.5-0.5 as wins and 1-1 as a draw then it works for result matching.
Here's the current entry list, along with what the seeds would be if we started now.
You'll see I'm on a run and have clawed my way out of the #11 spot - the first person in the bottom half always plays the top seed in round 1.
A few people would like to wait until after the new year to start, so I'll see if I can round up a few more players.
1 seraphimvulture 1959
2 XanthosNZ 1930
3 ark13 1909
4 GalaxyShield 1677
5 Nordlys 1659
6 dottewell 1637
7 The Plumber 1633
8 Moldy Crow 1605
9 RookRAK 1561
10 darvlay 1527
11 murrow 1515
12 rhb 1484
13 Wildfire 1455
14 Bosse de Nage 1444
15 wucky3 1311
16 zakkwylder 1302
17 Aiko 1281
18 invigorate 1257
19 Freddie2004 1203
20 Whats goin on eh 1195