- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@no1marauder saidYa mean in the stone age?
Without private property?
Yes, I did. The same way families were raised for the vast majority of Man's existence on Earth when there was no such concept.
So you still have no evidence linking Joe Biden to any of Hunter's supposed misdeeds?
Yeah things were great .
Actually I think if Og made a nice obsidian axe he probably considered it his and if someone tried to take it Og would split their skull with it.
People have always had personal property.
If they had no concept of such then they were some kind of early proto-humans.
My dogs have toys that they consider theirs for chrissakes, and they guard them jealously.
@no1marauder saidYour dancing around this is quite obvious. A marauder tactic!
Without private property?
Yes, I did. The same way families were raised for the vast majority of Man's existence on Earth when there was no such concept.
So you still have no evidence linking Joe Biden to any of Hunter's supposed misdeeds?
Anyway, a person, who happens to be Hunter, has been keeping a running account of unusual, seeming unsavory activities of Joe Biden, our President. An example is evidenced by the gift of Millions and millions to Penn U and to the Penn Biden Institute.
This account is kept inside of a laptop which our government has possession of, which is the device the person, Hunter, used to collect and record all of he information. You correctly refer to the information that we are looking for as evidence. The extent of said evidence has not yet been published, as the authorities are properly taking their time.
So, when you glibly ask the forum for evidence, please know that it is not yet made known. Patience is a virtue.
You have NOT told us, after saying people should not privately own land, how a family is supposed to survive, safely and warmly. Please , Marauder. Why the dodging?
Here is link of the China Gift.
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-anonymous-chinese-donations-to-upenn-potentially-influenced-biden-administration-policies%EF%BF%BC/
PS: I have no idea what your 2nd sentence in your post means. No idea. Another tactic?
26 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidPersonal Property, yes.
Ya mean in the stone age?
Yeah things were great .
Actually I think if Og made a nice obsidian axe he probably considered it his and if someone tried to take it Og would split their skull with it.
People have always had personal property.
If they had no concept of such then they were some kind of early proto-humans.
My dogs have toys that they consider theirs for chrissakes, and they guard them jealously.
Private Property, no.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@no1marauder saidWhat's the difference?
Personal Property, yes.
Private Property, no.
(Waiting for some hair-splitting lecture about the meaning of words, as usual)
26 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidI gave the difference on page 6 of the "Illusion of Lipstick" thread.
What's the difference?
(Waiting for some hair-splitting lecture about the meaning of words, as usual)
Basically, if you personally possess and use something, it's personal property. Og's ax or hut would be an example.
If you merely claim ownership based on force or threat of force and require others to actually work for you in order to realize the bulk of value, then it is private property, a creation of the State. A factory or a 1000 acres of land would be an example in a capitalist or similar society.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
26 Jan 23
@no1marauder saidLOL...poor fool
I gave the difference on page 6 of the "Illusion of Lipstick" thread.
Basically, if you personally possess and use something, it's personal property. Og's ax or hut would be an example.
If you merely claim ownership based on force or threat of force and require others to actually work for you in order to realize the bulk of value, then it is private property, a crea ...[text shortened]... the State. A factory or a 1000 acres of land would be an example in a capitalist or similar society.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
26 Jan 23
@athousandyoung saidYou guys must have a different set of dictionaries than I do.
Personal property is the stuff you use. Private property is the stuff you own because it is valuable and is intended to be rented out for income.
@no1marauder saidMarauder will think I am feigning ignorance to his post...., but, really, what is he trying to say. This last paragraph is absolutely unbelievable. He never really gives us an example of the force that he repeats all the time. Have any of you forced anything upon anybody? And, what is this 'private poperty a creation of the state' stuff?? I own a few parcels of land, is that what ihe is calling private property? The law refers to that as Real Property', not private property. No lawyer refers to land as private property. Curious, Marauder......
I gave the difference on page 6 of the "Illusion of Lipstick" thread.
Basically, if you personally possess and use something, it's personal property. Og's ax or hut would be an example.
If you merely claim ownership based on force or threat of force and require others to actually work for you in order to realize the bulk of value, then it is private property, a crea ...[text shortened]... the State. A factory or a 1000 acres of land would be an example in a capitalist or similar society.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
27 Jan 23
@AverageJoe1
Forget it, these people change the meaning of words to suit themselves, like the Caterpillar in Alice In Wonderland.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
27 Jan 23
@athousandyoung saidLOL—-my God man, very child like
Personal property is the stuff you use. Private property is the stuff you own because it is valuable and is intended to be rented out for income.
this reminds me of elementary students answering questions
27 Jan 23
@averagejoe1 saidThese are economic terms not legal terms. Legally a piece of land is “primary residence” if it’s personal property and “investment property” if it’s private property. These are just different words for the same concept.
Marauder will think I am feigning ignorance to his post...., but, really, what is he trying to say. This last paragraph is absolutely unbelievable. He never really gives us an example of the force that he repeats all the time. Have any of you forced anything upon anybody? And, what is this 'private poperty a creation of the state' stuff?? I own a few parcels of land ...[text shortened]... rty', not private property. No lawyer refers to land as private property. Curious, Marauder......
https://www.realized1031.com/blog/investment-property-vs.-primary-residence-interest-rates-what-is-the-difference?hs_amp=true
27 Jan 23
@mott-the-hoople saidThat’s because JJ was whining about the use of precise definitions that might confuse him.
LOL—-my God man, very child like
this reminds me of elementary students answering questions
27 Jan 23
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidExample of force - you call the cops on a squatter in your investment home. This is the use of government force to protect the investment of a capitalist while simultaneously forcing a person into homelessness. This situation could not exist without a government to send police to evict the squatter.
Marauder will think I am feigning ignorance to his post...., but, really, what is he trying to say. This last paragraph is absolutely unbelievable. He never really gives us an example of the force that he repeats all the time. Have any of you forced anything upon anybody? And, what is this 'private poperty a creation of the state' stuff?? I own a few parcels of land ...[text shortened]... rty', not private property. No lawyer refers to land as private property. Curious, Marauder......
27 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidYou were complaining about how the definitions would be too abstract for you to understand so I dumbed it down for you
@AverageJoe1
Forget it, these people change the meaning of words to suit themselves, like the Caterpillar in Alice In Wonderland.