52d
@no1marauder saidThat way they could kill everyone still in their mothers womb and not worry about anything!
Well, if the Democrats ever get control of the WH and Congress then could jettison the filibuster and put say 10 new justices on the SCOTUS who will recognize a women's right to bodily sovereignty.
@shavixmir saidYou do not seem to understand, that ALL that SCOTUS did was determine that it is a State issue, not a federal issue. Not too hard, man. So they sent it to the States. It is the law, no insanity whatsoever. How is it insane? IT is the law. YOu want to change the law. I am curious what you want to change it t. YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismembering children in the womb. This is not some dr pulling a 3 week embryo. So if you come up with a new way to have the law, keep that in mind.
1. It’s not uncontrolled abortion. Making abortions illegal forces it to become uncontrolled.
2. Just change the law. Effectively putting the high court’s verdict in the bin of insanity.
52d
@AverageJoe1 saidbig words, pumpkin. Did you copy them from the fox news collection of what to say when debating someone smarter?
You do not seem to understand, that ALL that SCOTUS did was determine that it is a State issue, not a federal issue. Not too hard, man. So they sent it to the States. It is the law, no insanity whatsoever. How is it insane? IT is the law. YOu want to change the law. I am curious what you want to change it t. YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismemb ...[text shortened]... me dr pulling a 3 week embryo. So if you come up with a new way to have the law, keep that in mind.
Alito played leapfrog with a bunch of nonsense old arguments, some poorly quoted, some from old dipshts who died a hundred or more years ago.
The result of "leaving it to the states" is that some taliban backward red state where they didn't hear of soap and still boink their cousins can pass gruesome laws that harm women.
No man will ever die bleeding because of a miscarriage and because doctors were bullied into inaction. No man will go septic because of an ectopic pregnancy. No man will have to account for the reason he was out of state.
Just women. Which is the bloody point. Controlling women in states where they might outvote the men. Keep the women servile, at home if possible and cranking out children
"YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismembering children in the womb"
You're a lying piece of excrement and that never happened
52d
@Zahlanzi said"YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismembering children in the womb"
big words, pumpkin. Did you copy them from the fox news collection of what to say when debating someone smarter?
Alito played leapfrog with a bunch of nonsense old arguments, some poorly quoted, some from old dipshts who died a hundred or more years ago.
The result of "leaving it to the states" is that some taliban backward red state where they didn't hear of soap an ...[text shortened]... ng and dismembering children in the womb"
You're a lying piece of excrement and that never happened
You're a lying piece of excrement and that never happened
Wow, when your heads up your arse, everything looks rosy huh.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidnone of you seem to understand your own law process. Geez. Roe v wade ruling was that states can't ban abortion. 2 years ago the Supreme Court overturned that ruling allowing states to again ban abortion.
democrats are making a big issue on abortion.
What do you think harris can do to bring uncontrolled abortion back?
So, what EXACTLY are the democrats going to do? Pass a law that allows abortion nationwide regardless of the laws of each state? Ok, but what happens then when that law gets appealed to the supreme court? The SC would have to decide if the Fed government's law over-riding states' law is constitutional.
And what do you think the SC will rule on that question? They will overturn that law.
So, people vote for the democrats hoping the democrats create a law that will be overturned by the SC.
You lot are crazy.
@Zahlanzi saidTry making one point. We should stipulate that it is clear in the Constitution that feds aint got nothing to do with abortion, it belongs in the states. I have actually helped you, your post will now be only half as long.
big words, pumpkin. Did you copy them from the fox news collection of what to say when debating someone smarter?
Alito played leapfrog with a bunch of nonsense old arguments, some poorly quoted, some from old dipshts who died a hundred or more years ago.
The result of "leaving it to the states" is that some taliban backward red state where they didn't hear of soap an ...[text shortened]... ng and dismembering children in the womb"
You're a lying piece of excrement and that never happened
@AverageJoe1 saidThere are no "state" issues.
You do not seem to understand, that ALL that SCOTUS did was determine that it is a State issue, not a federal issue. Not too hard, man. So they sent it to the States. It is the law, no insanity whatsoever. How is it insane? IT is the law. YOu want to change the law. I am curious what you want to change it t. YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismemb ...[text shortened]... me dr pulling a 3 week embryo. So if you come up with a new way to have the law, keep that in mind.
Surely not among the basic human rights issues.
Do you really think women in California have more of a right to control their own bodies than a woman in Oklahoma?
How can you think a child in New York City has more of a right to see their 15th birthday free from gun violence than a kid in Topeka?
"States' rights" is just an excuse. An excuse to control lives like the Third Reich used to control lives.
One of the fundemental ideas of the US Constitution is that people EVERYWHERE are guaranteed the SAME rights. You'd throw out the Bill of Rights too, claiming that people in one state need less rights than someone in another state.
"States' rights" is a LIE.
@AverageJoe1 saidMaybe you should learn to read one day, so that the next day, you could actually read and understand one of our foundational documents.
Try making one point. We should stipulate that it is clear in the Constitution that feds aint got nothing to do with abortion, it belongs in the states. I have actually helped you, your post will now be only half as long.
@uzless saidLook at the non-American telling us how to run our country.
none of you seem to understand your own law process. Geez. Roe v wade ruling was that states can't ban abortion. 2 years ago the Supreme Court overturned that ruling allowing states to again ban abortion.
So, what EXACTLY are the democrats going to do? Pass a law that allows abortion nationwide regardless of the laws of each state? Ok, but what happens then when that l ...[text shortened]... democrats hoping the democrats create a law that will be overturned by the SC.
You lot are crazy.
@DJJ saidMore like, when your head's up your arse, everything looks shi--y.
"YOu are aware of the ghouls who are killing and dismembering children in the womb"
You're a lying piece of excrement and that never happened
Wow, when your heads up your arse, everything looks rosy huh.
Isn't that the message of "head up your arse" Trumpublicans?
That everything, and I mean EVERYthing in this country is "shi--y"?
@Zahlanzi saidExactly.
The result of "leaving it to the states" is that some taliban backward red state where they didn't hear of soap and still boink their cousins can pass gruesome laws that harm women.
No man will ever die bleeding because of a miscarriage and because doctors were bullied into inaction. No man will go septic because of an ectopic pregnancy. No man will have to account for ...[text shortened]... re they might outvote the men. Keep the women servile, at home if possible and cranking out children