30 May 23
@sonhouse saidBOO!
@AverageJoe1
I SAID what I noticed was the LACK of certain stories, like ANYTHING to do with Trump's legal difficulties or anything out of country like Uganda just passing a law allowing execution of gays. You didn't see THAT there either did you?
And how much did Blaze discuss the law just passed in Idaho criminalizing a girl crossing state line for abortion say in Washington state.
Glen Beck is just to the right of Genghis Khan.....
31 May 23
@AverageJoe1
That's your big answer? So you just don't WANT know about anything but how your 401K and your millions invested goes, forget actual policy, since you don't know what repub policy actually is. If you find out, please tell us so we know how to react.
31 May 23
1 edit
@sonhouse saidRepublicans only have one policy.
@AverageJoe1
That's your big answer? So you just don't WANT know about anything but how your 401K and your millions invested goes, forget actual policy, since you don't know what repub policy actually is. If you find out, please tell us so we know how to react.
For things benefitting themselves, say YES.
For things benefitting people not like them (you know, not white, not male, not rich), say NO.
@suzianne saidsuzi, you've become fanatical maniacal retardical. It's blatantly racist.***
..you know, not white, not male, not rich.
Everyone knows of non-white, non-male, poor republicans. shag doody regularly makes fun of, and speaks derogatorily of, working class republicans who for a million reasons may find themselves in a trailer park. You've completely lost it with your rantings, have the nano machines entered your brain, you can see how ridiculous such statements are.
Can't any of your allies; kev bamboozle, zahlooney bamboozle or pseud boy known as shag doody for brains take you to one side and have a chat. Calm you down a little?
***It reminds me of the time zahlooney bamboozle started a thread about a mildly known hispanic identity who openly declared his support of Trump. zahlooney racistically felt that hispanic people had some gene or something in their DNA that made it impossible for persons of that race to support Trump. The way zahlooney dropped that hot potato when his own racism was pointed out still gives me a chuckle.
@sonhouse saidWhy tell you, since we already know how you will react.
@AverageJoe1
That's your big answer? So you just don't WANT know about anything but how your 401K and your millions invested goes, forget actual policy, since you don't know what repub policy actually is. If you find out, please tell us so we know how to react.
Answer what? Aska. a question in normal parlance, maybe someone will answer it (maaybe even read it) for you.
Just too much, Sonhouse. All of your posts are the same. Sorry.
You see, I had asked you to answer what someone said, and your answer starts with 'What they did NOT say", so I did not read the rest of your post. Why do you not get that?
31 May 23
@suzianne saidJust a little bit of debate tutelage....95% of your (posts? comnents?) are unfounded, lack basis. Ironic that your posting here is right next to Sonhouse, Stange Debate Fellows.
Republicans only have one policy.
For things benefitting themselves, say YES.
For things benefitting people not like them (you know, not white, not male, not rich), say NO.
31 May 23
@Wajoma
All well and good but repubs have publicly stated they HAVE NO POLICY to bring.
Now we see just how weak McCarthy has turned out to be. He is a pathetic imitation of a speaker of the house.
The debt limit bill running through now is a total Biden victory because Biden knew the ultrarightwing caucus was deathly afraid of default and he used that brilliantly and THAT is DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLICY. You know, that part where they are supposed to make laws that actually HELP people?
Instead repubs are making laws with the purpose of making more people criminal, just as the POS draconian law just passed in Idaho, a girl crossing state lines to seek abortion where it is legal, now can be thrown in jail by Idaho FOR CROSSING STATE LINES.
Tell me Waj, are laws like that what you think governing should be all about?
31 May 23
@sonhouse saidI'm a libertarian sonhouse. Just pointing out suzi's obvious racism, and how ridiculous it is to generalise repubs by race, gender or wealth.
@Wajoma
All well and good but repubs have publicly stated they HAVE NO POLICY to bring.
Now we see just how weak McCarthy has turned out to be. He is a pathetic imitation of a speaker of the house.
The debt limit bill running through now is a total Biden victory because Biden knew the ultrarightwing caucus was deathly afraid of default and he used that brilliantly and THA ...[text shortened]... OSSING STATE LINES.
Tell me Waj, are laws like that what you think governing should be all about?
She's ranting like an ijit.
31 May 23
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidYou misspelled "completely on point".
Just a little bit of debate tutelage....95% of your (posts? comnents?) are unfounded, lack basis. Ironic that your posting here is right next to Sonhouse, Stange Debate Fellows.
Because I like making snowflakes cry.
31 May 23
1 edit
@wajoma saidA far-right-wing libertarian... maybe. You keep acting like a fringe Republican.
I'm a libertarian sonhouse. Just pointing out suzi's obvious racism, and how ridiculous it is to generalise repubs by race, gender or wealth.
She's ranting like an ijit.
Ranting like an ijit is what you do when you talk about "bleeps".
"Bleeps". But that's not racist, huh? Ijit. Why not go full-on with the N-word for us?
31 May 23
@sonhouse saidGovernment, at least in America, SHOULD "establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"... NOTHING LESS will do.
@Wajoma
Tell me Waj, are laws like that what you think governing should be all about?
Instead, we have the Party of NO, screwing things up for the rest of us. They sure work hard to "secure the blessings of liberty" for their OWN selves, though.
31 May 23
@suzianne saidPoint of order. He is being gracious, Sue, to say bleep instead of writing the actual culture of the protaganists who run wild in our streets with intent to kill. You see, if he said 'Those Hoodies', it would make you and me and people like Sonhouse and Kev prejudiced against Hoodies.
A far-right-wing libertarian... maybe. You keep acting like a fringe Republican.
Ranting like an ijit is what you do when you talk about "bleeps".
"Bleeps". But that's not racist, huh? Ijit. Why not go full-on with the N-word for us?
I am surprised that you don't get that. well, maybe not surprised.
@suzianne saidYou're the one that tries to fuse 'bleeps' with the word that rhymes with bigger, but starts with the letter between M and O, that is an anagram of ginger.
A far-right-wing libertarian... maybe. You keep acting like a fringe Republican.
Ranting like an ijit is what you do when you talk about "bleeps".
"Bleeps". But that's not racist, huh? Ijit. Why not go full-on with the N-word for us?
You're the one that does that suzi.
I use bleeps because I know what it means, you know what it means and it's safer than the rest of the constantly changing, difficult to keep up with, politically correct terms for bleeps.
It is you that sees 'bleeps' and then inserts the N word. Not me.
Edit: BTW please define what you mean by far-right, then provide some example of myself being far-right. Then when you cannot do so, please offer an overdue apology and retraction. (A sure fired way to send suzi scurrying.)
31 May 23
@wajoma saidI always put it this way...Libs do not answer questions.
You're the one that tries to fuse 'bleeps' with the word that rhymes with bigger, but starts with the letter between M and O, that is an anagram of ginger.
You're the one that does that suzi.
I use bleeps because I know what it means, you know what it means and it's safer than the rest of the constantly changing, difficult to keep up with, politically correct terms fo ...[text shortened]... ot do so, please offer an overdue apology and retraction. (A sure fired way to send suzi scurrying.)
Prove me wrong Sue.
Or, ask me a question, if you still want to be relative on the thread.
01 Jun 23
@AverageJoe1
What do you mean IF he had millions floating around, getting from odd places.
Does the digital card scam come to mind? Millions gotten from dumb folks who actually thought they were valuable.
Or the two BILLION the Trump family got from the Saudi's.
Or the legal fund scam that netted him near a quarter billion.
I guess because that is all from Trump, it redefines the word scam so all those things are normalized now.