Go back
Abundance of Caution??? WTF?

Abundance of Caution??? WTF?

Debates


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Like the J&J vaccine, the AstraZeneca vaccine is a viral vector vaccine.
The FDA says viral vectors are gene therapy.
Putting the word vaccine on the end changes nothing.
They are gene therapy by the FDA's own criteria.


The Pfizer vaccine might give people the chicken pox virus?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/20/herpes-infection-possibly-linked-to-covid-19-vaccine/

I had chicken pox as a child so it is not lethal, but how the heck did an unrelated virus get into the vaccine? They must have already had it and the mRNA triggered an outbreak do to an immune problem.



The post that was quoted here has been removed
Pfizer said 6 to 12 months.
Netanyahu from Israel said possibly every 6 months to Israelis.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I'm sure antibodies will wane over time, but the T-cells generated by the immune reaction are likely to stick around for a while, possibly reducing COVID to the status of cold/flu. I'm not convinced that annual boosters will be needed even if antibodies produced by the vaccine do fade.

If they are needed, they will likely become part of the flu shot, as Moderna is working on now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The pause has been lifted.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/92262

No information has come to light that reduces the odds that the clotting was caused by the vax. If anything, reports of clotting incidents accelerated in the past couple of weeks.

So, they stopped the administration. Then because enough time passed (I guess) they re-started it because the benefits outweigh the risks after all. Got it. Awesome work, fellas.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
The pause has been lifted.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/92262

No information has come to light that reduces the odds that the clotting was caused by the vax. If anything, reports of clotting incidents accelerated in the past couple of weeks.

So, they stopped the administration. Then because enough time passed (I guess) they re-started it because the benefits outweigh the risks after all. Got it. Awesome work, fellas.
That seems like a particularly stupid guess.

The panel looked at more evidence and recommended a warning label. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/a-cdc-panel-recommends-jandj-shots-restart-with-a-label-noting-the-risk-of-very-rare-blood-clots/ar-BB1fXUbn?li=BBnb7Kz

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
That seems like a particularly stupid guess.
You know perfectly well I was being facetious. I've read 5 articles and scores of tweets from people who know what they're talking about in the past few minutes. The vote today was all about risk/benefit analysis and I see no information that wasn't available 10 days ago. If anything, the information has gotten WORSE for the J&J vaccine since then.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.