02 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by adam warlockNot if I could prevent it; nor would I "let" my 18 or 19 year old work in those conditions; nor my 34 or 35 year old.
Would you let your 15/16 year old son work in the condition that are available in these types of jobs?
Sweatshop conditions that is.
What does that have to do with whether there's anything morally wrong with Chinese rules that allow 15 year old factory workers?
How do you know the Apple factories are "sweatshops" in any case?
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by sh76What does that have to do with whether there's anything morally wrong with Chinese rules that allow 15 year old factory workers?
What does that have to do with whether there's anything morally wrong with Chinese rules that allow 15 year old factory workers?
How do you know the Apple factories are "sweatshops" in any case?
It doesn't have much to do with it. You're right in that respect, but just tell me why wouldn't you allow them to work like that. Certainly you something that isn't right with it.
How do you know the Apple factories are "sweatshops" in any case?
I'm assuming the most likely event given the fact that abroad factories from Apple are in China Taiwan, Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Czech Republic. All very well known countries that use child labor in sweatshops. Most of the time the children have to work more than 12 hours a day for less than a dollar.In reality this is a very complicated affair, but just brushing it off with the argument that we 15 year are biological adults isn't much of an excuse. I don't think that the problem is that they work at 15, but the (most likely conditions) that they work at 15.
02 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by adam warlock[/b]There is child labour in sweatshops in the Czech Republic. Really?
[b]What does that have to do with whether there's anything morally wrong with Chinese rules that allow 15 year old factory workers?
It doesn't have much to do with it. You're right in that respect, but just tell me why wouldn't you allow them to work like that. Certainly you something that isn't right with it.
How do you know the Apple roblem is that they work at 15, but the (most likely conditions) that they work at 15.
The Czech Republic has universal, free, mantatory education up to the age of 15.
02 Mar 10
I don't know why Apple is being picked on here when there are far worse offenders. You would have to go to great lengths to truely avoid child labor these day, and really what's the point? If a kid is forced to choose between a sweat shop and starvation, is the latter any better?
This rock and hard place scenerio makes the case for government regulated capitalism.
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperUnregulated capitalism is a contradiction in terms.
I don't know why Apple is being picked on here when there are far worse offenders. You would have to go to great lengths to truely avoid child labor these day, and really what's the point? If a kid is forced to choose between a sweat shop and starvation, is the latter any better?
This rock and hard place scenerio makes the case for government regulated capitalism.
02 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThere is child labour in sweatshops in the Czech Republic. Really?
There is child labour in sweatshops in the Czech Republic. Really?
The Czech Republic has universal, free, mantatory education up to the age of 15.
http://www.euro.who.int/eehc/implementation/20050908_1
02 Mar 10
2 edits
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperBe assured that I pick on all of them: http://www.laborrights.org/sites/default/files/publications-and-resources/sweatshop_hall_shame_2010.pdf
I don't know why Apple is being picked on here when there are far worse offenders.
Yes you're right. Between having to starve to death or having to work 12 plus hours shifts to earn something like a dollar a day is a very hard choice, but in my view people that live in the countries where such corporations are based should really press them for good working conditions of the nationals where the factories are placed.
It's not about working at 15/16 (even though this still is relevant), it is about the working conditions these people have to face.
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by adam warlockYour link seems to underscore my point? Child prostitution is certainly an issue, but there are no "sweatshops" making products for the western world - they are part of it.
b]There is child labour in sweatshops in the Czech Republic. Really?
http://www.euro.who.int/eehc/implementation/20050908_1[/b]
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by adam warlockYou make the case that there is such a thing as 'the violence of poverty'. It's interesting that libertarians refuse to see this as a form of "force". Indeed, their refusal is a kind of "fraud". Whoops. The two wheels of the WajomaWorld philosophy have fallen off.
Yes you're right between having to starve to death or having to work 12 plush hours shifts to earn something like a dollar a day is a very hard choice, but in view people that live in the countries where such corporations are based should really press them for good working conditions.
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by KazetNagorra"We do not consider child labour to be a pressing problem in the Czech Republic. Generally speaking, it is banned. Exceptions certainly do exist."
Your link seems to underscore my point? Child prostitution is certainly an issue, but there are no "sweatshops" making products for the western world - they are part of it.
"the actual health risk following from child labour... has been brought down to a reasonable level"
"To a limited extent, child labour might be used or misused in small family enterprises, farms, and services. This is certainly not a frequent event"
"With the liberalization of society in 1989, a steep increase in the crime rate occurred along with the exploitation of children for illegal income and activities. The public health protection authorities have no information about such activities. Those problems are in the competence of police and other authorities conducting criminal proceedings. In any case, the scope of those activities is not likely to be alarming due to the compulsory school attendance mentioned above, along with the quite strict system of checking up on it. It should be stressed that along with its limited scope, the problem applies mainly to the socially deprived segments of the population."
So there indeed is a problem of child labor in poor conditions even though it doesn't seem to be an alarming one. But still it exists.
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by FMFI don't know if I correctly understood what you try to say but for me laissez-faire capitalism is a a very strong form of coercion: People have to to work in order to have salaries in order to not to starve to death.
You make the case that there is such a thing as 'the violence of poverty'. It's interesting that libertarians refuse to see this as a form of "force". Indeed, their refusal is a kind of "fraud". Whoops. The two wheels of the WajomaWorld philosophy have fallen off.
And the poorer you are the more you'll be likely to endure just to not to see yourself or your family to starve to death.
What are the two wheels of the WajomaWorld philosophy, by the way?
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by FMFHmmmm. Aren't you oversimplifying? 😛
"No force". "No fraud". Everything else is alright.
But if you remove force and fraud from the world I think most of its problems would be solved, don't you think so too.
The only problem, of course, would be an agreement on the definitions of force and fraud.
02 Mar 10
Originally posted by adam warlockWell, I'd alter that to that I'd concede that there's something that's not pleasant about it. I wouldn't want my children to work in those factories because I envision and will try to help build a better life for them; not because I believe there's an inherent immorality in 15 year olds working.
[b]What does that have to do with whether there's anything morally wrong with Chinese rules that allow 15 year old factory workers?
It doesn't have much to do with it. You're right in that respect, but just tell me why wouldn't you allow them to work like that. Certainly you something that isn't right with it.[/b]
In any case, maybe the Apple factories are "sweatshops" and maybe they work 7.5 hours a day with 4 coffee breaks and have 4 weeks of paid vacation a year. I don't know. But I didn't see any indication from the article that this is a "sweatshop" and in any case, that's not what the subject of the controversy was- the subject was age. Working conditions are another matter.