Go back
Are Christians tolerant?

Are Christians tolerant?

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
Anything that has to do with morality has to do with religion. The only question is whether or not you are willing to admit that your worldviews are based on some set of assumed 'facts'. Not one of your assumed fact is a fact at all, it is simply an opinion based on some worldview or 'religious' belief depending on how wants to frame one's beliefs.
Clearly all moral codes are built on some axioms, but I don't see how that makes all moral codes "religion". Algebra is based on certain axioms, does that make algebra a religion?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Clearly all moral codes are built on some axioms, but I don't see how that makes all moral codes "religion". Algebra is based on certain axioms, does that make algebra a religion?
I believe I limited it to topics of morality. If one basis one's morality on Algebra, then I suppose it could be described as a religous belief.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
I believe I limited it to topics of morality. If one basis one's morality on Algebra, then I suppose it could be described as a religous belief.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised; this isn't the first time you arbitrarily redefine words to give them completely different meanings as a discussion technique.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised; this isn't the first time you arbitrarily redefine words to give them completely different meanings as a discussion technique.
It isn't a discussion technique. It is a statement of fact that certain people just don't want to admit. It appears that you are one such person. I'm not really surprised.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by normbenign
An example would be an atheist who holds that extra marital sex is a bad thing.

Opposition to abortion based not on any religious grounds.
I don't see how that follows that the belief that extra marital sex being a bad thing or being anti-abortion being religious morals outside of the fact that it would be a moral judgement that they have in common.

By that logic then thinking murder is bad would be a "religious moral".

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
I don't see how that follows that the belief that extra marital sex being a bad thing or being anti-abortion being religious morals outside of the fact that it would be a moral judgement that they have in common.

By that logic then thinking murder is bad would be a "religious moral".
That's a fair point. Why is murder wrong?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dryhump
That's a fair point. Why is murder wrong?
It's wrong because it deprives life from another human being for one.

Do you think it's wrong just because the bible (or another holy book) said so?

What if the commandment said "Thou shalt kill a random innocent stranger periodically" would you have no qualms about killing someone?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let's not pretend that a human embryo at whatever stage doesn't constitute life. Abortion is the ending of a life. There may be valid reasons to do so, but that's what it is. Any attempt to argue otherwise is completely dishonest. If you disagree with that statement, I want you to consider for a moment how you would feel if the Mars rovers discovered a single celled organism on the red planet.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dryhump
Let's not pretend that a human embryo at whatever stage doesn't constitute life. Abortion is the ending of a life. There may be valid reasons to do so, but that's what it is. Any attempt to argue otherwise is completely dishonest. If you disagree with that statement, I want you to consider for a moment how you would feel if the Mars rovers discovered a single celled organism on the red planet.
Let's not pretend this thread is about abortion. There are other threads for that debate.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
It's wrong because it deprives life from another human being for one.

Do you think it's wrong just because the bible (or another holy book) said so?

What if the commandment said "Thou shalt kill a random innocent stranger periodically" would you have no qualms about killing someone?
Why does it matter if you deprive another human being of life, though? I ate sausage this morning. At one point the pig that the sausage was made from was alive. Am I in the wrong to deprive the pig of life? The bible doesn't have a commandment like that.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
It's wrong because it deprives life from another human being for one.

Why is that wrong?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dryhump
Why does it matter if you deprive another human being of life, though? I ate sausage this morning. At one point the pig that the sausage was made from was alive. Am I in the wrong to deprive the pig of life? The bible doesn't have a commandment like that.
Actually, the bible does have a commandment against eating pigs. The old testament does at least. I'll assume that you can understand why a pig isn't directly analogous to a human being and hence why your analogy isn't good.

What do you mean by "matter"? really? Is it important?

Morality is merely a set of rules that society has developed that governs our behavior. It is ingrained that when we deprive another human being of a life then this is contrary to our society's growth and health.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dryhump
Let's not pretend that a human embryo at whatever stage doesn't constitute life. Abortion is the ending of a life. There may be valid reasons to do so, but that's what it is. Any attempt to argue otherwise is completely dishonest. If you disagree with that statement, I want you to consider for a moment how you would feel if the Mars rovers discovered a single celled organism on the red planet.
Calling a one celled organism a "human being" is dishonest. If the Mars rover discovered one celled organisms we wouldn't pretend it had discovered "human beings".

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
Actually, the bible does have a commandment against eating pigs. The old testament does at least. I'll assume that you can understand why a pig isn't directly analogous to a human being and hence why your analogy isn't good.

What do you mean by "matter"? really? Is it important?

Morality is merely a set of rules that society has developed that go ...[text shortened]... ve another human being of a life then this is contrary to our society's growth and health.
It is ingrained AND THEREFORE all societies forbid murder and did even in our Natural State i.e. small, hunter gatherer bands.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
Actually, the bible does have a commandment against eating pigs. The old testament does at least. I'll assume that you can understand why a pig isn't directly analogous to a human being and hence why your analogy isn't good.

What do you mean by "matter"? really? Is it important?

Morality is merely a set of rules that society has developed that go ...[text shortened]... ve another human being of a life then this is contrary to our society's growth and health.
I don't think you ever answered the question why killing another human being is evil.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.