Go back
Blow to the Barr Cover-up

Blow to the Barr Cover-up

Debates

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
27 Oct 19

@wolfe63 said
"This obama judge will be overturned."

Oh great! So now, judges are mere reflections of the President what appointed them?
with obama appointments, yes

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
27 Oct 19

@mott-the-hoople said
with obama appointments, yes
Are you suggesting republican appointments aren’t?

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
27 Oct 19
1 edit

@shavixmir said
Are you suggesting republican appointments aren’t?
do you have an example? I can show you several obama appointed judges blocking Trump. Show me your example.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/federal-judge-who-blocked-trumps-border-wall-donated-20k-to-obama

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
27 Oct 19

@mott-the-hoople said
it doesnt matter...there is not any impeachment inquiry. This obama judge will be overturned.
So you think Federal judges are going to adopt the administration's position that the Watergate inquiry should never have gotten the Grand Jury testimony?

Somehow I doubt it. Nor is it likely any court is going to interfere in the sole impeachment power the Constitution gives to the House. These are non-serious arguments meant only to delay.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
27 Oct 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Trump should be impeached for stealing public money for the Wall when Congress explicitly refused to fund it.
I agree. If a president steals money, skip impeachment!!!, ....and send him straight to prison! I finally agree with
Marauder.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
27 Oct 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
So you think Federal judges are going to adopt the administration's position that the Watergate inquiry should never have gotten the Grand Jury testimony?

Somehow I doubt it. Nor is it likely any court is going to interfere in the sole impeachment power the Constitution gives to the House. These are non-serious arguments meant only to delay.
Watergate committees had subpoena power.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
28 Oct 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
Watergate committees had subpoena power.
So do Congressional committees now.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.