@mott-the-hoople saidAre you suggesting republican appointments aren’t?
with obama appointments, yes
@shavixmir saiddo you have an example? I can show you several obama appointed judges blocking Trump. Show me your example.
Are you suggesting republican appointments aren’t?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/federal-judge-who-blocked-trumps-border-wall-donated-20k-to-obama
27 Oct 19
@mott-the-hoople saidSo you think Federal judges are going to adopt the administration's position that the Watergate inquiry should never have gotten the Grand Jury testimony?
it doesnt matter...there is not any impeachment inquiry. This obama judge will be overturned.
Somehow I doubt it. Nor is it likely any court is going to interfere in the sole impeachment power the Constitution gives to the House. These are non-serious arguments meant only to delay.
@no1marauder saidI agree. If a president steals money, skip impeachment!!!, ....and send him straight to prison! I finally agree with
Trump should be impeached for stealing public money for the Wall when Congress explicitly refused to fund it.
Marauder.
@no1marauder saidWatergate committees had subpoena power.
So you think Federal judges are going to adopt the administration's position that the Watergate inquiry should never have gotten the Grand Jury testimony?
Somehow I doubt it. Nor is it likely any court is going to interfere in the sole impeachment power the Constitution gives to the House. These are non-serious arguments meant only to delay.
@mott-the-hoople saidSo do Congressional committees now.
Watergate committees had subpoena power.