CDC knew masks were ineffective

@shavixmir said
Folk don’t run away, they get bored explaining simple things to you.

I’ve told you and MB a hundred times: sneeze against a mirror. Then sneeze against a mirror with a face mask on.

The difference you see, is largely the difference in the spread of a virus.

Does the mask stop everything? Nope.
Does it stop some? Fukking obviously.

Everything you say is complet ...[text shortened]... oning agile health system).

Only one of the four is made up by me. Guess which one.

Dumb arse.

The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains is freelancing it on mask advice with his scientific experiment he composed himself.:

...sneeze against a mirror.

More harm than good shag doody.
What percentage of your breath is large droplets when breathing naturally through your nose?
What percentage of those droplets (=0) has wuflu on them?
Doesn't matter previous answer 0
The stupid rag was near zero efficacy when breathing normally, you will not find one of your so called experts recommending the mask for sneezing. Your breath blasts out at 150 kmh none of your stupid rags could contain a sneeze, this is the worst example of the ijit face rag working yet, and considering this has been going on years you've really reached the bottom. The ijit cloth has no chance of processing the 100kmh + air expelled in a sneeze, that is a physical fact.

In fact.

This is an excellent example of masks doing more harm than good, people like yourself thinking the ijit rag has majical powers and that you can go about sneezing on people because you've got a rag on your face.

You won the award: Worst Mask Advice Yet Award.

@wajoma said
The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains is freelancing it on mask advice with his scientific experiment he composed himself.:

...sneeze against a mirror.

More harm than good shag doody.
What percentage of your breath is large droplets when breathing naturally through your nose?
What percentage of those droplets (=0) has wuflu on them?
Doesn't matter previ ...[text shortened]... on people because you've got a rag on your face.

You won the award: Worst Mask Advice Yet Award.

Your information is wrong.

How you imagine there is 0 virus in a large droplet is beyond stupid. How you imagine that 0 spray is stopped by a face mask is equally stupid.

How you imagine that a face mask does more bad than good is a farce.

Breath normally against a mirror. See it steam up. Breath normally against a mirror with a mask on. Less steam. DUH.

And I’m not even in the pro-mask camp (as I find them a hinderance and only worthwhile in conjunction with other measures). But denying basic science is stupid.

And you are as stupid as they come.

@shavixmir said
Your information is wrong.

How you imagine there is 0 virus in a large droplet is beyond stupid. How you imagine that 0 spray is stopped by a face mask is equally stupid.

How you imagine that a face mask does more bad than good is a farce.

Breath normally against a mirror. See it steam up. Breath normally against a mirror with a mask on. Less steam. DUH.

And I’m ...[text shortened]... on with other measures). But denying basic science is stupid.

And you are as stupid as they come.

It stands, you've made a fool of yourself with your mask/sneeze example. It is such a great example of why no one should listen the The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for mask advice.

Not only is this an example of masks doing more harm than good, it's an example of how the pretend experts such as yourself actually undermine real advice.

Less steam? It's just gone out the sides you imbecile, that stupid rag cannot process the litres of air you breath. Yet another example of mask doing more harm than good, people sitting either side of you are getting blasted. There were loads of vids around showing this very real example. I liken this to the ijits that think solar panels will keep improving until they're producing more energy than they receive. People with not an idea of our physical world and the laws governing it.

I am prepared to concede there might be some wuflu present on large droplets, if you're prepared to concede large droplets comprise less than .001% of your breath.

You've beaten kev who bragged about wearing a one way mask, which allows exhale to pass freely through a non-return valve on the front of the mask.

@wajoma said
It stands, you've made a fool of yourself with your mask/sneeze example. It is such a great example of why no one should listen the The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for mask advice.

Not only is this an example of masks doing more harm than good, it's an example of how the pretend experts such as yourself actually undermine real advice.

Less steam? It's just gone out the ...[text shortened]... ne way mask, which allows exhale to pass freely through a non-return valve on the front of the mask.

You are as thick as a sack full of dried manure.

This is why nobody discusses anything with you. Because you think you are correct, when every professional on the planet tells you differently.

Every health organisation explains, in detail, what a mask does, what it doesn’t and how to use it properly in conjunction with other measures.

But, you obviously know better.
You don’t though. You think you do.
And I’ll leave you, referring to the first point of the summary of lessons learned I posted.

@shavixmir said
You are as thick as a sack full of dried manure.

This is why nobody discusses anything with you. Because you think you are correct, when every professional on the planet tells you differently.

Every health organisation explains, in detail, what a mask does, what it doesn’t and how to use it properly in conjunction with other measures.

But, you obviously know better ...[text shortened]... ou do.
And I’ll leave you, referring to the first point of the summary of lessons learned I posted.

Only certain mask, I saw so many people with bandannas for mask and everything else??

@shavixmir said
You are as thick as a sack full of dried manure.

This is why nobody discusses anything with you. Because you think you are correct, when every professional on the planet tells you differently.

Every health organisation explains, in detail, what a mask does, what it doesn’t and how to use it properly in conjunction with other measures.

But, you obviously know better ...[text shortened]... ou do.
And I’ll leave you, referring to the first point of the summary of lessons learned I posted.

You were proven wrong with the latest studies and you refuse to accept you were wrong by lying. Every health professional on the planet tells you nothing. You never talked to every health professional on the planet you lying sack of manure.

@mike69 said
Only certain mask, I saw so many people with bandannas for mask and everything else??

Well, I guess a bandana would have a certain effect, but not much.
Add to that, you should only wear a mask once, what do you do with the bandana afterwards?

@metal-brain said
You were proven wrong with the latest studies and you refuse to accept you were wrong by lying. Every health professional on the planet tells you nothing. You never talked to every health professional on the planet you lying sack of manure.

Uhuh.

I've quoted various studies for you over the years. I've pointed out the obvious to you, over the years. Nothing will ever get through to you.

You are, what we in the bizz call, a lost cause; Darwinism in action.

@divegeester said
Why do surgeons wear masks

I’ve tried explaining to these halfwits that st the very least masks are like having a permanent hankie on your face so your not actually directly sneezing and coughing in someone else’s face but they are not interested in common sense it’s all about the virus doing as much damage as possible.

@metal-brain said
You were proven wrong with the latest studies and you refuse to accept you were wrong by lying. Every health professional on the planet tells you nothing. You never talked to every health professional on the planet you lying sack of manure.

No he’s not but once again you’ve proven to be a vacuous dummy
The studies are not saying anything about the protective value of masks for the individual using them, they simply cannot find conclusive evidence that they stop the wider spread of the disease. How could they when half the population was too stupid or too misanthropic to wear them, your the reason masks were not as effective as they could have been

@shavixmir said
Uhuh.

I've quoted various studies for you over the years. I've pointed out the obvious to you, over the years. Nothing will ever get through to you.

You are, what we in the bizz call, a lost cause; Darwinism in action.

Outdated studies.

@kevcvs57 said
No he’s not but once again you’ve proven to be a vacuous dummy
The studies are not saying anything about the protective value of masks for the individual using them, they simply cannot find conclusive evidence that they stop the wider spread of the disease. How could they when half the population was too stupid or too misanthropic to wear them, your the reason masks were not as effective as they could have been

You are the dummy.
How can a mask work for the individual but not the population as a whole? You are being just as contradictory as Fauci. That is why he is a laughing stock now.

https://dailyreckoning.com/fauci-humiliated-on-tv/

@metal-brain said
You are the dummy.
How can a mask work for the individual but not the population as a whole? You are being just as contradictory as Fauci. That is why he is a laughing stock now.

https://dailyreckoning.com/fauci-humiliated-on-tv/

Are you really this moronic? Or just obnoxiously ignorant?

@metal-brain said
You are the dummy.
How can a mask work for the individual but not the population as a whole? You are being just as contradictory as Fauci. That is why he is a laughing stock now.

https://dailyreckoning.com/fauci-humiliated-on-tv/

The same way that a seat belt protects the individual wearing it but not the idiot that doesn’t wear one you freaking numbskull
How can you judge the effectiveness of masks as an anti pandemic measure when at least half the population are not wearing them you clown brain

@shavixmir said
Uhuh.

I've quoted various studies for you over the years. I've pointed out the obvious to you, over the years. Nothing will ever get through to you.

You are, what we in the bizz call, a lost cause; Darwinism in action.

I missed the one where every health official said your ijit rag could contain a sneeze. But nice point, if you don't sneeze you don't need the ijit rag on your face.