11 Sep 23
@kevcvs57 saidYou can look at stats that show after mask mandates were introduced bogeyman flu cases went up.
The same way that a seat belt protects the individual wearing it but not the idiot that doesn’t wear one you freaking numbskull
How can you judge the effectiveness of masks as an anti pandemic measure when at least half the population are not wearing them you clown brain
@wajoma saidNice so 2 + 2 can make 5 good to know
You can look at stats that show after mask mandates were introduced bogeyman flu cases went up.
Any evidence that it was the masks that accelerated the rate of infection or perhaps given the woeful adherence to the mandates, in large parts thanks to people like you, the pandemic just did it’s natural unrestrained thang
11 Sep 23
@kevcvs57 saidThe surgeons mask is to stop large droplets, it is not an excuse for the surgeon to cough and sneeze into open wounds. It is not an excuse for the surgeon to operate on patients when he is wuflu positive, it is not an excuse for him to come to work with wuflu and infect everyone in theater. This is as idiotic as the Pseud Known as Shag Doody's sneeze on a mirror example.
I’ve tried explaining to these halfwits that st the very least masks are like having a permanent hankie on your face so your not actually directly sneezing and coughing in someone else’s face but they are not interested in common sense it’s all about the virus doing as much damage as possible.
More harm than good.
11 Sep 23
@wajoma saidI think you might be ineffectually countering someone else’s common sense argument 🤔
The surgeons mask is to stop large droplets, it is not an excuse for the surgeon to cough and sneeze into open wounds. It is not an excuse for the surgeon to operate on patients when he is wuflu positive, it is not an excuse for him to come to work with wuflu and infect everyone in theater. This is as idiotic as the Pseud Known as Shag Doody's sneeze on a mirror example.
More harm than good.
11 Sep 23
@wajoma saidRetard.
The surgeons mask is to stop large droplets, it is not an excuse for the surgeon to cough and sneeze into open wounds. It is not an excuse for the surgeon to operate on patients when he is wuflu positive, it is not an excuse for him to come to work with wuflu and infect everyone in theater. This is as idiotic as the Pseud Known as Shag Doody's sneeze on a mirror example.
More harm than good.
@Metal-Brain if masks are ineffective, why do surgeons wear them? They are effective IF people wear them properly.
@phranny saidIn the cases of wajoma and mb wearing them at all might have helped
@Metal-Brain if masks are ineffective, why do surgeons wear them? They are effective IF people wear them properly.
@wajoma saidYou do know that the covid virus was suspended in those very droplets that the masks catch a massively high % of if the correct mask is worn correctly. As far as I know covid is not a truly airborne disease and even if it was masks would still do a lot more good than harm you misanthrope
The surgeons mask is not to stop viruses. When breathing normally through your nose how much of your breath is large droplets?
@kevcvs57 saidHaha kaka bamboozle is playing with percentages, 100% of bogeyman flu = 100% and 100% is a big number.
You do know that the covid virus was suspended in those very droplets that the masks catch a massively high % of if the correct mask is worn correctly. As far as I know covid is not a truly airborne disease and even if it was masks would still do a lot more good than harm you misanthrope
What percentage of a large droplet is the bogeyman flu?
What percentage of your breath is large droplets? and we've now got a number so small it can hardly be measured.
kev I can't believe you're even commenting here when you've expressed a desire to infect innocent people. You're the misanthrope. I don't wish the bogeyman flu on anyone, it can be serious.
12 Sep 23
@phranny saidSo they don't accidentally spit into an opened up patient during surgery.
@Metal-Brain if masks are ineffective, why do surgeons wear them? They are effective IF people wear them properly.
Documents recently obtained from the National Institutes of Health suggest public health officials used inaccurate information and misrepresented medical research to advance their policy objective that masks prevent severe COVID-19 and virus transmission—despite opposing scientific evidence received from experts.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/secret-letter-cdc-top-epidemiologist-suggests-agency-misrepresented-scientific-data
The CDC lied.
12 Sep 23
@metal-brain said🥱
So they don't accidentally spit into an opened up patient during surgery.
Documents recently obtained from the National Institutes of Health suggest public health officials used inaccurate information and misrepresented medical research to advance their policy objective that masks prevent severe COVID-19 and virus transmission—despite opposing scientific evidence recei ...[text shortened]... secret-letter-cdc-top-epidemiologist-suggests-agency-misrepresented-scientific-data
The CDC lied.
@shavixmir
Documents recently obtained from the National Institutes of Health suggest public health officials used inaccurate information and misrepresented medical research to advance their policy objective that masks prevent severe COVID-19 and virus transmission—despite opposing scientific evidence received from experts.
Your heroes were lying to you moron.
12 Sep 23
@kevcvs57 saidFrom the link below:
Nice so 2 + 2 can make 5 good to know
Any evidence that it was the masks that accelerated the rate of infection or perhaps given the woeful adherence to the mandates, in large parts thanks to people like you, the pandemic just did it’s natural unrestrained thang
"top epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, and seven colleagues informed the agency it was promoting flawed data and excluding data that did not reinforce their narrative.
The letter warned the agency that misrepresenting data on trusted websites such as the CDC and the COVID-19 Real-Time Learning Network—jointly created by the CDC and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)—would “damage the credibility of science,” endanger public trust by “misrepresenting the evidence,” and give the public “false expectations” masking would protect them from the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.
“We believe the information and recommendations as provided may actually put an individual at increased risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and for them to experience a serious or even life-threatening infection,” Mr. Osterhom wrote.
The authors urged the IDSA to remove the suggestion that masking prevents severe disease from its website and asked the CDC to reconsider its statements about the “efficacy of masks and face coverings for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”
Osterholm also noted a pattern of selectively choosing data that supported the desired narrative that masks prevent severe COVID-19 disease and transmission—claims he said are unsupported by the scientific evidence provided by the CDC and IDSA on their websites.
The IDSA “Masks and Face Coverings for the Public” webpage appears to “focus on the strengths of studies that support its conclusions while ignoring their shortcomings of study design,” Mr. Osterholm wrote. “Studies that do not support its perspective are similarly downplayed.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/secret-letter-cdc-top-epidemiologist-suggests-agency-misrepresented-scientific-data
There was never any evidence masks helped. Masks are to scare people into getting vaccinated with the gene vaccines. They serve to make big pharma wealthier by coercing people into taking their vaccines that use gene therapy technology.
All of the government health officials told us masks do more harm than good from the beginning. They told the truth the first time. Then they figured out mandating masks made people want to get jabbed. That is why they lied.
12 Sep 23
@metal-brain saidUhuh.
@shavixmir
Documents recently obtained from the National Institutes of Health suggest public health officials used inaccurate information and misrepresented medical research to advance their policy objective that masks prevent severe COVID-19 and virus transmission—despite opposing scientific evidence received from experts.
Your heroes were lying to you moron.
Every health institute in the world is lying, using inaccurate information and misrepresenting medical research... uhuh...
None of them, by the way, suggested that wearing masks prevented severe COVID-19... just sayin'.
But why you believe your right-wing moronity, above EVERY FUKKING HEALTH AUTHORITY IN THE WORLD beggers belief.
Retard.