Go back
China: We're not interested in curbing our emissions

China: We're not interested in curbing our emissions

Debates

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlFHlfH4ch0M4bTr15oijjInyyPgD9C6OO580

China will seek binding pollution targets for developed countries and reject similar requirements for itself at an international climate summit next month, China's top climate envoy said Wednesday.

I understand that China's per capita emissions are still lower t ...[text shortened]... r Copenhagen will be as worthless as Kyoto.

And that, my friends, is saying something.
The world cannot expect China to be the world's manufacturing base AND cut emissions at the same time.

We are being ridiculous.

We're the ones cutting back factory jobs so WE shoudl be the ones doing the emissions cutting.

We're a bunch of hypocrites.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89792
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I thought we were supposed to be discouraging overpopulation in today's environmentally conscious World, not rewarding it!?
When China had their 1-baby law going, everyone was screaming how bad it was (in fact, I don't know if they actually stopped it or not, to be quite honest). But at least they tried to discourage population growth.

Personally, I'm all for global warming. The fast this ship sinks into a burning ball of fire and we all die screaming like pigs, the happier I'll be.

I also do kid's shows.

TS

Joined
24 Aug 07
Moves
15849
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
When China had their 1-baby law going, everyone was screaming how bad it was (in fact, I don't know if they actually stopped it or not, to be quite honest). But at least they tried to discourage population growth.

Personally, I'm all for global warming. The fast this ship sinks into a burning ball of fire and we all die screaming like pigs, the happier I'll be.

I also do kid's shows.
I totally agree.
The sooner humans become extinct the better for every other species on the planet and for the planet as a whole.
Maybe climate change is just Mother Earth's defense mechanism kicking in.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Snapper
I totally agree.
The sooner humans become extinct the better for every other species on the planet and for the planet as a whole.
Maybe climate change is just Mother Earth's defense mechanism kicking in.
What do you reckon "the planet" wants?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89792
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
What do you reckon "the planet" wants?
I would presume a painful end to conservatives, capitalists and vegetarians.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

who trusts china to MEASURE their emissions?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89792
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
who trusts china to MEASURE their emissions?
Who trusts the US in anything they say or do?

TS

Joined
24 Aug 07
Moves
15849
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
What do you reckon "the planet" wants?
I'm not sure but maybe not to be f*@ked up by a miserable little species like us.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Snapper
I'm not sure but maybe not to be f*@ked up by a miserable little species like us.
Maybe the planet really likes nuclear waste. What do you know about the preferences of a lump of rock?

TS

Joined
24 Aug 07
Moves
15849
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Maybe the planet really likes nuclear waste. What do you know about the preferences of a lump of rock?
You are correct, I know nothing about the preferences of a lump of rock.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
26 Nov 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
China will seek binding pollution targets for developed countries and reject similar requirements for itself at an international climate summit next month, China's top climate envoy said Wednesday.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8380106.stm
China has unveiled its first firm target for limiting greenhouse gas emissions, two weeks before a global summit on climate change in Copenhagen.

Beijing said it would aim to reduce its "carbon intensity" by 40-45% by the year 2020, compared with 2005 levels.


Now what? They choose binding pollution targets, but weigh them by GDP which means China's emissions will still probably grow. At least it's something.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Kyoto_Protocol_participation_map_2009.png

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Kyoto_Protocol_participation_map_2009.png
Interesting. Zimbabwe, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq and the US.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
Interesting. Zimbabwe, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq and the US.
Don't forget the major carbon emitter, Vatican City.

D
incipit parodia

Joined
01 Aug 07
Moves
46580
Clock
26 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Don't forget the major carbon emitter, Vatican City.
Only during Conclave. All that white smoke...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.