@suzianne saidwhen they tell you they were lying to you and you continue on, it is nothing short of lunacy.
@Mott-The-Hoople
You misspelled Republican.
@Mott-The-Hoople
When YOU keep up with the anti American propaganda dished out by your Russian handlers it just goes to show just how much you hate the US.
@sonhouse saidOdd...you are the one that's always whining about how bad the USA is and how much you hate it.
@Mott-The-Hoople
When YOU keep up with the anti American propaganda dished out by your Russian handlers it just goes to show just how much you hate the US.
@Dood111
Ok, find me a sonhouse post where I said I hate the US.
You need to take your meds.
Which, BTW is just another distraction from your obvious hatred of the US.
I bet you didn't even spend any time in any US military, maybe your daddy got you off with a bone spur just like your god king Trump.
@sonhouse saidAnybody who exposes the brutal truth about our country is falsely called a hater of their own country. Does trying to improve our country by exposing our corrupt government make me guilty of hating my own country?
@Dood111
Ok, find me a sonhouse post where I said I hate the US.
You need to take your meds.
Which, BTW is just another distraction from your obvious hatred of the US.
I bet you didn't even spend any time in any US military, maybe your daddy got you off with a bone spur just like your god king Trump.
When you exposed Trump for his corruption did that prove you hated your country? You did it because you love your country enough to want to improve it. I am doing the same thing by exposing Biden's corruption.
And Russian collusion was fake.
The investigation started from a rumor. No evidence. You said evidence was needed for election fraud claims to be legitimate, yet you needed no evidence when you made your election meddling claim. HRC called Trump an illegitimate POTUS without evidence and you lapped it up.
Look up "Crossfire Hurricane". Show me the evidence.
@Metal-Brain
And you are a pig headed BS artist because they DID attack just as laid out in the Muller report, did you read that or just poo poo it without even looking at it?
I have a copy, I can lend it to you if you wish, then go over point by point the claims made by our intel folks.
Anyone who says otherwise is directly or inadvertently working for PUTIN.
You are NOT helping the USA by your scree about fake Russian attacks.
Who you help: Try that dude we talked about before, PUTIN.
@sonhouse saidThe investigation was started because George Demetrios Papadopoulos repeated a rumor he heard.
@Metal-Brain
And you are a pig headed BS artist because they DID attack just as laid out in the Muller report, did you read that or just poo poo it without even looking at it?
I have a copy, I can lend it to you if you wish, then go over point by point the claims made by our intel folks.
Anyone who says otherwise is directly or inadvertently working for PUTIN.
You ar ...[text shortened]... our scree about fake Russian attacks.
Who you help: Try that dude we talked about before, PUTIN.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossfire_Hurricane_(FBI_investigation)
The investigation was not started with any evidence. Rumors are not evidence.
If you carefully read the Mueller report you will notice there is no evidence Trump colluded with Russia.
There is no evidence of an attack by Russia. Crowdstrike admitted under oath they had no evidence Russia hacked the DNC which has been proven to you countless times and you keep repeating the lie.
@metal-brain saidWhat have the Stones got to do with it?
Look up "Crossfire Hurricane". Show me the evidence.
Quote
" I was born in a cross-fire hurricane
And I howled at my ma in the driving rain
But it's all right now, in fact, it's a gas
But it's all right. I'm Jumpin' Jack Flash
It's a gas! Gas! Gas"
End quote
@Metal-Brain
Like I said, you keep spouting the PUTIN propaganda lines REALLY well. Putin will be PROUD, BOY.
This IS from Crowdstrike:
"Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.
Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.
To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”
This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
The Senate report states on page 48:
“The Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.”
But OF COURSE that won't stop you from telling yet another of the big repub/Putin lies.
@metal-brain saidSpecial counsel Robert Mueller's investigation netted 199 criminal charges, 37 indictments or guilty pleas, and 5 prison sentences. Charges included conspiracy, perjury, money laundering, bank fraud, hacking, "willfully and knowingly making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations", "identity fraud for selling bank account numbers to Russians involved in election interference", campaign finance violation etc.
The investigation was started because George Demetrios Papadopoulos repeated a rumor he heard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossfire_Hurricane_(FBI_investigation)
The investigation was not started with any evidence. Rumors are not evidence.
If you carefully read the Mueller report you will notice there is no evidence Trump colluded with Russia.
There is no ev ...[text shortened]... e Russia hacked the DNC which has been proven to you countless times and you keep repeating the lie.
There was a there there.
@sonhouse saidHere is an excerpt from the link below:
@Metal-Brain
Like I said, you keep spouting the PUTIN propaganda lines REALLY well. Putin will be PROUD, BOY.
This IS from Crowdstrike:
"Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.
Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed ...[text shortened]... ampaign.”
But OF COURSE that won't stop you from telling yet another of the big repub/Putin lies.
"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server."
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/05/13/crowdstrike_president_under_oath_no_proof_of_russia_dnc_hack_510974.html#!
Crowdstrike mislead people into believing they had proof and later admitted they didn't. I have proven this to you countless times and you refuse to accept this fact. Crowdstrike was not honest about it at first, but under oath they didn't want to commit perjury and told the truth.
Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.
@wildgrass saidNone of it had anything to do with Russian collusion.
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation netted 199 criminal charges, 37 indictments or guilty pleas, and 5 prison sentences. Charges included conspiracy, perjury, money laundering, bank fraud, hacking, "willfully and knowingly making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations", "identity fraud for selling bank account numbers to Russians involved in election interference", campaign finance violation etc.
There was a there there.
What was so nefarious about what George Papadopoulos did?
Didn't he not remember dates correctly and get accused of lying? I don't remember dates well either. If that would result in a perjury charge I would be doomed. Since when is not remembering exact dates of meetings a big crime?
Do you think George Papadopoulos deserved 12 days in prison for it?