Go back
CNN admits Russian collusion was Fake

CNN admits Russian collusion was Fake

Debates

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
29 Nov 21

@metal-brain said
Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic Natio ...[text shortened]... it perjury and told the truth.

Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.
Crowdstrike has been a good investment, They Dizoomed into a perfect niche.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
29 Nov 21

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
SCREW COLLUSION, I am talking about RUSSIA ATTACKING THE DNC.
STOP LIVING IN DENIAL!

Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/05/13/crowdstrike_president_under_oath_no_proof_of_russia_dnc_hack_510974.html#!

Crowdstrike mislead people into believing they had proof and later admitted they didn't. I have proven this to you countless times and you refuse to accept this fact. Crowdstrike was not honest about it at first, but under oath they didn't want to commit perjury and told the truth.

Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
29 Nov 21

@metal-brain said
STOP LIVING IN DENIAL!

Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails ...[text shortened]... mit perjury and told the truth.

Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.
sonhouse is a direct result of being led by the state run media. he knows nothing else

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
29 Nov 21

@Mott-The-Hoople
You keep spouting the Putin line.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9629
Clock
29 Nov 21

@metal-brain said
None of it had anything to do with Russian collusion.

What was so nefarious about what George Papadopoulos did?
Didn't he not remember dates correctly and get accused of lying? I don't remember dates well either. If that would result in a perjury charge I would be doomed. Since when is not remembering exact dates of meetings a big crime?

Do you think George Papadopoulos deserved 12 days in prison for it?
We live in a society with laws. Lots of the people directly around Trump during the campaign broke the law. They lied. The definition of perjury goes beyond "I can't remember that date." I'm not a judge so I'm not going to interpret whether what lawyers based the charges on are worthy of punishment. But they were punished.

Over 100 criminal charges. There was a there there.

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
29 Nov 21

@wildgrass said
We live in a society with laws. Lots of the people directly around Trump during the campaign broke the law. They lied. The definition of perjury goes beyond "I can't remember that date." I'm not a judge so I'm not going to interpret whether what lawyers based the charges on are worthy of punishment. But they were punished.

Over 100 criminal charges. There was a there there.
which one involved anything related to Trump?

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147688
Clock
29 Nov 21

@sonhouse said
@Mott-The-Hoople
You keep spouting the Putin line.
are you seeing things that arent there? C&P where I mentioned russia

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9629
Clock
29 Nov 21
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
which one involved anything related to Trump?
The connection is that the people charged and imprisoned were working for him as high-level officials on his campaign when the crimes were committed.

I don't know that Trump was involved. But there was a there there. This is not fake news.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Nov 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
STOP LIVING IN DENIAL!

Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails ...[text shortened]... mit perjury and told the truth.

Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.
This is a falsehood you have regurgitated on this board countless times.

Crowdstrike specifically addressed these false claims last year: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

"Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network."

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
30 Nov 21

@wildgrass said
We live in a society with laws. Lots of the people directly around Trump during the campaign broke the law. They lied. The definition of perjury goes beyond "I can't remember that date." I'm not a judge so I'm not going to interpret whether what lawyers based the charges on are worthy of punishment. But they were punished.

Over 100 criminal charges. There was a there there.
Perjury is not necessarily an indication of wrongdoing because memory is not perfect. Just because someone makes a statement that is not true does not mean it is intentional.

Once again. What did George P. do that was nefarious? If you cannot answer that question you have nothing. So far you have refused to answer that question.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
30 Nov 21

@no1marauder said
This is a falsehood you have regurgitated on this board countless times.

Crowdstrike specifically addressed these false claims last year: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

"Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent C ...[text shortened]... in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network."
STOP LIVING IN DENIAL!

Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/05/13/crowdstrike_president_under_oath_no_proof_of_russia_dnc_hack_510974.html#!

Crowdstrike mislead people into believing they had proof and later admitted they didn't. I have proven this to you countless times and you refuse to accept this fact. Crowdstrike was not honest about it at first, but under oath they didn't want to commit perjury and told the truth.

Mueller never had any proof and he knew it. Now you know he lied.
Crowdstrike specifically said they had no evidence under oath.

NOW YOU ARE LYING! STOP CALLING FACTS FALSEHOODS!
YOU KNOW BETTER!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
30 Nov 21

@Metal-Brain
Yep, just keep on pukin the Putin lines. I never said Trump colluded or whatever, we are talking about the RUSSIANS attacking DNC which they did and you keep PROVING your hatred of the US when you keep spouting the Putin lies.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
30 Nov 21

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Yep, just keep on pukin the Putin lines. I never said Trump colluded or whatever, we are talking about the RUSSIANS attacking DNC which they did and you keep PROVING your hatred of the US when you keep spouting the Putin lies.
You are the one who hates and you are merely projecting it on me and that is your manufactured falsehood for preferred belief. You do that all of the time. Whenever you hate you accuse those you hate of hate.

You have what I call "I hate you so you are always wrong syndrome". IHYSYAAW syndrome is when people cannot accept a person they hate could ever be right about anything. The problem with that is even the most selfish jerk in the world cannot be wrong all of the time, it is impossible.

Your partisan bias is hate driven. That is why your IHYSYAAW Syndrome is so bad you believe the impossible. You even reject science because of your IHYSYAAW Syndrome. Just take my thread on the science forum about electricity. You will not even admit that Tesla winning the current war was important enough to admit Tesla questioning the scientific knowledge of Edison was a good thing.

I think you hate anybody who questions anything you believe. For that reason you will never believe anything else. If you can never be convinced anything you believe is wrong you are living in your own dark ages.

This thread is about Russian collusion. Russian collusion was fake and you do not dispute that, right?

Crowdstrike admitted under oath they had no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. That is a fact. Do you dispute that fact?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
30 Nov 21

@metal-brain said
STOP LIVING IN DENIAL!

Here is an excerpt from the link below:

"CrowdStrike, the cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, privately acknowledged more than two years ago that it had no evidence that Russian hackers stole emails ...[text shortened]... had no evidence under oath.

NOW YOU ARE LYING! STOP CALLING FACTS FALSEHOODS!
YOU KNOW BETTER!
Repeating over and over a falsehood from an article does not make it true.

Crowdstrike never said it had "no evidence" as you well know.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
30 Nov 21

@no1marauder
I think he is a paid Russian operative so there is no way he would EVER admit the Russians attacked the DNC, he keeps going SEE, NO COLLUSION, which is not quite the same thing as an attack on DNC by Russian agents.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.