CNN admits Russian collusion was Fake

@metal-brain said
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. That means it is NOT iron clad evidence. This is how I know you are not a lawyer. You can lie all you want, but if I create an entire thread called "circumstantial evidence" and I call on sh76 (a real lawyer) to weigh in he will tell you exactly what I said and back it up with actual law.

You are on a weak branch and you ou ...[text shortened]... to admit it yet.

sh76, what is your expert opinion? Can you believe this bluffing from no1 idiot?

@sh76 said
Circumstantial evidence is real evidence. The opposite of circumstantial is "direct" evidence. Sometimes (often?), it's stronger than "direct" evidence.

The evidence in the OJ Simpson case (except for the confession to Rosey Grier, which was not admissible due to Clergy-Penitent privilege) was all circumstantial, but very strong. Direct evidence is something like an eyewitnes ...[text shortened]... People can be (and often are) sent to prison for life or death row based on circumstantial evidence.

@wildgrass said
Perjury has a very clear definition in the law. It is not "not remembering dates." The 5th amendment exists for a good reason.

Is this the first time you're learning about double standards? Do you believe that the existence of a double standard makes something fake. That's absurd.

A double standard does not make something fake. You are comparing a single individual wh ...[text shortened]... onnected to the Trump campaign were all indicted or plead guilty to criminal activity. Its not fake.

@metal-brain said
Clinesmith altered an email from the CIA to the GCO, in which Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was described as a source for the agency, to say he was not a source – which cleared the way for the FBI to request a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Page as a “Russian agent” and, through him, the Trump campaign.

A crime was committed there too ...[text shortened]... ns of power. They get away with murder and you are condoning it because of your silly partisan bias.

@wildgrass said
The law is unequal. It is not fake.

@metal-brain said
Like I said before, justice is fake.

@wildgrass
I think MH is a Russian asset so he can NEVER admit Russians attacked the DNC.

He spends WAY too much time repeating the Putin/Trump lies that Russia had nothing to do with it, instead, trying to blame the UKRAINE or CHINA, or IRAN, ANYONE but the actual hackers.

BTW, he NEVER denies my charge, just goes, 'you are paranoid'

He ALWAYS has a hidden agenda and he would DIE first before revealing ANY of that.

@wildgrass said
Nope. This actually happened. Laws were broken. Not fake.

@metal-brain said
"People can be (and often are) sent to prison for life or death row based on circumstantial evidence"

That is irrelevant. We all know a jury considers circumstantial evidence and wrong convictions often result from that circumstantial evidence.

"Sometimes (often?), it's stronger than "direct" evidence."

That is hard for me to believe. Example?

edit:

Here i ...[text shortened]... part of "no evidence" do you not understand?
Have you embraced the Russiagate conspiracy theory sh?

@sh76 said
===That is hard for me to believe. Example?===

Ballistics matching the defendant's gun to the slug in the victim or matching the blood or semen at a crime scene to the defendant is extremely strong (circumstantial) evidence - often stronger than eyewitness reports, which are often unreliable.

I am not going into the Russia-Trump thing. I've had enough of it. If you want my ...[text shortened]... mp-Russia collusion, I can only summarize it by saying there is a lot of smoke but very little fire.

@Metal-Brain
Right, ONLY if the witness was DEMOCRAT, if he or she was repub, whatever they said is TOTALLY true.

@metal-brain said
Clinesmith broke the law too.
Why didn't he spend any time behind bars?

@wildgrass said
I don't know, I'm not a lawyer.

For every one person who gets away with a crime, does that make crime fake news?

@metal-brain said
You don't have to be a lawyer to find out. I found out once. The judge gave him the benefit of the doubt and said he believed he didn't intentionally break the law even though he did.

The judge was corrupt. It happens more often than you think. You just condone it when it suits your political bias and condemn it when it doesn't. I'll bet you would scrutinize Trump's p ...[text shortened]... ing about the words I used and this isn't the first time. Stop using straw man arguments to mislead.

@wildgrass said
The title of this thread is Russia collusion was fake. You agreed with that, and now you are denying it. It was not fake. People from multiple continents went to prison. The people in the US who went to prison were top officials in the Trump campaign, who committed the crimes during the campaign.

You can argue that the charges were politically one-sided, but I went throu ...[text shortened]... too. If a judge reviews the evidence and find them guilty and charges them, then they are criminals.