CNN Poll: 73% of Democrats Want Someone Other Than Kamala Harris as Nominee

@Mott-The-Hoople said
I c&p'ed the title straight from the article dunmbass, I didnt type it... read the EDITORS note over and over till you understand it

CNN Poll: 76% of Democrats & Democrat-Leaning Voters Want Party to Nominate Kamala Harris

That is the title at Breitbartt.

and that:

Editor’s Note: This story misread poll results to claim that 73% of registered Democrats wanted someone other than Kamala Harris as the party’s presidential nominee. In reality, only 23% of Democrat and Democrat-leaning respondents said they wanted a different candidate. That 73% figure was merely the proportion of people within that 23% of dissenters who did not prefer a particular candidate instead of her. The headline and text have been updated to correct this misreading.

Is the editors note.

You presented yourself as someone who is in the know. And instead af telling "You are right, the ditirs got and corrected it and the thread title is misleading" you do what?

You have some nerve to call anyone "dumbass"

@Mott-The-Hoople said
no hun…it wasn’t there when I posted …damn you people are dumb🙄

According to you, it is right there in the article you linked to.

@no1marauder said
Jesus, you imbeciles can't read:

"“About three-quarters of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters (76😵 say the Democratic Party should nominate Harris as its candidate for president, with only about 6% expressing support for any other specific person as the nominee,” CNN revealed.

[b]When the 23% who did not prefer Harris were asked which specific candidate they ...[text shortened]... besides Kamala Harris: 73 percent."


Don't you feel like even more of a bigger idiot than usual?

"the Democratic Party should nominate Harris"

Technically that does not mean they want her. "Should" could mean they have resigned to the fact they cannot have who they want without being hypocrites, so they have settled for prison slavery Kamala.

@Suzianne said
According to you, it is right there in the article you linked to.

no dumbass , a correction isn’t in the original article 😂

@Ponderable said
CNN Poll: 76% of Democrats & Democrat-Leaning Voters Want Party to Nominate Kamala Harris

That is the title at Breitbartt.

and that: [quote]Editor’s Note: This story misread poll results to claim that 73% of registered Democrats wanted someone other than Kamala Harris as the party’s presidential nominee. In reality, only 23% of Democrat and Democrat-leaning responden ...[text shortened]... it and the thread title is misleading" you do what?

You have some nerve to call anyone "dumbass"

do you people understand what “correction” means. queer clique is looking like fools

@Mott-The-Hoople said
why did you intentionally leave this out? you just cant be honest can you?

"Editor’s Note: This story misread poll results to claim that 73% of registered Democrats wanted someone other than Kamala Harris as the party’s presidential nominee. In reality, only 23% of Democrat and Democrat-leaning respondents said they wanted a different candidate. That 73% figure was ...[text shortened]... cular candidate instead of her. The headline and text have been updated to correct this misreading."

ah, but you didn't put that disclaimer. you started a thread with that clickbait misleading title and hoped nobody would click on a breitbart article and those that do, wouldn't catch it.


I am giving you too much credit though. Before Marauder caught you with your pants down you just read the title. Now everyone is laughing at your little peepee and you are hoping this disclaimer that the breitbart "journalists" had to add so they don't get sued (but ofc left the article online) would be enough to justify your lack of reading skills

It isn't

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂 you sure act up when you get caught being deceitful.

read that editors note till you understand it fboy

hehe it's like arguing with a 3 year old that only has "no u" as a counter argument

Usually that's very frustrating to debate against but if you remind yourself the other party is a 3 year old (or an imbecile) the frustration should go away

@Zahlanzi said
hehe it's like arguing with a 3 year old that only has "no u" as a counter argument

Usually that's very frustrating to debate against but if you remind yourself the other party is a 3 year old (or an imbecile) the frustration should go away

queer clique in full force 😂

@Mott-The-Hoople said
queer clique in full force 😂

It always comes back around to sex with you mott.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
its sad the way you in the queer clique have to run to the rescue 😂

It’s strange how one can be so stuck in a closet, they can only squeal like they’re opposed to homosexuality.

I bet you have a tiny cock. That must be it.

@shavixmir said
It’s strange how one can be so stuck in a closet, they can only squeal like they’re opposed to homosexuality.

I bet you have a tiny cock. That must be it.

the queer trying reverse psychology in desperation

LMFAO

@Mott-The-Hoople said
the queer trying reverse psychology in desperation

LMFAO

Dude, I’ve laid more women than your mum has laid men.

Well, okay. That’s obviously not true. Your mum is a legend.

@shavixmir said
Dude, I’ve laid more women than your mum has laid men.

Well, okay. That’s obviously not true. Your mum is a legend.

serial rapists are frowned upon in my neck of the woods

@Mott-The-Hoople said
serial rapists are frowned upon in my neck of the woods

Is that why you don’t have any friends?

What am I thinking of! As if you’ve ever actually touched a women! Haha. The only sexual thing you’ve ever groped is your own pubes as you search for your tiny sausage.