Go back
Could all S Americans come here.

Could all S Americans come here.

Debates

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55110
Clock
10 May 23
1 edit

@sergeantpmain said
@AverageJoe1
The World is in decay. Why would someone want to flood the western world with 3rd world trash, unless they were communist? Diversity never works, Never has. any educated person would know that. People will eventually get sick of it, and revolution will take place. It's just a matter of time. Western civilization has always found a way, and always will.
Right. And why would Canada open a border to the corruption of the Biden family and what they espouse? Everyone needs to go watch today’s hearings on that family.
Latest lie, reporter asked Biden if any money went to family members. He said no. I wish the libs here would treat him like they treated Trump. He is worse than Trump. With Hunter, cunning and conniving, and all of the bad things that go with being such a horrible person.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55110
Clock
10 May 23

@rajk999 said
I never said anything about 10,000 yrs. I am not a liberal. I dont even know what that means. Never did I say to start with the dissolution of the southern border. Never said I am unhappy with my lifestyle, and I have far more than the average person in the USA... I do not envy anything in the USA. I am retired and live in a tropical island in a fair amount of luxury, whe ...[text shortened]... work, as it is right now in most parts of the world. Why do you keep asking that childish question
On page 2 you referred to the initial impact! So it would be an impact? Please tell me in what way?
Today 10000 arrived, they cost $8m a day, is that your impact? Is the surge that begins tomorrow your impact?
Our country is doing OK going on 230 years, what is it that you think we need from these people?
So many unanswered questions from liberals.
Here is another. Pelosi whines about the homeless, but her 14 bedrooms in San Francisco remain empty. You yourself seem to be doing fine, why don’t you and Suzianne give your stuff to the poor people?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55110
Clock
10 May 23

@AverageJoe1
And, why don’t rich people who agree that they should pay more taxes…
Why don’t these people send more money than they actually owe to the tax office on April 15?
And why don’t liberals answer these questions? Do you want to be shamed by AvJoe who always answers a question?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
90166
Clock
11 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
@AverageJoe1
And, why don’t rich people who agree that they should pay more taxes…
Why don’t these people send more money than they actually owe to the tax office on April 15?
And why don’t liberals answer these questions? Do you want to be shamed by AvJoe who always answers a question?
Your questions are always answered.
It can’t be helped you’re too fukking retarded to comprehend the answers.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
11 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
Logic: If 100 people live on a 200 acre area, independent of everyone else in the world, (like an unknown, undiscovered tribe on the Amazon) and these people all have the same assets, and do the same things all the time, and you had to say that they are Rich, or that they are in poverty, you could say either, and objectively, you would be correct.
No you couldn’t use those terms because both are relative, if everyone has the same and they only had knowledge of themselves they would not be able to make a judgement, they likely would not have words in their language to describe those relative conditions.
You would need an outside arbiter to decide if they are relatively rich or poor in relation to a society outwith their own 🙄

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55110
Clock
11 May 23

@kevcvs57 said
No you couldn’t use those terms because both are relative, if everyone has the same and they only had knowledge of themselves they would not be able to make a judgement, they likely would not have words in their language to describe those relative conditions.
You would need an outside arbiter to decide if they are relatively rich or poor in relation to a society outwith their own 🙄
My premise recites “independent of everyone else in the world” …..which totally negates your post.
An outside arbiter? That alone shows that don’t get the post. For purposes of this analogy, there is no society outside of their own.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
11 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
My premise recites “independent of everyone else in the world” …..which totally negates your post.
An outside arbiter? That alone shows that don’t get the post. For purposes of this analogy, there is no society outside of their own.
No you idiot it supports my post entirely
If they have no knowledge of any society or group of people that have more or less than them they would not have the concept of poverty or wealth you freaking halfwit.
Poor and Rich are relative concepts you utter retard.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55110
Clock
11 May 23

@kevcvs57 said
No you idiot it supports my post entirely
If they have no knowledge of any society or group of people that have more or less than them they would not have the concept of poverty or wealth you freaking halfwit.
Poor and Rich are relative concepts you utter retard.
This will clarify. These tribesmen are living in a private world. We observe them from a drone 200 feet up. You might say these people are poor. I might say I think that they are rich they have all that they need.
Of course, they do not know if they are rich or poor. That is my point. Liberals always want to drag extraneous factoids into an issue.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.