Go back
Could have been shrapnel, not bullet

Could have been shrapnel, not bullet

Debates

Clock

Clock

-Removed-
ummm…there is a picture of the bullet

you fools fall for anything

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid

Clock

What difference does it make?

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople said
ummm…there is a picture of the bullet

you fools fall for anything

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
Uh… yeah… sure.
So, they can determine how close that bullet was to trump’s ear then, I presume?

Clock

@shavixmir said
Uh… yeah… sure.
So, they can determine how close that bullet was to trump’s ear then, I presume?
I can only show you

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople said
I can only show you
You show me a photo of something. God only knows what. So, say it is THE bullet, then surely the experts can determine path, etc. ?

Clock

@shavixmir said
You show me a photo of something. God only knows what. So, say it is THE bullet, then surely the experts can determine path, etc. ?
how have you let the left brainwash you into denying what you see with your own eyes?

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople said
how have you let the left brainwash you into denying what you see with your own eyes?
Yeah. That must be it.

The whole world disagrees with you, and only the maga-morons are correct.

Do you realise how deluded you sound?

Clock

an idiot sees an attempted assassination on live tv and the media can convince the gullible fool that it didnt happen...it would be laughable if it wasnt so sad

Clock

Clock

-Removed-
In the photo allegedly showing a bullet in flight near Trump’s head, there is no indication that the two objects are in the same plane. The alleged bullet (actually just a gray smear easily photoshopped) could be 10 feet behind Trump and therefore no danger to him at all.

I have seen no evidence whatsoever that the wound to Trump’s ear was caused by a bullet. I personally strongly suspect that it was caused by some other object, and that it may have been self-inflicted.

Clock

@Cliff-Mashburn said
What difference does it make?
That is a fantastic question.

Is it somehow less heroic or sympathetic to get cut in the face by shrapnel than by a bullet?

Why people are worrying about this is beyond me.

Clock

@Mott-The-Hoople said
an idiot sees an attempted assassination on live tv and the media can convince the gullible fool that it didnt happen...it would be laughable if it wasnt so sad
Nobody I know thinks the assassination was fake.

But, funny how so many maga-morons think January the 6th didn’t happen the way everyone else seen it happen. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so sad.

Clock

-Removed-
I concur with that having looked at it many times to see if I was missing something. Someone had pointed that fact out, it may have even been you. I can't disagree with you on that one.

-VR

Clock

@moonbus said
In the photo allegedly showing a bullet in flight near Trump’s head, there is no indication that the two objects are in the same plane. The alleged bullet (actually just a gray smear easily photoshopped) could be 10 feet behind Trump and therefore no danger to him at all.

I have seen no evidence whatsoever that the wound to Trump’s ear was caused by a bullet. I personally strongly suspect that it was caused by some other object, and that it may have been self-inflicted.
read it and weep

https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-rally-bullet-trajectory-analysis-contradicts-fbi-shrapnel-testimony-capitol-hill-report

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.