@averagejoe1 saidDo you even understand what 'confirmation bias' is?
Yeah, I hate it that some links/articles are from FOX, but your media does not carry such stuff, and I have a duty to keep you apprised. I am quite confident that you did not know of this latest WOKE power grab till I showed it to you. Cool, huh?
You're welcome.
What am I saying? Of course you don't.
@averagejoe1 saidIt'll be a cold day in hell when I have a "spouse".
So, back to the question. You walk up to Geroge and Sally, and say "I would like for you to meet my spouse, Mott."
I cannot even bring myself to entertain such a statement. A bit off-puting, don't you think?
My Barbie doesn't need a useless Ken.
@averagejoe1 saidThere are uncontrolled wild fires burning across the world, and you’re worried about “spouse”?? Yeah, I see where the problem is.
Yeah, I hate it that some links/articles are from FOX, but your media does not carry such stuff, and I have a duty to keep you apprised. I am quite confident that you did not know of this latest WOKE power grab till I showed it to you. Cool, huh?
You're welcome.
@moonbus saidThink big Moonbus, you can do it. There are many many movements to change our society, this is just one, so I use it to remind you fellers what is indeed going on that are man-made wildfires. We are suffering a man-made wildfire, many of them. You write like a child.
There are uncontrolled wild fires burning across the world, and you’re worried about “spouse”?? Yeah, I see where the problem is.
Here is something for your level.....What's worse, having a crazy sister named Mary (Trump's sister) saying her brother is a big meanie, or immediately banging your brother's widow? It is amazing that you fellers defend this criminal Hunter.
@Rajk999
" I now pronounce you spouse and spouse". The sickening WOKE abberants have not thought this ahead. Or, the priest could say "I now pronounce you......... 🤔 ......... 🤔......spouses.'
Do you think libs get sort of sick of themselves on occasion? Especially on the parasite days, when they go to the mailbox for succor?
@averagejoe1 saidWhy are you obsessed with Hunter? He’s a side show.
Think big Moonbus, you can do it. There are many many movements to change our society, this is just one, so I use it to remind you fellers what is indeed going on that are man-made wildfires. We are suffering a man-made wildfire, many of them. You write like a child.
Here is something for your level.....What's worse, having a crazy sister named Mary (Trump's sist ...[text shortened]... mediately banging your brother's widow? It is amazing that you fellers defend this criminal Hunter.
@averagejoe1 said“Your media”
Yeah, I hate it that some links/articles are from FOX, but your media does not carry such stuff, and I have a duty to keep you apprised. I am quite confident that you did not know of this latest WOKE power grab till I showed it to you. Cool, huh?
You're welcome.
You mean 95% of the world’s news channels.
That should be sending you a message.
@AverageJoe1
In ancient Rome, marriages were based on convenience and anyone who called their spouse a spouse was good enough for them. Of course NOW to be 'married' is a RELIGIOUS vow and should be banned.
I imagine you think God is male, therefore because YOU are male, you must be higher on the evolutionary scale, oops, sorry, you don't like evolution either, but there is that passage in the bible saying men are worth 50 shekels but women are only worth 30. Sure, a god would say that, kind of ignoring the fact if there were no women, our human race would last just as long as the last man dies.
But of course since it is enshrined in the bible, well then, MEN are WAY superior to women and that allows marriages in the 19th century to be absolute, where the man is the absolute master and he can legally rape his wife all her married life and nobody can say a thing about it.
So if two people tell the world they are going to life together, what fukkking business is it of YOURS to say different?
Man and woman, man and man, woman and woman, NONE of your business but since you consider yourself infinitely superior to ANY democrat or gay person you feel you have the backing of GOD to say Marriage is for a man and a woman and if any other combination happens PUT THOSE CRETINS IN JAIL.
Like I said, it is ZERO of your business who is with whom.
If two of the same sex want to live together and have sex every day BUZZ OFF you POS.
You are REALLY stupid if you think Fox news puts out the truth.
But I would not put it pass you for you to think EVERYONE else is BS while Fox is golden.
One of these days you will wake up and smell the coffee but till then, good luck with your media bias.
Fox news owned by good ole Rupert puts out trash KNOWINGLY because they make money doing that and they admitted it in internal emails amongst the leaders which were leaked out and of course Fox news would never admit to that publicly because they would lose money if they did.
So you believe every rotten word they puke out.
@moonbus saidAhhhhh, but he is a great source for evidence to break up a crime family that he is part of. Like, Michael Corleone would be as the son of mafia boss played by Brando. I guess the main reason is that he used our jet, at our expense, to fly to China, et al, to collect all the bribes. Boy that made me obsessed!!!
Why are you obsessed with Hunter? He’s a side show.
@suzianne saidAVjoe knows not about confirmation bias. Sounds like something you learned from the Bot in one of his edification posts.
Do you even understand what 'confirmation bias' is?
What am I saying? Of course you don't.
Note: Not one of you has anything but praise for the changing of our language. Do you not find that odd?
@averagejoe1 saidNo. Not at all. You're the only one who's trying to make it a problem.
AVjoe knows not about confirmation bias. Sounds like something you learned from the Bot in one of his edification posts.
Note: Not one of you has anything but praise for the changing of our language. Do you not find that odd?
And on that note, what right has any American to criticise the changes happening in the English language, given that you're the initiator of practically all of them?
@kewpie saidThere are so MANY liberal changes before us, though. Take this one, just yesterday, I think. Congress wants to pierce the chambers of the Supreme Court and regulate it. There is no constitutional provision allowing that. Next,, they will put people like Sonhouse in the court room for their advice from the common man. You see, the judges are not common.
No. Not at all. You're the only one who's trying to make it a problem.
And on that note, what right has any American to criticise the changes happening in the English language, given that you're the initiator of practically all of them?
Why do the liberals find something to change Every Day? What in the heck?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/20/us/politics/senate-supreme-court-ethics-rules.html