Go back
Dominion unlikely to get $787.5M from Fox

Dominion unlikely to get $787.5M from Fox

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@sonhouse
Certain news media outlets are willing to lose money to silence people telling the truth. Phil Donahue was a big money maker just like Carlson was, but there was more money to make invading Iraq.

https://www.democracynow.org/2013/3/21/phil_donahue_on_his_2003_firing

This is proof you can get fired for telling the truth about war, even if you are bringing MSNBC a lot of money. Phil was super popular back then. The women loved him.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
You can't appeal a civil settlement, idiot.
You are not only a liar, but you are a horrible liar because you keep getting caught lying. Trump is appealing E. Carol's civil settlement against him.....idiot!

How did you convince sh76 you are a lawyer? sh76 is either extremely gullible or he is not a lawyer any more than you are.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
You're a pathetic moron. Nowhere in the article does it says that Dominion won't get paid the full amount of the settlement made by it and Fox because of the lies on the network regarding the company. That Fox might be able to deduct the payment from its taxes doesn't mean it isn't paying Dominion the full amount; it merely means it will be able to defray part of the cos ...[text shortened]... up the word "defray" for further information.

So "Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million" is true.
Nope, cable and satellite TV viewers are.

https://theintercept.com/2023/04/19/fox-news-dominion-settlement/

You still cannot prove Tucker lied about dominion. All he did was say what the forensic analysis report said. Even if the report was wrong you cannot honestly call Tucker a liar. At best you can say he was duped and there is no evidence he was duped either.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
16 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
You are not only a liar, but you are a horrible liar because you keep getting caught lying. Trump is appealing E. Carol's civil settlement against him.....idiot!

How did you convince sh76 you are a lawyer? sh76 is either extremely gullible or he is not a lawyer any more than you are.
You moron; that was a jury award, not a settlement!:

"
E. Jean Carroll has prevailed in her civil trial against Donald Trump with a federal jury finding the former president liable for battery and defamation and awarding the writer $5 million."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/carroll-trump-jury-deliberations/index.html

If you weren't such an obnoxious worm, you'd apologize for such stupidity.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89763
Clock
16 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
Sidney Powell probably did tell lies, but that does not prove Tucker lied. What does Powell have to do with Tucker?

You have proven nothing. You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that? I doubt it. It is likely pending appeal.
Seriously, if you dig this hole any deeper, we’ll have to send a rescue party to find you.

I mean, hypothetically speaking we would. The chances are larger we’ll just go on our way, whistling and kicking a can down the streets.

Everything you write here is stupid. Stop it already.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23
1 edit

@shavixmir
You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that?

Anyone who claims Fox paid Dominion 787.5 M needs to prove it. Assumption related assertions are over rated. Prove Fox paid Dominion anything. Then prove how much.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fox-news-dominion-settlement-lawsuit-b2325314.html

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
You moron; that was a jury award, not a settlement!:

"
E. Jean Carroll has prevailed in her civil trial against Donald Trump with a federal jury finding the former president liable for battery and defamation and awarding the writer $5 million."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/carroll-trump-jury-deliberations/index.html

If you weren't such an obnoxious worm, you'd apologize for such stupidity.
So it has nothing to do with a civil lawsuit.
Why did you bring it up? That would apply to any settlement.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89763
Clock
16 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
@shavixmir
You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that?

Anyone who claims Fox paid Dominion 787.5 M needs to prove it. Assumption related assertions are over rated. Prove Fox paid Dominion anything. Then prove how much.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fox-news-dominion-settlement-lawsuit-b2325314.html
🥱

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
16 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
So it has nothing to do with a civil lawsuit.
Why did you bring it up? That would apply to any settlement.
Because some fool suggested Fox was appealing the settlement.

Any idea who that numbskull was?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
16 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
@shavixmir
You have not even proved Fox has paid Dominion anything yet. Can you do that?

Anyone who claims Fox paid Dominion 787.5 M needs to prove it. Assumption related assertions are over rated. Prove Fox paid Dominion anything. Then prove how much.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fox-news-dominion-settlement-lawsuit-b2325314.html
You lose, John Poulos is Dominion's CEO:

"The number on the paper was “just slightly higher” than what Dominion’s independent expert had valued Dominion at on Election Day 2020, said Poulos. While he believed a jury would side in Dominion’s favor, the remaining question came down to whether the jury would decide on a figure that was higher or lower than the number presented on the paper.

By the time Poulos left the courtroom, the money had been wired."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/dominion-ceo-describes-deliberation-around-7875-mln-settlement-with-fox-2023-05-10/

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
Because some fool suggested Fox was appealing the settlement.

Any idea who that numbskull was?
Because some fool suggested a civil lawsuit had something to do with it when it was completely irrelevant. All you had to say was settlements cannot be appealed. A civil lawsuit has nothing to do with it at all. A real lawyer would not make such a stupid mistake.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
16 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
You lose, John Poulos is Dominion's CEO:

"The number on the paper was “just slightly higher” than what Dominion’s independent expert had valued Dominion at on Election Day 2020, said Poulos. While he believed a jury would side in Dominion’s favor, the remaining question came down to whether the jury would decide on a figure that was higher or lower than the number pres ...[text shortened]... euters.com/legal/dominion-ceo-describes-deliberation-around-7875-mln-settlement-with-fox-2023-05-10/
Nope. How much money?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
17 Jul 23

@no1marauder

Something fishy here.

First, corporate executives don’t give away $787 million of shareholders’ money without a test of the claim in court.

Second, it is not defamation to report the news. Tucker Carlson reported the claims of experts. That is news reporting. Dominion’s defamation lawsuit should have been filed against the experts. It wasn’t, because the experts had the evidence.

Third, Experts supplied evidence that the Dominion voting machines could be programmed to count votes differently from how the votes were cast; experts supplied evidence that the machines could be hacked; experts supplied evidence that the voting machines were connected to the Internet. Fox News could have called these experts as expert witnesses. By agreeing to settle, Fox News refused the evidence its day in court. Why?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/fox-news-decision-settle-dominion-lawsuit-more-than-three-quarters-billion-dollars-makes-no-sense/5817237

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
17 Jul 23

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder

Something fishy here.

First, corporate executives don’t give away $787 million of shareholders’ money without a test of the claim in court.

Second, it is not defamation to report the news. Tucker Carlson reported the claims of experts. That is news reporting. Dominion’s defamation lawsuit should have been filed against the experts. It wasn’t, bec ...[text shortened]... ews-decision-settle-dominion-lawsuit-more-than-three-quarters-billion-dollars-makes-no-sense/5817237
Maybe Fox and its lawyers aren't as stupid as you.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
17 Jul 23

@no1marauder said
Maybe Fox and its lawyers aren't as stupid as you.
Why didn't Dominion sue allied security operations group? Dominion said they lied.
Tucker is not liable for reporting results of the forensic audit ASOG did. If you think he is you are stupid.

Like Phil Donahue, he was fired for telling the truth. ASOG told the lies according to Dominion and you. Tucker was speaking out against US support for the Ukraine war. The military industrial complex leaned on Fox to silence Tucker as well as big pharma.

You have no idea how much Fox will pay Dominion. Admit it. You were spreading misinformation.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.