22 Jul 08
Originally posted by smw6869To repeat myself, I agree with law-abiding citizens having the right to own guns. What I object to is judicial activism -- I'm not interested in overturning the ruling on the 2nd amendment, just in pointing out the judicial activism by the five conservative judges. It's hypocritical given that Bush and McCain have been claiming that their conservative appointees would interpret the Constitution strictly. That simply didn't happen in this case.
Talk to the hand the head ain't listening! Get used to it! It's a done deal!
GRANNY.
22 Jul 08
Originally posted by karnachzSo says you. You should be a judge. You don't agree with the judges?.......So! Did you read what the founding fathers thought about the 2nd? Very easy to understand!
To repeat myself, I agree with law-abiding citizens having the right to own guns. What I object to is judicial activism -- I'm not interested in overturning the ruling on the 2nd amendment, just in pointing out the judicial activism by the five conservative judges. It's hypocritical given that Bush and McCain have been claiming that their conservative appointees would interpret the Constitution strictly. That simply didn't happen in this case.
GRANNY.
22 Jul 08
Originally posted by smw6869I'd be interested to see a link (not that Webster thing that I've already read and replied to).
So says you. You should be a judge. You don't agree with the judges?.......So! Did you read what the founding fathers thought about the 2nd? Very easy to understand!
GRANNY.
