@earl-of-trumps saidIt's not a new world for me, but I do enjoy ranting about it. What the heck? These guys (politicians) are going to complain about infrastructure projects and ignore the obscene waste going on at the Pentagon. Their own self-audit identified tens of billions of waste in the system - well beyond weapons-system development - and what did congress do the next year? RAISE THE BUDGET! The auditors billed the US Treasury for $417 million! Everybody ok with that or are we going to keep complaining about the high cost of infrastructure projects that might actually have some benefit?
Welcome to the world of the Vast Military-Industrial Complex. Should we believe Eisenhower now?
@kmax87 saidIf someone did do that, it'd be irrelevant. Defense is a corporate welfare jobs program. Like when you learn how to make a wooden box in shop class.
Has anyone ever done the math in terms of the least minimum spend that America could have made on defense and still have maintained its hegemonic position?
EDIT: I hate to quote Rumsfeld, but its all about unknown unknowns you know.
Scientists talk about the unknown unknowns all the time, that doesn't justify spending trillions willy nilly. Conquest and regime change may be different though.
@wildgrass saidThe US demands supremacy in all its defence systems. And they are not doing it on a budget. So while it may be true that billions are being wasted in the procurement process, the open ended nature of being the best tends to produce waste. That everyone else keeps up (barely just) is more a function of the wasteful process producing a tangible product. Its always easier for the guy emulating and adapting to produce something similar, because they know what they are working towards. Being a hegomon is hard work.
If someone did do that, it'd be irrelevant. Defense is a corporate welfare jobs program. Like when you learn how to make a wooden box in shop class.
Scientists talk about the unknown unknowns all the time, that doesn't justify spending trillions willy nilly. Conquest and regime change may be different though.
@kmax87 saidCould we pivot to hegemony of sustainable energy? Hegemony of space flight? Going to Mars only cost 0.1% of the entire F-35 budget. We could probably have a fleet of space stations for $1.9 trillion.
The US demands supremacy in all its defence systems. And they are not doing it on a budget. So while it may be true that billions are being wasted in the procurement process, the open ended nature of being the best tends to produce waste. That everyone else keeps up (barely just) is more a function of the wasteful process producing a tangible product. Its always easier for the ...[text shortened]... ce something similar, because they know what they are working towards. Being a hegomon is hard work.
The post that was quoted here has been removedRemorse...? I think "outrage" is a better term.
Taking out an elected head of state of an sovereign nation.
watching 700,000 people die in the ensuing sectarian violence, as a result.
Destroying the infrastructure of a nation.
And the US Big Gov lied their ass off the whole way doing it.
@wildgrass saidI do too, but they are just corrupt puppets doing the bidding of the money changers. Know who is pulling the strings from behind the scenes. Oh, that's right....the share holders of the privately owned FRS is a secret.
I resent the politicians who pretend to be fiscally responsible with tax dollars. They're on the Senate floor now arguing that we shouldn't have libraries anymore if they can't be self-sufficient, but the same person supports a program to develop and build fancy jets that don't do anything but cost thousands of times more than the library line item.
A good first step is to make the shareholders of the FRS public. They are behind all of that crap.
@metal-brain saidDamn, when I saw you’d posted on this thread, I was hoping you were going to write about secret alien technology, the highly secret F-227g being developed at Area 51 and sonic bubble-technology.
I do too, but they are just corrupt puppets doing the bidding of the money changers. Know who is pulling the strings from behind the scenes. Oh, that's right....the share holders of the privately owned FRS is a secret.
A good first step is to make the shareholders of the FRS public. They are behind all of that crap.
You always end up disappointing me.