1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedThis article estimates that 9 manned missions to Mars would cost substantially less than the price tag of the F-35:
A ballpark cost of the first Mars mission in 2035 would total $230 billion. Second and subsequent missions, occurring at three-year intervals, would cost about $142 billion each including SLS and Orion costs.... if we send nine crews to Mars, the total bill would be in the neighborhood of $1.5 trillion.https://spacenews.com/op-ed-mars-for-only-1-5-trillion/
2 edits
The post that was quoted here has been removedThe timeline you have here suggests we could launch humans to Mars tomorrow without any initial investment. But it'd need at least 15 years of funding before the first mission would launch.
In terms of cost overruns. Yeah, lol, kinda like the F-35. But keep in mind this number as is is still hundreds of billions less than the F-35 project. Would you rather have an obsolete jet or a moon colony?
The post that was quoted here has been removedIt sounds like you're saying that all the technology exists save for the ability to launch speedy rescue missions?
If you were an American taxpayer, would you rather pay for A) a fancy upgrade to a jet that already did a pretty good job blowing things up or B) a colony of humans on Mars.
