Face masks don't help and never did

@wajoma said
Which one? What is it supposed to say?

Here is how it's done:

No1misrepresenter in chief:

"...few malcontents insisting on their "right" to spread diseases."

I have never said this, it has never been my position.

So either you're walking back on it with a retraction and an apology or you can quote me saying it.

@no1marauder said
Of course it is. I don't need to supply a verbatim quote when that is the practical result of your anti-COVID mitigation positions; you constantly and consistently oppose any mandatory measures that would protect others from the spread of a contagious disease from those refusing to comply with reasonable precautions imposed by democratically elected governments to protect ...[text shortened]... quences of these extreme positions but I am under no obligation to ignore them. You're owed nothing.

@no1marauder said
Of course it is. I don't need to supply a verbatim quote when that is the practical result of your anti-COVID mitigation positions; you constantly and consistently oppose any mandatory measures that would protect others from the spread of a contagious disease from those refusing to comply with reasonable precautions imposed by democratically elected governments to protect ...[text shortened]... quences of these extreme positions but I am under no obligation to ignore them. You're owed nothing.

@wajoma said
BTW are you ready to admit the real life consequences of people that have died or been injured by the experimental juice after the coercion that dampens your panties. Or the consequences of people passing on the wuflu because they falsely believed in the majical powers of the juice or masks. (shag doody thinks masks can contain a sneeze FFS)

@wajoma said
Misrepresentation in the first case, we'll write it off as a misunderstanding.

Your continued misrepresentation when it's been explained to you in child level terms must be called what it is; lying.

As per the Shakespeare quote it is a natural consequence of being dishonest with the self.

@no1marauder said
Really your claims that someone is "lying," by accurately describing your positions is laughable BS.

For example, although the unvaccinated present a greater risk of spreading this contagious disease to others, you deny a democratically elected government has a legitimate power to limit them from occupations like health care where others must bear an increased risk bec ...[text shortened]... unvaccinated's choices. What is this but asserting in reality a "right" to spread disease to others?

@no1marauder said
Really your claims that someone is "lying," by accurately describing your positions is laughable BS.

For example, although the unvaccinated present a greater risk of spreading this contagious disease to others, you deny a democratically elected government has a legitimate power to limit them from occupations like health care where others must bear an increased risk bec ...[text shortened]... unvaccinated's choices. What is this but asserting in reality a "right" to spread disease to others?

@wajoma said
No one is allowed to go about spreading disease, I have never said that, it would be a form of assault, rather than misrepresenting (aka lying) my position you should show exactly where I have stated that as a right.

This needs to be acknowledged first.

'Elected officials' is not the measurement of what is right or wrong. I suggest you drop it, it does nothing for your argument.

@no1marauder said
No, you're not allowed to take positions that you know will cause the disease to spread by blocking reasonable precautions imposed by democratically elected governments and then claim "No one is allowed to go about spreading disease". I have not "misrepresented" your position in the slightest; you have and continue to advocate opposition to measures which protect the publ ...[text shortened]... ch protect the public health. I have no interest in any "suggestion" of yours that claims otherwise.

@wajoma said
No one has a right to spread disease, can't dumb it down anymore for you, we're done.

@no1marauder said
That's a meaningless bromide when your policy preferences allow and even encourage them to do so.

@wajoma said
It's been my position all the way, it'd be a form of assault, do you know what 'we're done' means at least or are you going to misrepresent that too, then lie to yourself.

How is this thread of right-wing moronity still staggering onwards?

@shavixmir said
How is this thread of right-wing moronity still staggering onwards?

@no1marauder said
No, you're not allowed to take positions that you know will cause the disease to spread by blocking reasonable precautions imposed by democratically elected governments and then claim "No one is allowed to go about spreading disease". I have not "misrepresented" your position in the slightest; you have and continue to advocate opposition to measures which protect the publ ...[text shortened]... ch protect the public health. I have no interest in any "suggestion" of yours that claims otherwise.