09 May 10
Originally posted by generalissimoFMF views the world through polarized glasses 😵.
[b]Unfortunately, the "right" here is typified by the likes of yourself, zeeblebot, and peanutpicker41, Sartor Resartus, Hugh Glass, whodey, generalissimo, Phil3000, utherpendragon et al, and is thus woefully understrength as far as insight and common sense are concerned
The fact that you put me alongside the likes of sartor resartus and peanut ...[text shortened]... iticize them frequently), and yet here you imply we are the same type of people. Ludicrous.[/b]
you either ARE, or you AREN'T.
10 May 10
Originally posted by generalissimoI implied nothing of the sort and whether rightwingers agree with each other all the time is irrelevant to what I said. Which was: the "right wing" is quite poorly represented at RHP. With some obvious exceptions who contribute valuably and convincingly, the majority of "right wing" posters here seem inarticulate, ignorant, meanspirited, or unable to embrace things broadly or thoughfully. It's a shame.
I don't remember ever agreeing with those individuals [sartor resartus and peanutpicker] (as a matter of fact I actually criticize them frequently), and yet here you imply we are the same type of people.
10 May 10
1 edit
Originally posted by zeeblebotAbsolutely. I do see posting through rather polarized glasses. People either ARE effective contributors or they AREN'T. I think RHP's "right wing" needs to raise its game. It probably has less than half a dozen worthy debaters here. Credible posters with centrist or lefty views probably outnumber then four or five times.
FMF views the world through polarized glasses. you either ARE, or you AREN'T.
10 May 10
Originally posted by FMF"The left-wing of RHP is truly weak in their arguments, its really a shame that they should be represented by the likes of sherzo, adam warlock, no1, and FMF. I really hope they educate themselves and improve their performance and debate techniques."
I implied nothing of the sort and whether rightwingers agree with each other all the time is irrelevant to what I said. Which was: the "right wing" is quite poorly represented at RHP. With some obvious exceptions who contribute valuably and convincingly, the majority of "right wing" posters here seem inarticulate, ignorant, meanspirited, or unable to embrace things broadly or thoughfully. It's a shame.
right, so I just put you in a list alongside the most notorious loons on this website, but hey, Im not in any way implying you are like them. 🙄
the majority of "right wing" posters here seem inarticulate, ignorant, meanspirited, or unable to embrace things broadly or thoughfully. It's a shame.
just like the same can be said about the majority of leftists here, yourself included.
Im not going to ask you to explain your vague and unsubstantiated generalizations for I know you're just going to avoid any real discussion by either attacking me personally or simply refusing to be objective, so in what way are you different from all those inarticulate right-wing posters you just mentioned?
11 May 10
Originally posted by zeeblebotGlen Beck agrees with the Obama Administration on this one.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/05/administration-faces-criticism-mirandizing-times-square-suspect/
Updated May 05, 2010
Administration Faces Criticism for Mirandizing Times Square Suspect
The sky is falling the sky is falling/...........
11 May 10
2 edits
Originally posted by zeeblebotif go on criticizing him, soon he will accuse of going into generalissimo mode just like he did to some other poster in another thread, the unintended consequence of his trollish replies is that they only prove my point.
most of THEM can spell "inarticulate" 😵
🙄