@quackquack saidRace, gender, nationality and a whole host of other variables are critically important in deciding who to choose for president in any country... unless of course the slate of candidates are all generic robots made by IRobot Corp. Dont kid yourself.
It is a dumb goal. People should vote for the best candidate. Voting for someone just because they are female is as dumb and backwards as not voting for someone because of their skin color.
We shouldn't stereotype people based on their gender and for a serious candidate for the president of the United States we should actually know their positions not just guess that a female would support certain issues.
@rajk999 saidThen you shouldn't be upset if white males refuse to vote for someone like Kamala Harris.
Race, gender, nationality and a whole host of other variables are critically important in deciding who to choose for president in any country... unless of course the slate of candidates are all generic robots made by IRobot Corp. Dont kid yourself.
24 Aug 21
@quackquack saidWho said I was.
Then you shouldn't be upset if white males refuse to vote for someone like Kamala Harris.
24 Aug 21
@c-i-v saidI like your 'Laughing Clown' description . , It is perfect. She will be president shortly, unless some Dem coup takes place and they put someone else in, but man this forum is going to smoke if she is president. As will the country, unfortunately.
@mchill
When old Joe is removed and the laughing clown Kamala is president you'll blame Trump for her failures 🙄
Voting for someone based on gender/race is retarded.
Go back to your precious tactics and not improving.
1300 at chess dot com is pathetic.
I would not vote for her to preside over our nation. Who here would, well, vote for her. It is hard to even type.
24 Aug 21
@AverageJoe1
According to mchill all that is needed is a female and everything will be A-OK 👌
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
24 Aug 21
@mchill saidYou only elect one every four years, not every fourteen months when the government falls as some countries do.
No less than 40 nations have had female leaders since the 1960's. Why can't America, the (so called) beacon of Democracy and opportunity in the world manage to do this??
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/06/politics/women-world-leaders/
Note that the Netherlands have also never had a female prime minister, though we can at least pretend that having had a queen regnant all last century is an excuse.
24 Aug 21
@quackquack saidHillary was the best candidate in 2016. What happened?
It is a dumb goal. People should vote for the best candidate. Voting for someone just because they are female is as dumb and backwards as not voting for someone because of their skin color.
We shouldn't stereotype people based on their gender and for a serious candidate for the president of the United States we should actually know their positions not just guess that a female would support certain issues.
White men's fear is what happened.
24 Aug 21
@lemondrop saidLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Kamala Harris will be your first female president
and she will be fantastic
thats what harris will do
24 Aug 21
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd Trump carried his around plastered to him.
her dirt caught up with her
It didn't hurt him at all, because his supporters are all idiots.
24 Aug 21
@mott-the-hoople saidthat's what I'll be doing every time one of you jackoffs gets your panties in a bunch
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
thats what harris will do