@Mott-The-Hoople saidYour reporting on this is incomplete.
π Fox has a “mixed” rating. that means they report BOTH sides
your link has a “high” left bias
and you think you have a point…π
Look at the Fox News bias line.
They may have "mixed" content, but their bias line is still "Extreme Right".
I'm sure it is no mistake that you left this out.
144d
@KellyJay saidAren't you the one who always crows about how important truth is? Who cares whether it's independent, so long as what is reported is true? Fox has a long ways to go to achieve respectability on that score.
Like I said when all coverage uses the same verbiage it’s not likely independent!
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAccording to your article the PBS anchor used Axios and Reuters as sources. Both are reputable and usually reliable.
I thought you got your news from pbs? π
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-815929
That Fox News moron cited her "friend's wife".
Honest mistake vs. deliberate lie.
144d
@Mott-The-Hoople
Oh yeah, who would EVER listen to PBS, HAHA, such a joke. Pubic Broadcasting network. What a trashy site. Pubes everywhere in sight, no balls.
144d
@Mott-The-Hoople
You really get dumber day by day. You really need to take your dementia meds so you can keep up with adults here.
Even FOX says they are not a news organization, they say they are ENTERTAINMENT.
Which means they can puke out whatever POS BS they want and you can bet your ass it won't be to make Kamala look good.
144d
@moonbus saidGood point, I agree is it true is primary, so casting about dozens of charges is only pouring it on hoping something sticks. This also means simply casting doubts because CNN or Fox says something, simply because it is CNN or Fox should never be a reason to accept or reject anything. The specifics need to be hashed out, even people of good faith can be wrong or right.
Aren't you the one who always crows about how important truth is? Who cares whether it's independent, so long as what is reported is true? Fox has a long ways to go to achieve respectability on that score.
144d
@sonhouse saidπ what kind of fool thinks fox news is not a news organization?
@Mott-The-Hoople
You really get dumber day by day. You really need to take your dementia meds so you can keep up with adults here.
Even FOX says they are not a news organization, they say they are ENTERTAINMENT.
Which means they can puke out whatever POS BS they want and you can bet your ass it won't be to make Kamala look good.
you idiots don’t understand the difference between news reporting and commentary .π
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo one watches Fox for news reporting.
π what kind of fool thinks fox news is not a news organization?
you idiots don’t understand the difference between news reporting and commentary .π
When Fox called Arizona for Biden in the 2020 election, their ratings plummeted because their viewers were outraged and started watching Newsmax...even though they were correct:
https://www.vox.com/2021/7/28/22594550/newsmax-ratings-dive-explained
This is why they really aren't news: Fox viewers don't care about accurate reporting, they care about what they want to hear. And that's exactly what Fox delivers.
Fox may meet some legal threshold for "news" but Fox is a news organization in the same way candy corn is technically food.
144d
@vivify saidhttps://thehill.com/homenews/media/4360708-fox-news-top-rated-cable-news-channel/
No one watches Fox for news reporting.
When Fox called Arizona for Biden in the 2020 election, their ratings plummeted because their viewers were outraged and started watching Newsmax...even though they were correct:
https://www.vox.com/2021/7/28/22594550/newsmax-ratings-dive-explained
This is why they really aren't news: Fox viewers don't care about accurate report ...[text shortened]... threshold for "news" but Fox is a news organization in the same way candy corn is technically food.
π
144d
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNotice I said in 2020, around the election.
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4360708-fox-news-top-rated-cable-news-channel/
π
You're getting easier to refute each time you post.
144d
@sonhouse saidIf they were independent why do have the same stories and many times use the same key words while reporting?
@KellyJay
What do you want? Your god to come down and go "I condemn MSMBC and Rachel Maddow in particular for her false reporting'.
Do you not care for independent review of news sites?
Do you for instance not believe Fox news is biased in favor of Trump and publishes really stupid pieces showing how great Trump is but when fact checked the finding is inevitably BS writing hoping the public won't catch on.?
144d
@sonhouse saidEvery one of us will stand before God and give an account of our words and deeds, and our silence when we know we should have spoken up. God is not going to judge us according to what He hears us say, or what He sees, instead, it will be according to righteousness and with that, He does not grade on a curve. You can be quick to condemn one while excusing another for the same or worse you think you will not be condemned for that?
@KellyJay
What do you want? Your god to come down and go "I condemn MSMBC and Rachel Maddow in particular for her false reporting'.
Do you not care for independent review of news sites?
Do you for instance not believe Fox news is biased in favor of Trump and publishes really stupid pieces showing how great Trump is but when fact checked the finding is inevitably BS writing hoping the public won't catch on.?