22 Jan 08
3 edits
Originally posted by Darth Spongethat is what passes for intelligent discourse in the republican party. As soon as someone holds them accountable for their actions, they wrap themselves in the American flag like a shield of invulnerability. The only problem is that I don't buy into their jingoistic notion of patriotism. Theirs is a poor substitute for real patriotism.
you guys are all class, really.
As to what can be done; re-regulation is a step in the right direction. increase taxes on the top 2% in our country, get the hell out of Iraq, and balance the budget. And if anyone is wondering, it is highly unlikely that anyone on this site is in the top 2%. If the rich pay their fair share of taxes, then the middle class can pay less.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by duecerYou sir,are a full of grap Phony. Don't you know the big corps. own the Republican Party with their big money and evil ways. They bought GW the White House. They are the evil of western society, yet you aid and abet corps. by buying there stocks, no doubt in an effort to make a killing at the expense of the American WORKING class. Tell me about your TRUE patriotism, duecer bag. Could you repeat jingoistic one more time, it's so original.
that is what passes for intelligent discourse in the republican party. As soon as someone holds them accountable for their actions, they wrap themselves in the American flag like a shield of invulnerability. The only problem is that I don't buy into their jingoistic notion of patriotism. Theirs is a poor substitute for real patriotism.
As to what can be do ...[text shortened]... s in the top 2%. If the rich pay their fair share of taxes, then the middle class can pay less.
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869yet you still support the rethuglicans. shame on you, exploiting our troops like that!ðŸ˜
You sir,are a full of grap Phony. Don't you know the big corps. own the Republican Party with their big money and evil ways. They bought GW the White House. They are the evil of western society, yet you aid and abet corps. by buying there stocks, no doubt in an effort to make a killing at the expense of the American WORKING class. Tell me about your TRUE patriotism, duecer bag. Could you repeat jingoistic one more time, it's so original.
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869Has passively absorbing Limbaugh's poison warped you so much that you can't engage in a conversation with someone with different opinions without resorting to idiotic childishness?
You sir,are a full of grap Phony. Don't you know the big corps. own the Republican Party with their big money and evil ways. They bought GW the White House. They are the evil of western society, yet you aid and abet corps. by buying there stocks, no doubt in an effort to make a killing at the expense of the American WORKING class. Tell me about your TRUE patriotism, duecer bag. Could you repeat jingoistic one more time, it's so original.
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by Darth SpongeThe idiotic childishness is supposed to be funny--an antidote to the sort of po-faced intellectualism represented by people who insist on --
Has passively absorbing Limbaugh's poison warped you so much that you can't engage in a conversation with someone with different opinions without resorting to idiotic childishness?
wait a minute, I just want to watch Chuck Norris on YouTube for a minute...
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by duecerI'm Not a Republican. I did not support going into Iraq. I think Bush is a moron for doing it, but the troops ARE there and i support them 100%. I don't call them rapists and baby killers. Those soliders aren't fighting for The American Way, mom's apple pie, or the poor Iraqis. They're fighting for each other. They're fighting for the guy next to them. You should know, having been in combat. They deserve to come home victorious, but you're more concerned about the politics of Dems. vs. Reps. and they're stuck in the middle. It's people like you who give the enemy courage to go on, but, my bad, you're a True patriot.
yet you still support the rethuglicans. shame on you, exploiting our troops like that!ðŸ˜
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by Darth SpongePossibly you can't read, Chief. I've already posted that i don't listen to that nut job. Can't you understand? Are you a child? Duecer is a phony, he claims to want to honor our soldiers, but continues to put them down every chance he gets. Put that in your peace pipe. Oops, i forgot, he's a true patriot and corporate as kisser.
Has passively absorbing Limbaugh's poison warped you so much that you can't engage in a conversation with someone with different opinions without resorting to idiotic childishness?
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869if the war in Iraq is wrong, then wouldn't Support the Troops mean bringing them home to their families?
I'm Not a Republican. I did not support going into Iraq. I think Bush is a moron for doing it, but the troops ARE there and i support them 100%. I don't call them rapists and baby killers. Those soliders aren't fighting for The American Way, mom's apple pie, or the poor Iraqis. They're fighting for each other. They're fighting for the guy next to them. You ...[text shortened]... ike you who give the enemy courage to go on, but, my bad, you're a True patriot.
G.
surely you're aware that the phrase "Support the Troops" gets trotted out by the White House every time they need more money for the war, but you still hear about soldiers without body armor or armored vehicles- but the mercenary contractors are somehow fully prepared, so I think that the phrase "Support the Troops" as it's used by the White House and politicians, is propaganda, with little or no regard for the actual men and women fighting the war, just a means of playing the system for more war money.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by Darth SpongeYes, it would mean bringing them home...with victory. It does not mean calling them rapist and baby killers. They went to war with what they had, thanks to the 50% cut in the military budget by Clinton. The body armor has been taken care of. Of course they need more money as long as the war lasts they'll need more money. What do you mean playing the system? We're not just fighting a war. We're trying to rebuild the country also. I don't know that the mercenary contracters are fully prepared. It's a shame that we need to hire mercenaries, because our own citizens don't have a hair on there as and won't enlist. Are you telling me Bush has no reguard for the troops fighting this war... he doesn't want to win? He just wants the money? You got some grazy weed in your peace pipe. Money means nothing to a Millionaire. He'd rather have the power gained by military victory.
if the war in Iraq is wrong, then wouldn't Support the Troops mean bringing them home to their families?
surely you're aware that the phrase "Support the Troops" gets trotted out by the White House every time they need more money for the war, but you still hear about soldiers without body armor or armored vehicles- but the mercenary contractors a ...[text shortened]... al men and women fighting the war, just a means of playing the system for more war money.
G.