22 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869it's incorrect the blame the military debacle in Iraq on Clinton's cuts to the Pentagon budget. How many years was Bush in office before we invaded Iraq?
Yes, it would mean bringing them home...with victory. It does not mean calling them rapist and baby killers. They went to war with what they had, thanks to the 50% cut in the military budget by Clinton. The body armor has been taken care of. Of course they need more money as long as the war lasts they'll need more money. What do you mean playing the system? ...[text shortened]... nothing to a Millionaire. He'd rather have the power gained by military victory.
G.
When Bush needs more money for war, he has to ask Congress for it, but Congress likes to pretend to uphold it's Constitutional duties and pretends to withhold the funds for awhile, so Bush accuses Democrats of failing to "Support the Troops", so they pass more war spending.
but this is nothing more than political posturing, because the Bush admin's actions show very little Support for the Troops.
to my analysis, Bush regards the men and women in the armed service as no more than cannon fodder for his wars. If he cared, then why force redeployments for servicemen who have been in Iraq for years? Why did the Bush admin cut Veteren's benefits by $1billion? Why do they refuse to adequately fund VA hospitals? Why have troops had to buy their own body armor on a salary scale that pales in comparison to corporate mercenaries doing the same jobs?
considering these, how can Bush claim to Support the Troops? Bush's actions indicate not only that he does not support the troops, but holds them in great contempt.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869You sir are in need of pysciatric care. Get a grip.
Possibly you can't read, Chief. I've already posted that i don't listen to that nut job. Can't you understand? Are you a child? Duecer is a phony, he claims to want to honor our soldiers, but continues to put them down every chance he gets. Put that in your peace pipe. Oops, i forgot, he's a true patriot and corporate as kisser.
G.
22 Jan 08
Originally posted by Darth SpongeI can't answer these questions. You're too paranoid.
it's incorrect the blame the military debacle in Iraq on Clinton's cuts to the Pentagon budget. How many years was Bush in office before we invaded Iraq?
When Bush needs more money for war, he has to ask Congress for it, but Congress likes to pretend to uphold it's Constitutional duties and pretends to withhold the funds for awhile, so Bush accuse ...[text shortened]... indicate not only that he does not support the troops, but holds them in great contempt.
Granny.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by duecerGlad to see that you want the middle class to suffer, such a caring liberal. Whose 401K's do you think are going to get hurt... the rich? You certainly are a deluded individual.
it seems the dow jones is in a bit of free fall today. 7 years of republican control is more than our economy can bare
Last Ilooked the unemployment rate under Republican control went down to lowest in decades... and economy is still growing.
I wanna know where all this talk of recession is coming from... the main stream media seems to be flaming the little sparks hoping to make a bonfire.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by duecerI could blame it on the Democratic controlled Congress and the Senate but then I would sound like you. The market is on a down swing right now so I would buy if I was you, instead of blaming a President who has no control of the Dow.
it seems the dow jones is in a bit of free fall today. 7 years of republican control is more than our economy can bare
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by SMSBear716The war in Iraq is doing better since the surge so the damn Dem's have to bitch about something. They sure as hell don't have any solutions to the problems.
Glad to see that you want the middle class to suffer, such a caring liberal. Whose 401K's do you think are going to get hurt... the rich? You certainly are a deluded individual.
Last Ilooked the unemployment rate under Republican control went down to lowest in decades... and economy is still growing.
I wanna know where all this talk of recession is ...[text shortened]... g from... the main stream media seems to be flaming the little sparks hoping to make a bonfire.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by SMSBear716At what point in this thread did I say I want the middle class to suffer? Am I delusional because I believe that GWB is the worst president in American history? If so, there are millions of delusional people all across America. I think perhaps you are projecting onto me , qualities you see in yourself, after all, how can anyone justify supporting that draft dodging hack of a politician.
Glad to see that you want the middle class to suffer, such a caring liberal. Whose 401K's do you think are going to get hurt... the rich? You certainly are a deluded individual.
Last Ilooked the unemployment rate under Republican control went down to lowest in decades... and economy is still growing.
I wanna know where all this talk of recession is ...[text shortened]... g from... the main stream media seems to be flaming the little sparks hoping to make a bonfire.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by duecerwell, duecer. We finally agree on one thing. That being that GW is a draft dodging loser. He didn't want to get shot at, but he wants my 19 year old daughter to do what he wouldn't. My daughter has been in Iraq for almost a year now, and she ain't no killer of innocent civilians.
At what point in this thread did I say I want the middle class to suffer? Am I delusional because I believe that GWB is the worst president in American history? If so, there are millions of delusional people all across America. I think perhaps you are projecting onto me , qualities you see in yourself, after all, how can anyone justify supporting that draft dodging hack of a politician.
Granny.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by StarValleyWyThings are way better in Cuba and Venezuela than they were when the capitalists were in power.
LOL
Cuba, China and Venezuela come to mind when one considers what happens when the rich are made poor... errrr.... the poor are made EQUAL.... errrr....
Can anyone explain why dems want to make Rich people poor as the preferred method to accomplishing "equality"? Why do repubs think it better to let poor people try to become rich? Are they heart ...[text shortened]... is nothing like a good dose of Socialism Ala Carter to purk up a good commie twenty year plan.
Of course there's fewer rich Americans over there paying to screw children. That's true. Must be a bummer for the rich.
23 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869damnit! we agree?😠I was just starting to enjoy the argument! anyway, I think we probably agree on a lot of things. I throw the term fascist around in response to the many posters who throw around the terms commie or socialist. No offense is intended, just making the point that if you look hard enough, you can apply parts of a description to anyone.. And just calling someone a commie doesn't make it true, just as calling someone fascist doesn't make it true.
well, duecer. We finally agree on one thing. That being that GW is a draft dodging loser. He didn't want to get shot at, but he wants my 19 year old daughter to do what he wouldn't. My daughter has been in Iraq for almost a year now, and she ain't no killer of innocent civilians.
Granny.