20 May 15
Originally posted by KazetNagorraKN thinks having children and being responsible for making that decision is analogous to committing crime and throwing litter out the car window.
That is one solution. A similar solution to crime would be to stop committing crimes, while pollution can be easily abolished by not polluting.
🙄
20 May 15
Originally posted by WajomaStop crime-> allow the abortion because stopping abortions is criminal.
KN thinks having children and being responsible for making that decision is analogous to committing crime and throwing litter out the car window.
🙄
Don't litter -> properly dispose of the fetus after the abortion.
20 May 15
Originally posted by Eladar"Let the person work out an individual agreement when the person starts employment."
From the leftist perspective:
Why give a woman special privilege because she didn't have an abortion?
Right wing perspective:
Let the person work out an individual agreement when the person starts employment.
yes, this works awesomely when one would be starving without the job and the other will still be a multi billion dollar company.
people reach mutually beneficial agreements only when they are on equal footing.
Originally posted by ZahlanziYou have something they value i.e. your time.
"Let the person work out an individual agreement when the person starts employment."
yes, this works awesomely when one would be starving without the job and the other will still be a multi billion dollar company.
people reach mutually beneficial agreements only when they are on equal footing.
They have something you value i.e. a salary
Equal footing.
Originally posted by Wajomadoes walmart needs your time as much as you need their salary?
You have something they value i.e. your time.
They have something you value i.e. a salary
Equal footing.
i don't know why i continue this discussion, you are obviously trolling. nobody is stupid enough to think someone looking to get a cashier job at walmart is on equal footing with freakin walmart and has any bargaining chips.
20 May 15
Originally posted by Zahlanzi==="The FMLA already requires employers to give up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for maternity or paternity"
"The FMLA already requires employers to give up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for maternity or paternity"
when you are working minimum wage, that is not an option.
"Forcing paid leave is forcing someone else to pay you money for not working."
the mother/father is working. one is raising a baby in a crucial stage of its development. the child who will pay y ...[text shortened]... as that"
human decency. that's pretty compelling reason.
pfff, heavy handed. that's funny.
when you are working minimum wage, that is not an option. ===
Another irrelevant smoke screen. Then give them money via some means tested social welfare program. That's totally beside the point. The issue in this thread is whether all employers should be forced to provide paid maternity leave. Your harping on the isolated cases of the destitute is irrelevant and intentionally misleading.
==="Forcing paid leave is forcing someone else to pay you money for not working."
the mother/father is working. one is raising a baby in a crucial stage of its development. the child who will pay your pension. ===
Actually, I pay for my own pension, thank you very much. I pay 15 grand a year (give or take) into the social security trust fund and expect to receive social security when I retire based on that. I realize it's necessary and I'm not complaining about it, but I'm sure as heck not going to give someone else credit for my social security.
Originally posted by sh76Are you self employed or do you have an employer making half your payment?
==="The FMLA already requires employers to give up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for maternity or paternity"
when you are working minimum wage, that is not an option. ===
Another irrelevant smoke screen. Then give them money via some means tested social welfare program. That's totally beside the point. The issue in this thread is whether all employers should be ...[text shortened]... ing about it, but I'm sure as heck not going to give someone else credit for my social security.
Originally posted by sh76You do recognize that you are participating in a welfare program in the name of Social Security, not a retirement program. The amount you "contribute" is multiples of what I paid, but your payback in benefits will not be. In fact, the most popular method of "saving" Social Security among politicians is making benefits means tested.
==="The FMLA already requires employers to give up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for maternity or paternity"
when you are working minimum wage, that is not an option. ===
Another irrelevant smoke screen. Then give them money via some means tested social welfare program. That's totally beside the point. The issue in this thread is whether all employers should be ...[text shortened]... ing about it, but I'm sure as heck not going to give someone else credit for my social security.
Originally posted by sh76Why is it better to have a means-tested program? Non-means tested programs are easier to administer, lead to greater solidarity and people who don't need it will pay more taxes anyway to pay for the greater cost of the program.
==="The FMLA already requires employers to give up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for maternity or paternity"
when you are working minimum wage, that is not an option. ===
Another irrelevant smoke screen. Then give them money via some means tested social welfare program. That's totally beside the point. The issue in this thread is whether all employers should be ...[text shortened]... ing about it, but I'm sure as heck not going to give someone else credit for my social security.
Actually, I pay for my own pension, thank you very much.
From what I understand about Social Security it is not like a private pension fund and low-income workers will get more out of it than they put in. In principle non-workers are always supported by workers regardless of what accounting the non-workers did when they were still workers. If everyone stopped working your Social Security funds would be meaningless.