21 May 23
@AverageJoe1
If those docs had been taken by Obama for instance, you would be screaming TRAITOR and don't even GO to 'well, they ALL took docs'
but the deal is NOBODY but Trump said I can declassify those docs by TELEPATHY or fight in court for MONTHS before most of the docs were recovered.
So I gather now that your god king TRUMP is accused, not indicted YET, on those docs, you fully agree with the idea we don't NEED all that classified BS so what's the big deal?
Or the phone calls to Georgia, I only want to find 11780 votes. Yessir, SUCH an innocent man, the most persecuted man since Jesus, such a shame for such an innocent individual.
Then there was Jan 6.
And of course to you, he had ZERO to do with that, did you remember
'TAKE DOWN THOSE FUKKING MAGS, they are not here to hurt ME''.
Sound like a real president?
@averagejoe1 saidYikes dude. Read. His campaign staff was full of verifiable felons. Of course he is a saint, I've said so numerous times on this thread alone. He's innocent. It's all the people who worked for him that broke laws. The investigations were important for catching them.
Not Trump again. After years, and millions, he is walking the streets, for god sakes. I hear he may be president of the USA in a year and a half. Packing his bags at MaraLago, not a care in the world. Why has he seemed so confident? Get this wildgrass, and all of you....he knew he was innocent of wrongdoing, excepting affairs, which he has paid for.
That is about it, unless you would like to add something....hopefully not in Sonhouse fashion.
21 May 23
@wildgrass saidYou are like Sonhouse. Jan 6!!?!?!!? Help me Rhonda. I'd forgotten about that, and apparently so have this interviewers.
Yikes dude. Read. His campaign staff was full of verifiable felons. Of course he is a saint, I've said so numerous times on this thread alone. He's innocent. It's all the people who worked for him that broke laws. The investigations were important for catching them.
TYime to move on, boys. Its is OK if yy write about Trump, our next president but for god sakes can we discuss the future? The papers are full of his history. Most of it good, as far as I can tell. Accomplishments, that is. His marital and affair stuff is of no interest to me. I want him to bring more success and kick Xi and Putin ass. You fellers would rather it be Biden, do ya'? What does that say about YOU?
21 May 23
@wildgrass saidYikes, read? About that which has happened? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Yikes dude. Read. His campaign staff was full of verifiable felons. Of course he is a saint, I've said so numerous times on this thread alone. He's innocent. It's all the people who worked for him that broke laws. The investigations were important for catching them.
22 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidHe simply knows that half of America is dumber than dirt.
Not Trump again. After years, and millions, he is walking the streets, for god sakes. I hear he may be president of the USA in a year and a half. Packing his bags at MaraLago, not a care in the world. Why has he seemed so confident? Get this wildgrass, and all of you....he knew he was innocent of wrongdoing, excepting affairs, which he has paid for.
That is about it, unless you would like to add something....hopefully not in Sonhouse fashion.
@averagejoe1 saidJoey, you're replying on a thread about a Shrillary investigation that is ongoing seven years now. Meantime, she's an irrelevant bystander. If you want to discuss the future, maybe sit this one out.
TYime to move on, boys. Its is OK if yy write about Trump, our next president but for god sakes can we discuss the future?
22 May 23
@mott-the-hoople saidTrump's not guilty of anything. But you said the investigations found nothing. That's false. Many people went to prison.
you look like a fool...name one thing Trump was convicted of,,,Ill wait
@wildgrass saidI will quit talking about her. If y’all will quit talking, anbout everybody in the past, beginning with trumps misdeeds. It gets so damn boring. For example, Bernie has never held any real job in his life, nor has Biden. So to consider they have some relevance is very difficult for a capitalist, productive person like myself to stomach. Yesterday Biden said the balloon that was gathering information was a silly balloon. I will leave you to cogitate on that.
Joey, you're replying on a thread about a Shrillary investigation that is ongoing seven years now. Meantime, she's an irrelevant bystander. If you want to discuss the future, maybe sit this one out.
And hey, there are a whole lot of liberals, who want your stuff, who are irrelevant.
@wildgrass saidHe said the investigations (5 of them?) found nothing on Trump. Further, Durham exonerated him. You respond about many (other?) people went to prison?
Trump's not guilty of anything. But you said the investigations found nothing. That's false. Many people went to prison.
Your arguments go begging, WGrass. I could say a guy in my firm was having an affair, or embezzled fees, and I fired him (equate sent to prison). He is ‘other people’, you see. Am I?
Get some coffee, sit with Sonhouse. Kev better off at another table. Whew.
22 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidwildass is a comical little twat...thoroughly made an ass of themselves on this subject in my thread
He said the investigations (5 of them?) found nothing on Trump. Further, Durham exonerated him. You respond about many (other?) people went to prison?
Your arguments go begging, WGrass. I could say a guy in my firm was having an affair, or embezzled fees, and I fired him (equate sent to prison). He is ‘other people’, you see. Am I?
Get some coffee, sit with Sonhouse. Kev better off at another table. Whew.
22 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidYeah because right wing scum never band together and carry weapons to intimidate people, or invade a government building or anything like that.
Whatever, haven't studied those particulars....why, you may be exactly right, but your answer has 'nothing to do with' my point to Suzianne. My point, which you not-so-deftly ignore, is that a Woke person would find it impossible to be woke by themselves. If they are an individual who is independent, responsible and self-sufficent, they don't need to brandish themselves ...[text shortened]... 'woke' position that one might take that does not include or require the presence of another person.
Do you ever think your posts through Joe, I mean literally ever?
Jesus wept they wear the same stupid MAGA hats and don the same ignorant bumper stickers, they are stepford wives for right wing dictator types.
@averagejoe1 saidKev……What is wrong with this. It is my opinion that to be woke, someone has to be somehow connected up to the other person who is the subject of the wokeness ….the protagonist?. One can hardly be woke if they live on an island by themselves, don’t you see Are you daft?
Whatever, haven't studied those particulars....why, you may be exactly right, but your answer has 'nothing to do with' my point to Suzianne. My point, which you not-so-deftly ignore, is that a Woke person would find it impossible to be woke by themselves. If they are an individual who is independent, responsible and self-sufficent, they don't need to brandish themselves ...[text shortened]... 'woke' position that one might take that does not include or require the presence of another person.
22 May 23
@wildgrass saidShe has committed at least 3 crimes.
Joey, you're replying on a thread about a Shrillary investigation that is ongoing seven years now. Meantime, she's an irrelevant bystander. If you want to discuss the future, maybe sit this one out.
22 May 23
@averagejoe1 saidYou have absolutely no idea what woke means, do you?
Kev……What is wrong with this. It is my opinion that to be woke, someone has to be somehow connected up to the other person who is the subject of the wokeness ….the protagonist?. One can hardly be woke if they live on an island by themselves, don’t you see Are you daft?
Not surprising really. You don’t comprehend dialectic materialism, so it’s easy to see that you wouldn’t comprehend systemic behaviouri either.