Kamala Harris will be our next President.
For all of his nasty comments, name calling, and personal attacks Donald Trump has not been able to make a dent in Harris's 3–7-point lead nationally, or her narrow lead in 6 of 7 critical swing states. The longer these leads hold, the more difficult it will be for Trump to turn things around.
If Trump loses, expect the full weight of all those delayed lawsuits and sentencing decisions to lite on him again, and with no Whitehouse to protect him, and no campaign funds to rob to pay his lawyers, things will get very ugly, very fast.
Your time is coming Donald! 😏
https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/09/27/election-2024-swing-state-polls-harris-leads-in-6-of-7-battlegrounds-in-latest-survey/
@mchill saidThe one bad thing I see about this is that we will have to be very careful about how his base will lash out. They're not going to take it very well. We have no idea how far Donald's retribution will go. Law enforcement in DC will have to be on the alert from election day all the way through the inauguration. That's 76 days of heightened readiness and that's a long time to be ready for anything.
Kamala Harris will be our next President.
For all of his nasty comments, name calling, and personal attacks Donald Trump has not been able to make a dent in Harris's 3–7-point lead nationally, or her narrow lead in 6 of 7 critical swing states. The longer these leads hold, the more difficult it will be for Trump to turn things around.
If Trump loses, expect the full we ...[text shortened]... rn/2024/09/27/election-2024-swing-state-polls-harris-leads-in-6-of-7-battlegrounds-in-latest-survey/
78d
@mchill saidI was pretty certain of this based on the US national polling, but now I’m not so sure.
Kamala Harris will be our next President.
The election outcome seems to hang on 7 states if I’m correctly informed, and of those states 3 are super critical I believe.
Can Harris win in those key states based on the agenda she has? How tight is it?
I’m not as sure of the outcome as I was, but I’m also not in the data weeds on this.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 06
- Moves
- 1140
78d
I've heard Trump is doing better in the polls than when he won.
Polls are biased and pathetic. I'm almost 50 years old and I've never once met anyone who took part in a poll.
Working class people don't have time for it so I imagine it's unemployed college kids and staff at the media companies taking part in the polls.
Has anyone here actually taken part in a real poll?
@thedogandthecello saidMelania when she was a stripper.
Has anyone here actually taken part in a real poll?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@mchill saidcount them chickens 😂
Kamala Harris will be our next President.
For all of his nasty comments, name calling, and personal attacks Donald Trump has not been able to make a dent in Harris's 3–7-point lead nationally, or her narrow lead in 6 of 7 critical swing states. The longer these leads hold, the more difficult it will be for Trump to turn things around.
If Trump loses, expect the full we ...[text shortened]... rn/2024/09/27/election-2024-swing-state-polls-harris-leads-in-6-of-7-battlegrounds-in-latest-survey/
77d
@mchill saidAccording to Steve Kornacki Trump has a 2 point lead over prison slavery Kamala.
Kamala Harris will be our next President.
For all of his nasty comments, name calling, and personal attacks Donald Trump has not been able to make a dent in Harris's 3–7-point lead nationally, or her narrow lead in 6 of 7 critical swing states. The longer these leads hold, the more difficult it will be for Trump to turn things around.
If Trump loses, expect the full we ...[text shortened]... rn/2024/09/27/election-2024-swing-state-polls-harris-leads-in-6-of-7-battlegrounds-in-latest-survey/
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@Metal-Brain saidshe damned sure wouldn’t have went to the boarder if she were in the lead
According to Steve Kornacki Trump has a 2 point lead over prison slavery Kamala.
libs like mckill haven’t figured they get lied to too
76d
2 edits
@divegeester saidWell, most agree that Trump will lose the popular vote but win the Electoral vote.
I was pretty certain of this based on the US national polling, but now I’m not so sure.
The election outcome seems to hang on 7 states if I’m correctly informed, and of those states 3 are super critical I believe.
Can Harris win in those key states based on the agenda she has? How tight is it?
I’m not as sure of the outcome as I was, but I’m also not in the data weeds on this.
The best reason possible for eliminating the Electoral College. It can't even do what it was designed to do: keep wanna-be autocrats out of the White House. Clearly, it fails on this. When less people vote, or rather, when not everyone's vote counts, Republicans win.
Even the BS Republican reason for keeping the Electoral College goes something like this: With the Electoral College, low pop states like Wyoming get an even voice in US politics.
With 538 total electoral votes, Wyoming gets 3. This is 0.56% of the total. Wyoming's population is 581,381 (all pop numbers sourced to 2022 numbers). The population of the entire US is 333,300,000. That's 0.17% of the total. So an electoral vote in Wyoming is worth 3 times what a regular vote is worth. That's not even, it's 3 times more. Their ratio is 3:1.
In Arizona, which gets 11 electoral votes, an electoral vote is worth 2.04% of the total. But their population is 7.36 million, or 2.21% of the total. Their ratio of electoral vote to pop vote is closer to 1:1.
Even in California, the most populous state in the Union, there are 54 electoral votes. That's slightly over 1% of the total. The population is 39,030,000, or 11.71% of the total. Their ratio is almost 1:12.
Under the Republican-fancied Electoral College, less populous states get an unfair advantage over more populous states. Thus, they are against giving more people a voice in selecting their next president. Electoral votes in Wyoming are worth 3 times as much as their popular vote, while in California each electoral vote is only worth 1/12th as much as their popular vote. Keep in mind that only the popular vote is a valid representation of who the people want as their next president.
So of course Republicans want to keep the Electoral College, while nearly everyone else sees it as yet another Republican power grab. Add to this the unfair rule that, in 49 out of 50 states, the winner of the popular vote in that state wins ALL of their electoral votes, disenfranchising up to 49% of the voters in that state. These two facts result in Republicans having a higher than normal chance of winning the White House. Of course they want to keep the Electoral College.
Even the field finally and remove the Electoral College and return the voice of the people back to the people, where it belongs. One person, one vote, no matter where they live. Each person's vote should be equal to any other person's vote. Politicians like to remind us that they work for us. If only that were true, we would not have to have had the burden of enduring one Trump presidency, much less two.
76d
@Metal-Brain saidJust stop talking.
According to Steve Kornacki Trump has a 2 point lead over prison slavery Kamala.
Every time I read one of your posts, I figure I get 1% dumber.