23 Jun 06
Originally posted by sword4damoclesI'll trust their biased opinion over your biased opinion any day of the week.
You point to "opinion", self stated in the article.
Since when was the WHO anything ever than a POLITICAL entity first, the WHO can be correct on occasion but this is CRAP. Conveluted, Repetitive, And Political.
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by lebowskiYou seem to miss my point, which was ...
sambo is fullo f crap if Bush had financial interests, etc, it'd be all over the news. sambo is a big douche
"It's said that George Bush has personal financial interests in oil and military equipment.
He should be held accountable with a thorough, powerful, independent and public investigation.
The problem is that the majority of Americans don't care ... while innocent people continue to die ... leading to more terrorists".
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by lebowskiActually ...
sambo is fullo f crap if Bush had financial interests, etc, it'd be all over the news. sambo is a big douche
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0207/S00047.htm
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/01/113464.php
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/081200-03.htm
http://www.tarpley.net/bush19.htm
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/cathavardharpers2,00.htm
http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/iraq.asp
http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/f911reader/index.php?id=16
23 Jun 06
1 edit
Originally posted by Sambo69Michael Moore???????? The Leni Riefenstahl want to be of the left?
Actually ...
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0207/S00047.htm
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/01/113464.php
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/081200-03.htm
http://www.tarpley.net/bush19.htm
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/cathavardharpers2,00.htm
http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/iraq.asp
http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/f911reader/index.php?id=16
24 Jun 06
Originally posted by Sambo69You seem to miss your own point.
You seem to miss my point, which was ...
"It's said that George Bush has personal financial interests in oil and military equipment.
He should be held accountable with a thorough, powerful, independent and public investigation.
The problem is that the majority of Americans don't care ... while innocent people continue to die ... leading to more terrorists".
"It's said" don't mean IT IS 'til you prove it, and as far as the rest goes .. every American has a vested interest in oil and military equipment.
It's what drives our economy.
It's what protects us from fools like you .. and it helps warm the globe too.
"We" don't need a through investigation because as you say most of us don't give a toss if he's getting paid .. as a matter of fact we hope he is.
Keep him happy and on the job.
You seem to ignore the fact that innocent Americans are dying too.
You've made your choice .. go pray to Allah .. pray we don't show up at your door dumbass. You lay down with camels, you wake up with flees.
You may wish to hide in your pseudo intellectual Ivory Tower but sooner or later you'll have to stand on your hind legs and at least pretend to be a man.
Look around infidel .. no amount of begging will spare your cowardly ass and i'm getting tired and embarassed to say we fight to protect schumks like you.
You're like the spoiled 14 yr old girl that hasn't been pulled into the alley yet .. you don't get it. It's dangerous out their .. people want to hurt you.
Grow a 'nad.
24 Jun 06
2 edits
as i understand it - correct me if i am wrong - but it seems that america is now sometimes treating their own wayward soldiers as murderers ...
this seems like a big step.
it sends an obvious message to me:
anyone will be held responsible when they perform criminal acts ... being in the u.s. forces does not give immunity from criminal courts!
(it can also be accompanied by a paranoid overture: junior soldiers can be scapegoated as the big bosses back out of the quagmire.)
on the whole i believe it to be a positive step ...
