Go back
Minimum Wage primer

Minimum Wage primer

Debates

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
I never have known how y'all define greedy. If I can sell my old bike for $100 when it is only worth $75, am I greedy? If a corporate board raises prices on their widgets so that their stokckholders will make more money, is that greed? Average Joe says it is good management, good business. However, if they price themselves out of the market, they will lose customers, ...[text shortened]... logic if you believe the govt should fix the problems in Texas.

I pride my logic on this post.
Listen Joe, I'm no lib...but I also have no illusions about corporate greed that you seem to have. I worked in industry...I watched bumbling fools that came from money given VP positions, then they present my work ( as an engineer) as an example of "their" success and earn themselves 50K year end bonuses ( low end ) while simultaneously refusing meager cost of living raises throughout the entire company. Do I really think that can be stopped...no, so I'm not going to fret about it.

My issue is: the raise minimum wage pushers doesn't fix that. Its a feel good happy pants faux solution that won't accomplish jack at best. At worst, it takes more money out of my pocket.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20433
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo
Most of the skilled working class earns above $15 per hr., but not much above. Their wages are not going to change with the law. However, the cost of nearly everything they consume to live is going to rise, because nearly 48% of the US workforce makes below $15 per hr. Do you believe their employers, corporations etc... are going to give them all raises under rising cost of doing business from the minimum wage increase? The net effect is relatively large diminishing returns for the working and lesser extent the entire middle class. If you can tell me how what I said doesn't happen, please do. I'm all ears.

Yes. Historically, all workers get a raise in short order. We've done this before, Joe. Many times before. And now, Big Union has it written into their collective bargaining agreements to get a raise if/when there is a raise in the minimum wage

People on social security get screwed because their boss is the US Government. They will NOT get a raise and Big Gov will continue to pay them with inflated $$Dollars.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20433
Clock
22 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder -IF businesses could get higher prices for their goods, they'd already charge them.

Sure, if they colluded. (which is why collusion is illegal)
But with the wages going for *everyone*, it allows them all to raise prices.

It isn't like we have never done tis before. The minimum wage has changed 22 times, we know what to expect.

Here's what EoT expects: When the smoke clears, we'll all be in a higher tax bracket.

"And for those of you in Rio Linda" - Limbaugh :-)

Megaditto's y'all

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54599
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
Listen Joe, I'm no lib...but I also have no illusions about corporate greed that you seem to have. I worked in industry...I watched bumbling fools that came from money given VP positions, then they present my work ( as an engineer) as an example of "their" success and earn themselves 50K year end bonuses ( low end ) while simultaneously refusing meager cost of living raises ...[text shortened]... ts faux solution that won't accomplish jack at best. At worst, it takes more money out of my pocket.
Yes, there are shady users and opportunists in corps, where good people like you are set aside, whatever, you cant get away from it, and to complain could get you fired.Bad corp, corp life aint perfect, it let you down. Have another job lined up, then go to the top and file a complaint. You might be surprised, the boss might not like that guy, either, may give you his job. Life in the corporate world.

The minimum wage issue has indeed been bandied about, but I think it is fairly agreed that it will cost jobs, I have read 1.7M jobs in the WSJ. It is astounding what Biden is doing. I guess their main focus is to get more votes from immigrants et al.....this is long-range planning, 50 years out, It is worth the collateral damage that the dems will wreak, to get to where there will be only one party. Theirs. They will own us.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
@joe-shmo
[i]Most of the skilled working class earns above $15 per hr., but not much above. Their wages are not going to change with the law. However, the cost of nearly everything they consume to live is going to rise, because nearly 48% of the US workforce makes below $15 per hr. [b]Do you believe their employers, corporations etc... are going to give them all raise ...[text shortened]... Government. They will NOT get a raise and Big Gov will continue to pay them with inflated $$Dollars.
Big Union doesn't have written in a contract to get a $8 per hr. raise. They might get a couple dollars, they aren't all getting the extra $8. Even if they did get the full Monty, its still a relative wage decrease compared to the bottom earners.

The bulk of union workers are making around 20$ per hr

$20/$7 = 300/105 > 196/105 = $(20+8)/$(7+8)

Everyone making above 15$ per hour is going to experience a relative wage decrease even if their wages are adjusted...which in the majority of the cases they won't be...

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
22 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1

I didn't read this whole thread so maybe this was discussed already. But there is a conservative case for raising the minimum wage. A minimum wage increase would shrink the size of government.

Low wages have a cost on our society. Low wage earners don't make enough money to feed their families. They are impoverished. They receive benefits from the government in the form of food assistance and tax credits. They receive benefits from other taxpayers because their employers do not pay them enough. My tax bill is supplementing the salary of low wage earners, and the only beneficiary of this is the employer.

I don't know the exact numbers but annual government expenditures were forecast to decrease by ~$30 billion with a $15 minimum wage by raising the earnings of tens of millions of low wage earners.

Raising the minimum wage shrinks the size of government by shifting the burden of responsibility for food/shelter from the government to the employer.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
22 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
"It would be highly beneficial to low wage workers." I think, yes, but only for a short period until the real effect of raising the wage is felt. Up go the prices of goods, so their take-home pay does not increase their buying power anymore. Surely we do are not so naive as to think that 'nothing different' will arise when the wages are raised.
This analysis does not take into account the fact that low wage workers actually "make" more than their salary when you factor in their government benefits. Buying power doesn't change much. A minimum wage increase only shifts the burden of who is paying them from the government to their employer.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
@AverageJoe1

I didn't read this whole thread so maybe this was discussed already. But there is a conservative case for raising the minimum wage. A minimum wage increase would shrink the size of government.

Low wages have a cost on our society. Low wage earners don't make enough money to feed their families. They are impoverished. They receive benefits from the governm ...[text shortened]... nment by shifting the burden of responsibility for food/shelter from the government to the employer.
The government doesn't shrink...it always grows until it collapses under its own weight. That's pretty much immutable physical law. They, ( like the corporations) will not except a loss in profits ( tax revenue )...they'll just change the game behind the smoke from the blast...

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
The government doesn't shrink...it always grows until it collapses under its own weight. That's pretty much immutable physical law. They, ( like the corporations) will not except a loss in profits ( tax revenue )...they'll just change the game behind the smoke from the blast...
With minimum wage increase, this specific part of it will though. Corporations should be paying their full time employees enough to keep them off of government assistance programs.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
With minimum wage increase, this specific part of it will though. Corporations should be paying their full time employees enough to keep them off of government assistance programs.
I don't believe this is the kind of physical system you think it is. The minimum wage is completely arbitrary...the bottom of the heap, it will always be the bottom of the heap regardless of how much it is. We didn't inject any value in the system, we just changed the arbitrary datum from which we measure said value.

Think of it like a conservation law... do we change how efficiently\effectively
we generate value in the system by moving the arbitrary datum by which we measure value? Imagine I'm holding a ball, how high is it?

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
22 Feb 21
13 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
I don't believe this is the kind of physical system you think it is. The minimum wage is completely arbitrary...the bottom of the heap, it will always be the bottom of the heap regardless of how much it is. We didn't inject any value in the system, we just changed the arbitrary datum from which we measure said value.
Obviously the minimum wage number is arbitrary. I wasn't arguing that it's not.

The decrease in our welfare state resulting from increasing the minimum wage is not my analysis. You can find it here: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-15-minimum-wage-could-cut-government-spending-on-welfare-programs-by-up-to-30-billion-study-finds-11612290567

There are better ways to get people out of poverty than raising the minimum wage. But the numbers are pretty clear that it would decrease our welfare state and shift the burden of food/shelter responsibility from the government to the corporation. Government gets smaller.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
30 edits

@wildgrass said
Obviously the minimum wage number is arbitrary. I wasn't arguing that it's not.

The decrease in our welfare state resulting from increasing the minimum wage is not my analysis. You can find it here: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-15-minimum-wage-could-cut-government-spending-on-welfare-programs-by-up-to-30-billion-study-finds-11612290567

There are better ways to ...[text shortened]... rden of food/shelter responsibility from the government to the corporation. Government gets smaller.
For pete sake who alerted your post!?! What did you say that was so inflammatory, that min wage is arbitrary?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
19 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Every time I edit the post its get another alert! Try editing yours to see if it automatically gets another "alert"? This is fun!

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
22 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
For pete sake who alerted your post!?! What did you say that was so inflammatory, that min wage is arbitrary?
LOL.

I think the system must have noticed that the arbitrary nature of federal minimum wage numbers was irrelevant to our discussion?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
22 Feb 21
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
Obviously the minimum wage number is arbitrary. I wasn't arguing that it's not.

The decrease in our welfare state resulting from increasing the minimum wage is not my analysis. You can find it here: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-15-minimum-wage-could-cut-government-spending-on-welfare-programs-by-up-to-30-billion-study-finds-11612290567

There are better ways to ...[text shortened]... rden of food/shelter responsibility from the government to the corporation. Government gets smaller.
Take a free standing spring and and place it in your hand. It has a fixed height relative to your hand. Now shove your hand toward the opposite end of the spring. While you are shoving, the spring compresses ( the ends move towards each other ), whenever you stop shoving the spring will return to its rest height after oscillating a bit.

This is obviously analogous to raising the min wage. We aren't changing any of the properties of the economic spring to allow for more potential we just shoved one end of it toward the other, and once we've stopped shoving the spring will return to its rest height ( where it was ) after bouncing around a bit. So any analysis that says they will reduced need for gov assistance by shoving one end of the economic spring toward the other is surely talking about short term transient behavioral change. The economic shove is unsustainable, and any positives from the transient behavior during ( or shortly after ) the shove will undoubtedly die out. Back to square 1

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.